Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Animal behaviour

Cognitive bias and affective state

Abstract

Information processing by humans can be biased by their emotions — for example, anxious and depressed people tend to make negative judgements about events and to interpret ambiguous stimuli unfavourably1,2,3,4. Here we show that such a 'pessimistic' response bias can also be measured in rats that are housed in unpredictable conditions5,6. Our findings indicate that cognitive bias can be used as an indicator of affective state in animals, which should facilitate progress in animal-welfare studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Mean (±1 s.e.) responses to tones during 10 daily 30-min test sessions for male Lister hooded rats housed under 'predictable' (open circles, n = 4) and 'unpredictable' (filled circles, n = 5) conditions.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MacLeod, A. K. & Byrne, A. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 105, 286–289 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gotlib, I. H. & Krasnoperova, E. Behav. Therapy 29, 603–617 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eysenck, M. W. et al. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 100, 144–150 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wright, W. F. & Bower, G. H. Organiz. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process 62, 276–291 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Willner, P. Psychopharmacology 134, 319–329 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zurita, A. et al. Behav. Brain Res. 117, 163–171 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nielsen, B. L. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 63, 79–91 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fernandes, C. & File, S. E. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 54, 31–40 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Spruijt, B. M., van den Bos, R. & Pijlman, F. T. A. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 72, 145–171 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Berridge, K. C. & Robinson, T. E. Trends Neurosci. 26, 507–513 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dawkins, M. S. in Coping with Challenge. Welfare in Animals including Humans (ed. Broom, D.M.) 63–76 (Dahlem University Press, Berlin, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Mendl.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harding, E., Paul, E. & Mendl, M. Cognitive bias and affective state. Nature 427, 312 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/427312a

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/427312a

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing