Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Mdm2–SUMO1: is bigger better?

Covalent modification of the oncogene product Mdm2 by the ubiquitin-related protein SUMO1 protects it from ubiquitination and enhances its E3 ligase activity towards p53 in vitro. Disappearance of SUMO-modified Mdm2, which is observed upon radiation, may thus be a prerequisite for DNA-damage-induced accumulation of p53.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Reversible protein modification with the ubiquitin-related protein SUMO.
Figure 2: Destructive pathways: SUMOylation of Mdm2 and degradation of p53.

References

  1. Oren, M. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 36031–36034 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Momand, J., Wu, H. H. & Dasgupta, G. Gene 242, 15– 29 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Buschmann, T., Fuchs, S. Y., Lee, C. C., Pan, Z. Q. & Ronai, Z. Cell 101, 753– 762 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hochstrasser, M. Nature Cell Biol. 2, E153–E157 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yeh, E. T., Gong, L. & Kamitani, T. Gene 248, 1– 14 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Melchior, F. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 16, 591– 626 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jentsch, S. & Pyrowolakis, G. Trends Cell Biol. 10, 335–342 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Selter, H., Amela-Neuschwander, S., Villena-Heinsen, C. & Montenarh, M. Cancer Lett. 96, 111–115 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharp, D. A., Kratowicz, S. A., Sank, M. J. & George, D. L. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 38189–38196 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lohrum, M. A., Ashcroft, M., Kubbutat, M. H. & Vousden, K. H. Nature Cell Biol. 2, 179–181 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Podust, V. N. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4579– 4584 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tanimura, S. et al. FEBS Lett. 447, 5– 9 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hsieh, J. K. et al. Mol. Cell 3, 181–193 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Grossman, S. R. et al. Mol. Cell 2, 405–415 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Honda, R. & Yasuda, H. EMBO J. 18, 22–27 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Erhardt, P., Tomaselli, K. J. & Cooper, G. M. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 15049– 15052 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melchior, F., Hengst, L. Mdm2–SUMO1: is bigger better?. Nat Cell Biol 2, E161–E163 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35023639

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35023639

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing