Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis of quantum particle automata for solving the density classification problem

  • Published:
Quantum Information Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To advance our understanding of quantum cellular automata in problem solving through parallel and distributed computing, this research quantized the density classification problem and adopted the quantum particle automata (QPA) to solve the quantized problem. In order to solve this problem, the QPA needed a unitary operator to carry out the QPA evolution and a boundary partition to make the classification decisions. We designed a genetic algorithm (GA) to search for the unitary operators and the boundary partitions to classify the density of binary inputs with length 5. The GA was able to find more than one unitary operator that can transform the QPA in ways such that when the particle was measured, it was more likely to collapse to the basis states that were on the correct side of the boundary partition for the QPA to decide whether the binary input had majority density 0 or majority density 1. We analyzed these solutions and found that the QPA evolution dynamic was driven by a particular parameter \(\theta \) of the unitary operator: A small \(\theta \) gave the particle small mass hence fast evolution, while large \(\theta \) had the opposite effect. While these results are encouraging, scaling these solutions for binary inputs of arbitrary length of \(n\) requires additional analysis, which we will investigate in our future work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. In physical implementation, when a particle is measured, it collapses to one of the possible states. Meanwhile, all superposition information is destroyed by the measurement operation. Since the objective of this research is to solve the quantized density classification problem by simulating the algorithm in a classical computer, the measurement of a particle does not destroy the amplitudes at each superpositions. Once a solution (\(S, M, Z\)) is obtained, the physical implementation of a particle only requires one measurement (at time step \(M\)) to solve the problem.

  2. By parameterizing \(S\) from a \(U(2)\) to a \(SU(2)\), the number of independent parameters can be reduced to 4.

References

  1. Andre, D., Bennett, F.H. III, Koza, J.R.: Discovery by genetic programming of a cellular automata rule that is better than any known rule for the majority classification problem. In: Genetic Programming 1996: Proceedings of the First Annual Conference, pp. 3–11 (1996)

  2. Capcarrere, M.S., Sipper, M., Tomassini, M.: Two-state, r = 1 cellular automaton that classifies density. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77(24), 4969–4971 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Deutsch, D.: Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 400, 97–117 (1985)

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Feynman, R.P.: Quantum mechanical computers. Optics News, pp. 11–20, February (1985)

  5. Gach, P., Kurdyumov, G.L., Levin, L.A.: One-dimensional uniform arrays that wash out finite islands. Probl. Pereda. Inf. 14(3), 92–98 (1978)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldberg, D.E.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. ISBN: 0-201-15767-5 (1989)

  7. Gray, F.: Pulse code communication, U.S. Patent 2,632,058, March 17 (1953)

  8. Grössing, G., Zeilinger, A.: Quantum cellular automata. Complex Syst. 2, 197–208 (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Holland, J.H.: Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. MIT Press, Boston, MA (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koza, J.: Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection. MIT Press, Boston, MA (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Land, M., Belew, R.K.: No perfect two-state cellular automate for density classification exists. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74(25), 5148–5150 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer, D.: From quantum cellular automata to quantum lattice gases. J. Stat. Phys. 85(5–6), 554–574 (1996)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mitchell, M., Crutchfield, J.P., Hraber, P.T.: Evolving cellular automata to perform computations: mechanisms and impediments. Phys. D 75, 361–391 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Packard, N.H.: Adaptation toward the edge of chaos. In: Kelso, J.A.S., Mandell, A.J., Shlesinger, M.F. (eds.) Dynamic Patterns in Complex Systems, pp. 293–301. World Scientific, Singapore (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Toffoli, T., Margolus, N.H.: Invertible cellular automata: a review. Phys. D 45(1–2), 229–253 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Watrous, J.: On one-dimensional quantum cellular automata. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 528–537, October (1995)

  17. Wolfram, S.: Statistical mechanics of cellular automata. Rev. Mod. Phys. 55(3), 601–644 (1983)

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. David Meyer for his comments and suggestions on this research. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments to improve this paper. Tina also thanks Department of Mathematics at the University of California San Diego for their help during her visit working on this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tina Yu.

Appendix

Appendix

figure a
figure b
figure c
figure d

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, T., Ben-Av, R. Analysis of quantum particle automata for solving the density classification problem. Quantum Inf Process 14, 1227–1247 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-015-0930-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-015-0930-3

Keywords

Navigation