Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Group cognitive-behavioral treatment for internalized weight stigma: a pilot study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This study tested a novel group-based, cognitive-behavioral intervention designed to reduce internalized weight stigma among individuals with obesity.

Methods

A total of eight men and women with obesity who had experienced weight stigma and reported high levels of internalized weight stigma attended the Weight Bias Internalization and Stigma (BIAS) Program. The program provided eight weekly sessions of cognitive-behavioral treatment to cope with weight stigma. Participants completed questionnaires pre- and post-intervention, including the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS), Fat Phobia Scale, Weight Efficacy Life-Style Questionnaire (WEL), and Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Six additional participants were included in a quasi-control group that received no intervention until after completing all study measures.

Results

Participants in the Weight BIAS Program reported significantly greater decreases in WBIS and Fat Phobia scores, and greater increases in WEL scores than participants in the quasi-control group (ps < .04). Changes in BDI-II scores did not differ between groups. Treatment-acceptability ratings were high among participants who received the intervention.

Conclusion

Including cognitive-behavioral strategies to address weight stigma in weight management programs could potentially reduce internalized weight stigma and enhance treatment outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. One participant in the intervention group had a BMI of 29.7 kg/m2.

  2. Post-intervention weights were not obtained for two quasi-control group participants.

References

  1. Puhl R, Suh Y (2015) Health consequences of weight stigma: implications for obesity prevention and treatment. Curr Obes Rep 4:182–190. doi:10.1007/s13679-015-0153-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sutin AR, Stephan Y, Terracciano A (2015) Weight discrimination and mortality. Psychol Sci 26(11):1803–1811. doi:10.1177/0956797615601103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Durso LE, Latner JD (2008) Understanding self-directed stigma: Development of the Weight Bias Internalization Scale. Obesity 16(S2):S80–S86. doi:10.1038/oby.2008.448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Papadopoulos S, Brennan L (2015) Correlates of weight stigma in adults with overweight and obesity: a systematic literature review. Obesity 23:1743–1760. doi:10.1002/oby.21187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Brien KS, Latner JD, Puhl RM, Vartanian LR, Giles C, Griva K, Carter A (2016) The relationship between weight stigma and eating behavior is explained by weight bias internalization and psychological distress. Appetite 102:70–76. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pearl RL, Puhl RM (2016) The distinct effects of internalizing weight bias: An experimental study. Body Imag 17:38–42. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Corrigan PW, Larson JE, Rusch N (2009) Self-stigma and the “why try” effect: impact on life goals and evidence-based practices. World Psychiatry 8(2):75–81. doi:10.1002/j.2051-5545.2009.tb00218.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hubner C, Baldofski S, Zenger M, Tigges W, Herbig B, Jurowich C, Kaiser S, Dietrich A, Hilbert A (2015) Influences of general self-efficacy and weight bias internalization on physical activity in bariatric surgery candidates. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11(6):1371–1376. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2014.11.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mensinger JL, Calogero RM, Tylka TL (2016) Internalized weight stigma moderates eating behavior outcomes in women with high BMI participating in a healthy living program. Appetite 102:32–43. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.01.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carels RA, Burmeister JM, Koball A, Oehlhof MW, Hinman N, LeRoy M, Bannon E, Ashrafloun L, Storfer-Isser A, Darby LA, Gumble A (2014) A randomized controlled trial comparing two approaches to weight loss: differences in weight loss maintenance. J Health Psychol 19(2):296–311. doi:10.1177/1359105312470156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mittal D, Sullivan G, Chekuri L, Allee E, Corrigan PW (2012) Empirical studies of self-stigma reduction strategies: a critical review. Psychiatr Serv 63(10):974–981. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201100459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Puhl RM, Heuer C, Sarda V (2011) Framing messages about weight discrimination: impact on public support for legislation. Int J Obes 35(6):863–872. doi:10.1038/ijo.2010.194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK (1996) Manual for the BDI-II. Psychological Corporation, San Antonio

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42(2):377–381. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bacon JG, Scheltema KE, Robinson BE (2001) Fat phobia scale revisited: the short form. Int J Obes 25:252–257. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0801537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Clark MM, Abrams DB, Niaura RS, Eaton CA, Rossi JS (1991) Self-efficacy in weight management. J Consult Clin Psychol 59(5):739–744. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.59.5.739

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca L. Pearl.

Ethics declarations

Funding

None to report.

Conflict of interest

TAW discloses serving on advisory boards for Novo Nordisk, Nutrisystem, and Weight Watchers, as well as receiving grant support, on behalf of the University of Pennsylvania, from Eisai Pharmaceutical Co. None of the other authors declares any conflicts.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 64 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pearl, R.L., Hopkins, C.H., Berkowitz, R.I. et al. Group cognitive-behavioral treatment for internalized weight stigma: a pilot study. Eat Weight Disord 23, 357–362 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-016-0336-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-016-0336-y

Keywords

Navigation