Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ab initio and NBO studies of methyl internal rotation in 1-methyl-2(1H)-quinolinone: effect of aromatic substitution to 1-methyl-2(1H)-pyridone

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

1-methyl-2(1H)-quinolinone (MeQone) forms the framework of several hundred alkaloid molecules both natural and synthetic being used for various biological applications. From chemical structure point of view, the molecules can also be seen as an aromatic ring fused to 1-methyl-2(1H)-pyridone (1-MPY). In this work, we present theoretical investigations on internal rotation of methyl group in MeQone in light of 1-MPY. We looked into the change in the three-fold (V3) methyl internal rotation barrier resulted from the aromatic ring substitution to 1-MPY. The V3 term in two molecules were calculated using density functional theory and Hartree-Fock theory with different basis sets. MeQone has calculated V3 term (in S0 state) three times higher in magnitude compared with that of 1-MPY. The role of aromatic substitution in increase of V3 term is investigated using natural bond orbital (NBO) analyses. In the NBO analysis, it is found that the aromatic ring as highly delocalized π-system lowers the magnitude of hyperconjugation energy in MeQone compared with 1-MPY. This is due to the extension of delocalization of π-electrons to pyridone ring which lowers the orbital overlap. However, the Lewis energy increases substantially and make the overall barrier energy higher in MeQone compared with 1-MPY. From our study, we conclude that in the molecules such as 1-MPY and MeQone where the methyl group has two single bonds vicinal to it, the overall hyperconjugation energy is always barrier forming with nonlocal interactions playing significant role. Also, the Lewis energy plays the decisive role in barrier formation, and its magnitude can be tuned by tuning the π-electron delocalization. We have also looked into the change in methyl group conformation upon electronic excitation to S1 state. In 1-MPY, the methyl group rotated by 60° upon excitation whereas in MeQone, there was no conformational change. Strong π*-σ* interaction in LUMO in top-of-barrier conformation is responsible for the change in the methyl group conformation in 1-MPY, whereas same π*-σ* interaction in LUMO of minimum energy conformation results in unchanged excited state conformation in MeQone.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Camiruaga A, Usabiaga I, D’mello VC, García GA, Wategaonkar S, Fernández JA (2019) Revisiting the spectroscopy of xanthine derivatives: theobromine and theophylline. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21(48):26430–26437. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CP05068J

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Trachsel MA, Wiedmer T, Blaser S, Frey H-M, Li Q, Ruiz-Barragan S, Blancafort L, Leutwyler S (2016) The excited-state structure, vibrations, lifetimes, and nonradiative dynamics of jet-cooled 1-methylcytosine. J. Chem. Phys. 145(13):134307

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pradhan B, Singh BP, Nandi CK, Chakraborty T, Kundu T (2005) Origin of methyl torsional barrier in 1-methyl-2-(1H)-pyridone. J. Chem. Phys. 122(20):204323–204329

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Okuyama K, Mikami N, Ito M (1985) Internal rotation of the methyl group in the electronically excited state: o-, m-, and p-fluorotoluene. J. Phys. Chem. 89(26):5617–5625

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ito M, Takazawa K, Fujii M (1993) Internal rotation of the methyl group in o-, m- and p-fluorotoluene and their ions as studied by supersonic jet spectroscopies. J. Mol. Struct. 292:9–16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Suzuki K, S-i I, Sakai M, Fujii M (2005) Pulsed field ionisation—ZEKE photoelectron spectrum of o-, m- and p-tolunitrile. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 142(3):215–221

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sinha RK, Pradhan B, Singh BP, Kundu T, Biswas P, Chakraborty T (2006) Origin of threefold symmetric torsional potential of methyl group in 4-methylstyrene. J. Chem. Phys. 124(14):144316–144310

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujii M, Yamauchi M, Takazawa K, Ito M (1994) Electronic spectra of o-, m- and p-tolunitrile—substituent effect on internal rotation of the methyl group. Spectrochim. Acta A Molec. Spectrosc. 50(8–9):1421–1433

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nakai H, Kawamura Y (2000) π*–σ* Hyperconjugation mechanism on the rotational barrier of the methyl group (II): 1- and 2-methylnaphthalenes in the S0, S1, C0, and A1 states. Chem. Phys. Lett. 318(4–5):298–304

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Murray JK, Balan C, Allgeier AM, Kasparian A, Viswanadhan V, Wilde C, Allen JR, Yoder SC, Biddlecome G, Hungate RW, Miranda LP (2010) Dipeptidyl-quinolone derivatives inhibit hypoxia inducible factor-1α prolyl hydroxylases-1, −2, and −3 with altered selectivity. J. Comb. Chem. 12(5):676–686

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Donnell F, Smyth TJP, Ramachandran VN, Smyth WF (2010) A study of the antimicrobial activity of selected synthetic and naturally occurring quinolines. Int. J. Antimicrob. Ag. 35(1):30–38

    Google Scholar 

  12. Audisio D, Messaoudi S, Cojean S, Peyrat J-F, Brion J-D, Bories C, Huteau F, Loiseau PM, Alami M (2012) Synthesis and antikinetoplastid activities of 3-substituted quinolinones derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 52:44–50

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakashima K-i, Oyama M, Ito T, Akao Y, Witono JR, Darnaedi D, Tanaka T, Murata J, Iinuma M (2012) Novel quinolinone alkaloids bearing a lignoid moiety and related constituents in the leaves of Melicope denhamii. Tetrahedron 68(10):2421–2428

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Singh S, Das T, Awasthi M, Pandey VP, Pandey B, Dwivedi UN (2016) DNA topoisomerase-directed anticancerous alkaloids: ADMET-based screening, molecular docking, and dynamics simulation. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 63(1):125–137

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nishiwaki N (2010) Chemistry of nitroquinolones and synthetic application to unnatural 1-Methyl-2-quinolone derivatives. Molecules 15(8):5174–5195

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Pradhan B, Sinha RK, Singh BP, Kundu T (2007) Origin of methyl torsional barrier in 1-methyl-2(1H)-pyridinimine and 3-methyl-2(1H)-pyridone: II. Ground state. J. Chem. Phys. 126(11):114313–114317

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sinha RK, Kundu T. Vibronic spectra of jet-cooled 1-methyl-2(1H)-quinolinone studied by Fluorescence spectroscopy and Quantum chemical calculation. Under preparation

  18. Goodman L, Kundu T, Leszczynski J (1995) Energetic consequences of the multidimensional nature of internal rotation in acetaldehyde. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117(7):2082–2088

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Foster JP, Weinhold F (1980) Natural hybrid orbitals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102(24):7211–7218

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Reed AE, Curtiss LA, Weinhold F (1988) Intermolecular interactions from a natural bond orbital, donor-acceptor viewpoint. Chem. Rev. 88(6):899–926

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Reed AE, Weinhold F (1991). Isr. J. Chem. 31:277

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Weinhold F, Landis CR (2001) Natural bond orbitals and extensions of localized bonding concepts. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. Eur. 2(2):91–104

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pophristic V, Goodman L (2001) Hyperconjugation not steric repulsion leads to the staggered structure of ethane. Nature 411(6837):565–568

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino J, Zheng G, Sonnenberg JL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Montgomery JA, Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Rega N, Millam JM, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Zakrzewski VG, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Farkas, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox DJ (2009) Gaussian 09, revision D.01. Wallingford CT

  25. Glendening ED, Badenhoop JK, Reed AE, Carpenter JE, Bohmann JA, Morales CM, Landis CR, Weinhold F (2013) NBO 6.0. Theoretical chemistry insititute, University of Wisconsin, Madison

  26. Wendt M, Weinhold F (2001) NBOView 1.1: NBO orbital graphics. University Wisconsin, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sinha RK, Pradhan B, Wategaonkar S, Singh BP, Kundu T (2007) Spectroscopic studies on methyl torsional behavior in 1-methyl-2(1H)-pyridone, 1-methyl-2(1H)-pyridinimine, and 3-methyl-2(1H)-pyridone. I. Excited state. J. Chem. Phys. 126(11):114312–114310

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Financial support from the Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences (BRNS) under project grant no. 2012/34/69/BRNS/2971 is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajeev K. Sinha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 153 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sinha, R.K. Ab initio and NBO studies of methyl internal rotation in 1-methyl-2(1H)-quinolinone: effect of aromatic substitution to 1-methyl-2(1H)-pyridone. J Mol Model 26, 92 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-020-04358-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-020-04358-9

Keywords