Abstract
In this paper, the authors investigate and compare two types of algorithms for removing EOG artifacts in EEG measurements. First, the sources that introduce EOG artifacts are explained and the authors briefly review the existing algorithms for EOG artifacts removal in EEG signals. Two selected algorithms—recursive least square and blind source separation are discussed in details. These two algorithms were chosen either for their good performance or for their low computational charge to be used in ambulatory monitoring devices. In the third part, the experimental protocol to collect EOG and EEG measurements are described. In the fourth part, the authors summarize the results after applying two algorithms to the collected real EEG data. From these results, conclusions are drawn on the performances of these selected algorithms. Several possible improvements or challenges are proposed in the discussion section.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/728db/728dbf0a1f3d2f2bc9ac8ccdb49a0e515d0143cb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78ad4/78ad47951a3cacc7ac26ae2c3cf6201290167194" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d19ad/d19adcd768878fa68ffaa1c14e749ef8c2715045" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1895d/1895da5cb2a5edf941481ad3e8f7846dda325f24" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00cef/00cefd8a6d1ace0ec6ea585362cdb2775c7a7060" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34c05/34c057c71cfe3be7bc191d08eb55e4499c26deb5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1e38/c1e387a92547d788153cabd61c4d56d9885bbecf" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d656/9d6568b406e492488352d4892469df02e00d1437" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d721e/d721e5ca9b6e9a8552b61042482a0f2861a6f027" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f594/4f594f4d1205a002b9a38b39104487868c936928" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6f7a/c6f7a4dcadee59f513fa1c3aa3a9d1b3ef90fcb6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b7ad/5b7adff4af820ef3f6f1884b3f167e9a45383729" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34573/3457356c2e863b04593c284f8e80229b0b01fa72" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e9f6/9e9f6c7381fc404278f6fdb4a874f7cea32894ed" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13200/132003f5a104a77e3bd7c016937579d0eca7c20d" alt=""
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atwood, H.L., MacKay, W.A.:. Essentials of neurophysiology, B.C. Decker, Hamilton, Canada, 1989, pp. 200–205 (1993)
Tyner, F.S., Knott, J.R.: Fundamentals of EEG Technology: Basic Concepts and Methods, vol. 1. Raven Press, New York (1989)
Niedermeyer, E., Lopes da Silva, F.H.: Electroencephalog-Raphy: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Related Fields, 3rd edn, pp. 351–354. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia (1993)
Anderer, P., Roberts, S., Schlogl, A., Gruber, G., Klosch, G., Herrmann, W., et al.: Artifact processing in computerized analysis of sleep EEG a review. Neuropsychobiology 40, 150–157 (1999)
McFarland, D.J., McCane, L.M., David, S.V., Wolpaw, J.R.: Spatial filter selection for EEG-based communication. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 103, 386–394 (1997)
Goncharova II, D.J., McFarland, T.M., Vaughan, J.R.: Wolpaw, EMG contamination of EEG: spectral and topographical characteristics. Clin. Neurophysiol. 114, 1580–1593 (2003)
McFarland, D.J., Sarnacki, W.A., Vaughan, T.M., Wolpaw, J.R.: Braincomputer interface (BCI) operation: signal and noise during early training sessions. Clin. Neurophysiol. 116, 56–62 (2005)
Gratton, G., Coles, M.G.H., Donchin, E.: A new method for the online removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr.-Phys. Clin. Neurophysiol. 55, 468–484 (1983)
Kenemans, J.L., Molenaar, P.C.M., Verbaten, M.N., Slangen, J.L.: Removal of the ocular artifact from the EEG: a comparison of time and frequency domain methods with simulated and real data. Psychophysiology 28, 115–121 (1991)
Whitton, J.L., Lue, F., Moldofsky, H.: A spectral method for removing eye movement artifacts from the EEG. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 44, 735–741 (1978)
Woestengurg, J.C., Verbaten, M.N., Slangen, J.L.: The removal of the eye movement artifact from the EEG by regression analysis in the frequency domain. Biol. Physiol. 16, 127–147 (1983)
Lagerlund, T.D., Sharbrough, F.W., Busacker, N.E.: Spatial filtering of multichannel electroencephalographic recordings through principal component analysis by singular value decomposition. Clin. Neurophysiol. 14(1), 73–82 (1997)
Elbert, T., Lutzenberger, W., Rockstroh, B., Birbaumer, N.: Removal of ocular artifacts from the EEG-a biophysical approach to the EOG. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 60, 455–463 (1985)
Shoker, L., Sanei, S., Latif, M.A.: Artifact removal from electroencephalograms using a hybrid BSS-SVM algorithm. IEEE Signal Process Lett. 12(10), 721–724 (2005)
Urretarazu, E., Iriarte, J., Alegre, M., Valencia, M., Vireri, C., Artieda, J.: Independent component analysis removing artifacts in ictal recordings. Epilepsia 45, 1071–1078 (2004)
Pizzagalli, D.A.: Electroencephalography and high-density electrophysiological source localization. In: Cacioppo, J.T., Tassinary, G.G. (eds.) Bernston, Handbook of Psychophysiology, 3rd edn, pp. 56–84. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)
Krishnaveni, V., Jayaraman, S., Anitha, L., Ramadoss, K.: Removal of ocular artifacts from EEG using adaptive thresholding of wavelet coefficients. J. Neural Eng. 3, 338–346 (2006)
Indiradevi, K.P., Elias, E., Sathidevi, P.S., Nayak, S.D., Radhakrishman, K.: A multilevel wavelet approach for automatic detection of epileptic spikes in the electroencephalogram. J. Comput. Biol. Med. 38(7), 805–816 (2008)
Zhou, W., Gotman, J.: Removal of EMG and ECG artifacts from EEG based on wavelet transform and ICA. In: Proceedings of 26th Annual International Conference IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society(EMBS04), San Francisco, CA, Sep. 15, pp. 392–395 (2004)
Nguyen, H.-A.T., Musson, J., Li, J., McKenzie, F., Zhang, G., Zu, R., Richey, C., Schell, T.: EEG artifact removal using a wavelet neural network. In: Proceedings of Mod Sim World (2010)
Jung, T.-P., Humphries, C., Lee, T.-W., Makeig, S., McKeown, M.J., Iragui, V., Sejnowski, T.J.: Extended ICA removes artifacts from electroencephalographic recordings. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 10, 894–900 (1998)
Vigario, R.N.: Extraction of ocular artifacts from EEG using independent component analysis. Electroencephal. Clin. Neurophysiol. 103, 395–404 (1997)
He, P., Wilson, G., Russell, C.: Removal of ocular artifacts from electro-encephalogram by adaptive filtering. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 42, 407–412 (2004)
Belouchrani, A., Abed-Meraim, K., Cardoso, J.F., Moulines, E.: A blind source separation technique using second-order statistics. IEEE Trans. Signal Proc. 45, 434–444 (1997)
Joyce, C.A., Gorodnitsky, I.F., Kutas, M.: Automatic removal of eye movement and blink artifacts from EEG data using blind component separation. Psychophysiology 41(2), 313–325 (2004)
Croft, R.J., Barry, R.J.: Removal of ocular artifact from the EEG: a review. Neurophysiol. Clin. 30, 5–19 (2000)
Rowland, V.: Cortical steady potential (direct current potential) in reinforcement and learning. Prog. Physiol. Psychol. 2, 1–77 (1968)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning (No. TP2015029) for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qi, W. Evaluating algorithms of removing EOG artifacts with experimental data in brain computer interface. Cluster Comput 22 (Suppl 4), 10371–10384 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1555-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1555-3