Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Fault resilient routing based on moth flame optimization scheme for underwater wireless sensor networks

  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fault resilient routing is a typical issue for underwater wireless sensor networks (\( UWSNs \)) due to contact of underwater creatures, mobility of nodes and natural disaster. In the existing studies, most of the researchers introduced routing scheme for routing the packets towards the base station through a cluster head. However, these schemes use static or mobile nodes for deployment, but nodes move from its original position to another position and get stuck in a particular region due to ocean current, natural disaster and environmental interference. Therefore, this leads to high energy depletion, link failure, disjoint path and overloaded data. To resolve this issue, we have proposed fault resilient routing based on moth flame optimization (\( MFO \)) scheme for transferring the packets towards the base station through autonomous underwater vehicles (\( AUVs \)). In this scheme, \( AUVs \) is used instead of cluster head to avoid the reclustering, overloading problem and it also feasible for large scale networks. There may be a disjoint path issue, so we have deployed additional mobile nodes with the help of \( AUVs \) within the network. Further, a novel fitness function is integrated with the \( MFO \) scheme to overcome the link failure problem. The proposed scheme is applied to select the best forwarding node for transmitting the packets towards the nearest \( AUVs \) using multi-hop acoustic links. In \( UWSNs \), \( AUVs \) is placed to move the packets towards the \( BS \) from lower level to upper level. Performance evaluation of proposed scheme shows better result in terms of fault resilient, residual energy, network lifetime, packet delivery ratio and convergence rate than the existing scheme under the different network scenario.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Han, G., Jiang, J., Bao, N., Wan, L., & Guizani, M. (2015). Routing protocols for underwater wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Magazine,53(11), 72–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Heidemann, J., Stojanovic, M., & Zorzi, M. (2012). Underwater sensor networks: Applications, advances and challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences,370(1958), 158–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Felemban, E., Shaikh, F. K., Qureshi, U. M., Sheikh, A. A., & Qaisar, S. B. (2015). Underwater sensor network applications: A comprehensive survey. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks,11(11), 896832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Amoli, P. V. (2016). An overview on current researches on underwater sensor networks: Applications, challenges and future trends. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering,6(3), 955.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li, N., Martínez, J. F., Meneses Chaus, J., & Eckert, M. (2016). A survey on underwater acoustic sensor network routing protocols. Sensors,16(3), 414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Darehshoorzadeh, A., & Boukerche, A. (2015). Underwater sensor networks: A new challenge for opportunistic routing protocols. IEEE Communications Magazine,53(11), 98–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghoreyshi, S. M., Shahrabi, A., & Boutaleb, T. (2017). Void-handling techniques for routing protocols in underwater sensor networks: Survey and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials,19(2), 800–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Basagni, S., Petrioli, C., Petroccia, R., & Spaccini, D. (2015). CARP: A channel-aware routing protocol for underwater acoustic wireless networks. Ad Hoc Networks,34, 92–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou, Z., Yao, B., Xing, R., Shu, L., & Bu, S. (2015). E-CARP: An energy efficient routing protocol for UWSNs in the internet of underwater things. IEEE Sensors Journal,16(11), 4072–4082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ilyas, N., Alghamdi, T. A., Farooq, M. N., Mehboob, B., Sadiq, A. H., Qasim, U., et al. (2015). AEDG: AUV-aided efficient data gathering routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. Procedia Computer Science,52, 568–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Khan, J., & Cho, H. S. (2015). A distributed data-gathering protocol using AUV in underwater sensor networks. Sensors,15(8), 19331–19350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kanthimathi, N. (2017). Void handling using geo-opportunistic routing in underwater wireless sensor networks. Computers & Electrical Engineering,64, 365–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gomathi, R. M., & Manickam, J. M. L. (2018). Energy efficient shortest path routing protocol for underwater acoustic wireless sensor network. Wireless Personal Communications,98(1), 843–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goyal, N., Dave, M., & Verma, A. K. (2016). Energy efficient architecture for intra and inter cluster communication for underwater wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications,89(2), 687–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Coutinho, R. W., Boukerche, A., Vieira, L. F., & Loureiro, A. A. (2015). Geographic and opportunistic routing for underwater sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Computers,65(2), 548–561.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Rani, S., Ahmed, S. H., Malhotra, J., & Talwar, R. (2017). Energy efficient chain based routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications,92, 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rahman, M. A., Lee, Y., & Koo, I. (2017). EECOR: An energy-efficient cooperative opportunistic routing protocol for underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Access,5, 14119–14132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Goyal, N., Dave, M., & Verma, A. K. (2018). A novel fault detection and recovery technique for cluster-based underwater wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Communication Systems,31(4), e3485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Qiuli, C., Wei, X., Fei, D., & Ming, H. (2018). A reliable routing protocol against hotspots and burst for UASN-based fog systems. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Khasawneh, A., Latiff, M. S. B. A., Kaiwartya, O., & Chizari, H. (2018). A reliable energy-efficient pressure-based routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor network. Wireless Networks,24(6), 2061–2075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahmed, F., Wadud, Z., Javaid, N., Alrajeh, N., Alabed, M., & Qasim, U. (2018). Mobile sinks assisted geographic and opportunistic routing based interference avoidance for underwater wireless sensor network. Sensors,18(4), 1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Albukhary, R. A., & Bouabdallah, F. (2019). Time-variant balanced routing strategy for underwater wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks,25, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Faheem, M., Ngadi, M. A., & Gungor, V. C. (2019). Energy efficient multi-objective evolutionary routing scheme for reliable data gathering in internet of underwater acoustic sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 101912.

  24. Wan, S., Zhang, Y., & Chen, J. (2016). On the construction of data aggregation tree with maximizing lifetime in large-scale wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sensors Journal,16(20), 7433–7440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen, C., Liu, L., Qiu, T., Yang, K., Gong, F., & Song, H. (2018). ASGR: An artificial spider-web-based geographic routing in heterogeneous vehicular networks. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems,20(5), 1604–1620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Luo, H., Guo, Z., Wu, K., Hong, F., & Feng, Y. (2009). Energy balanced strategies for maximizing the lifetime of sparsely deployed underwater acoustic sensor networks. Sensors,9(9), 6626–6651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Domingo, M. C. (2008). Overview of channel models for underwater wireless communication networks. Physical Communication,1(3), 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mirjalili, S. (2015). Moth-flame optimization algorithm: A novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm. Knowledge-Based Systems,89, 228–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Technology, National Institute of Technology Raipur, Raipur, 492010, Chhattisgarh, India

    Sangeeta Kumari & Pavan Kumar Mishra

  2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology Raipur, Raipur, 492010, Chhattisgarh, India

    Veena Anand

Authors
  1. Sangeeta Kumari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pavan Kumar Mishra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Veena Anand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sangeeta Kumari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumari, S., Mishra, P.K. & Anand, V. Fault resilient routing based on moth flame optimization scheme for underwater wireless sensor networks. Wireless Netw 26, 1417–1431 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-019-02209-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-019-02209-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation