Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

USC-ENet: a high-efficiency model for the diagnosis of liver tumors combining B-mode ultrasound and clinical data

  • Research
  • Published:
Health Information Science and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Ultrasound image acquisition has the advantages of being low cost, rapid, and non-invasive, and it does not produce radiation. Currently, ultrasound is widely used in the diagnosis of liver tumors. However, owing to the complex presentation and diverse features of benign and malignant liver tumors, accurate diagnosis of liver tumors using ultrasound is difficult even for experienced radiologists. In recent years, artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis has proven to provide effective support to radiologists. However, there is room for further improvement in the existing ultrasound artificial intelligence diagnostic model of liver tumor. First, the image diagnostic model may not fully consider relevant clinical data in the decision-making process. Second, owing to the difficulty in collecting biopsy pathology and physician-labeled ultrasound data of liver tumors, training datasets are usually small, and commonly used large neural networks tend to overfit on small datasets, which seriously affects the generalization of the model.

Methods

In this study, we propose a deep learning–assisted diagnosis model called USC-ENet, which integrates B-mode ultrasound features of liver tumors and clinical data of patients, and we design a small neural network specifically for small-scale medical images combined with an attention mechanism.

Results and conclusion

Real data from 542 patients with liver tumors (N = 2168 images) are used during model training and validation. Experiments show that USC-ENet can achieve a good classification effect (area under the curve = 0.956, sensitivity = 0.915, and specificity = 0.880) after small-scale data training, and it has certain interpretability, showing good potential for clinical adoption. In conclusion, our model provides not only a reliable second opinion for radiologists but also a reference for junior radiologists who lack clinical experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data & Code availability

The datasets and code generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request

Notes

  1. The datasets and code generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Li G, Le Y, Peng Yu, et al. Research progress on sensitivity related factors of sorafenib in the treatment of liver cancer. J Hepatobiliary Surg. 2018;26(1):74–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang D, Jiang F, Zhifang H, et al. Prevention of primary liver cancer. Chin J Gerontol. 2018;38(17):4317–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cai L. Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in early diagnosis of cirrhosis complicated with small hepatocellular carcinoma. Imag Res Med Appl. 2018;2(5):91–3.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu S, Wang Y, Yang X, Lei B, Liu L, Li S Xiang, Ni D, Wang T. Deep learning in medical ultrasound analysis: a review. Engineering. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2018.11.020.

  5. Buda M, Wildman-Tobriner B, Hoang JK, et al. Management of thyroid nodules seen on US images: deep learning may match performance of radiologists. Radiology. 2019;292(3):695–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cao Z, Duan L, Yang G, et al. Breast tumor detection in ultrasound images using deep learning. In: Proceedings of international workshop on patch-based techniques in medical imaging. 2017. pp. 121–128.

  7. Wang K, Lu X, Zhou H, et al. Deep learning Radiomics of shear wave elastography significantly improved diagnostic performance for assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B: a prospective multicentre study. Gut. 2019;68(4):729–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xi IL, Wu J, Guan J, et al. Deep learning for differentiation of benign and malignant solid liver lesions on ultrasonography. Abdom. Radiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02564-w.

  9. Hu HT, Wang W, et al. Artificial intelligence assists identifying malignant versus benign liver lesions using contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15522.

  10. Zhen S, Cheng M, Tao Y, et al. Deep learning for accurate diagnosis of liver tumor based on magnetic resonance imaging and clinical data. Front Oncol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00680

  11. Yang Q, Wei J, Hao X, et al. Improving B-mode ultrasound diagnostic performance for focal liver lesions using deep learning: a multicentre study. EBioMedicine. 2020;56:102777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sanmamed MF, Chen L. A paradigm shift in cancer immunotherapy: from enhancement to normalization. Cell. 2018;175(2):313–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tzutalin DL. GitHub repository. https://github.com/tzutalin/labelImg Accessed Dec 2017.

  14. Jia D, Wei D, Socher R, et al. ImageNet: a large-scale hierarchical image database. In: Proceedings of IEEE computer vision & pattern recognition (CVPR). 2009. pp. 248–255.

  15. bahdanau D, Cho K, Bengio Y. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. In: Proceedings of international conference on learning representations (ICLR). 2014. arXiv:1409.0473

  16. Yang J, Zhang D, Frangi AF, et al. Two-dimensional PCA: a new approach to appearance-based face representation and recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2004;26(1):131–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hu J, Shen L, Sun G. Squeeze-and-excitation networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE computer vision & pattern recognition (CVPR). 2018. pp. 7132–7141.

  18. LaValley MP. Logistic regression. Circulation. 2008;117(18):2395–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Myung IJ. Tutorial on maximum likelihood estimation. J Math Psychol. 2003;47(1):90–100.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics, to be published. https://doi.org/10.2307/2531595

  21. Paszke A, et al. Pytorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Adv Neural Inform Process Syst. 2019. arXiv:1912.01703

  22. Sanders J, Kandrot E. CUDA by example: an introduction to general-purpose GPU programming. In: Addison-Wesley Professional. 2010.

  23. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of IEEE computer vision & pattern recognition (CVPR). 2016. pp. 770–778.

  24. Simonyan K, Zisserman A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. 2014. arXiv:1409.1556

  25. Howard AG, et al. Mobilenets: efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. 2017. arXiv:1704.04861

  26. Ke A, Ellsworth W, Banerjee O, et al. CheXtransfer: performance and parameter efficiency of ImageNet models for chest X-Ray interpretation. In: Proceedings of the conference on health, inference, and learning (CHIL). 2021. pp. 116–124.

  27. Rigatti SJ. Random forest. J Insur Med. 2017;47(1):31–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Frerichs FT. A clinical treatise on diseases of the liver. In: New Sydenham Society; 1861.

  29. Wang H, Wang Z, Du M, et al. Score-CAM: score-weighted visual explanations for convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops; 2020. pp. 24–25

  30. Yang J. Progress in diagnosis and treatment of liver abscess. Chin J Pract Surg. 2003;23(011):693–4.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Li S, Wang J, Yan Z, et al. Interventional therapy of metastatic liver cancer and its influencing factors. J Med Imag. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3392433

  32. Marchuk DA. Pathogenesis of hemangioma. J Clin Investig. 2001;107(6):665–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61347-0

  34. Mazurowski MA, Habas PA, Zurada JM, et al. Training neural network classifiers for medical decision making: The effects of imbalanced datasets on classification performance. Neural Netw. 2008;21(2):427–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tan, Mingxing, and Quoc Le. "Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks." International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2019.

  36. Bryman, Alan, and Duncan Cramer. Quantitative data analysis with minitab: A guide for social scientists. Routledge, 2003.

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department(202201AY070001)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Statistics and Mathematics, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Longquan Road, Kunming, 650221, Yunnan, China

    Tingting Zhao, Zhiyong Zeng, Tong Li, Xing Yu & Tao Feng

  2. Department of Medical Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Dianmian Road, Kunming, 650101, Yunnan, China

    Wenjing Tao & Rui Bu

Authors
  1. Tingting Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhiyong Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wenjing Tao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xing Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tao Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rui Bu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Tingting Zhao developed the methods and performed the statistical analysis; Tao Feng and Rui Bu designed and supervised the study, Zhiyong Zeng revised the manuscript, and Wenjing Tao, Tong Li, and Xing Yu collected the datasets. All authors contributed to the writing and the interpretation of the results

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tao Feng or Rui Bu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Ethical approval

This research was approved by the authors’ Institutional Review Board (Medical Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University)

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, T., Zeng, Z., Li, T. et al. USC-ENet: a high-efficiency model for the diagnosis of liver tumors combining B-mode ultrasound and clinical data. Health Inf Sci Syst 11, 15 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13755-023-00217-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13755-023-00217-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation