Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The cell-cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1 is required for mammalian homologous recombination repair

Nature Cell Biology volume 7, pages 195–201 (2005)Cite this article

Abstract

The essential checkpoint kinase Chk1 is required for cell-cycle delays after DNA damage or blocked DNA replication1,2. However, it is unclear whether Chk1 is involved in the repair of damaged DNA. Here we establish that Chk1 is a key regulator of genome maintenance by the homologous recombination repair (HRR) system. Abrogation of Chk1 function with small interfering RNA or chemical antagonists inhibits HRR, leading to persistent unrepaired DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and cell death after replication inhibition with hydroxyurea or DNA-damage caused by camptothecin. After hydroxyurea treatment, the essential recombination repair protein RAD51 is recruited to DNA repair foci performing a vital role in correct HRR3,4. We demonstrate that Chk1 interacts with RAD51, and that RAD51 is phosphorylated on Thr 309 in a Chk1-dependent manner. Consistent with a functional interplay between Chk1 and RAD51, Chk1-depleted cells failed to form RAD51 nuclear foci after exposure to hydroxyurea, and cells expressing a phosphorylation-deficient mutant RAD51T309A were hypersensitive to hydroxyurea. These results highlight a crucial role for the Chk1 signalling pathway in protecting cells against lethal DNA lesions through regulation of HRR.

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: A Chk1 signal to homologous recombination is required for survival after DNA damage and replication arrest.
Figure 2: Inhibition of Chk1 leads to increased accumulation of replication-associated DSBs and failure to repair DSBs after HU treatment.
Figure 3: Chk1 is required for RAD51 foci formation after hydroxyurea treatment.
Figure 4: Chk1 directly regulates RAD51.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abraham, R. T. Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases. Genes Dev. 15, 2177–2196 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bartek, J. & Lukas, J. Chk1 and Chk2 kinases in checkpoint control and cancer. Cancer Cell 3, 421–429 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. West, S. C. Molecular views of recombination proteins and their control. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 435–445 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Saintigny, Y. et al. Characterization of homologous recombination induced by replication inhibition in mammalian cells. EMBO J. 20, 3861–3870 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, Q. et al. Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G2/M DNA damage checkpoint. Genes Dev. 14, 1448–1459 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Takai, H. et al. Aberrant cell cycle checkpoint function and early embryonic death in Chk1−/− mice. Genes Dev. 14, 1439–1447 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao, H. & Piwnica-Worms, H. ATR-mediated checkpoint pathways regulate phosphorylation and activation of human Chk1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 4129–4139 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown, E. J. & Baltimore, D. Essential and dispensable roles of ATR in cell cycle arrest and genome maintenance. Genes Dev. 17, 615–628 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Casper, A. M., Nghiem, P., Arlt, M. F. & Glover, T. W. ATR regulates fragile site stability. Cell 111, 779–789 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Katou, Y. et al. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424, 1078–1083 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tercero, J. A. & Diffley, J. F. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 412, 553–557 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lopes, M. et al. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 412, 557–561 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Feijoo, C. et al. Activation of mammalian Chk1 during DNA replication arrest: a role for Chk1 in the intra-S phase checkpoint monitoring replication origin firing. J. Cell Biol. 154, 913–923 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson, R. D. & Jasin, M. Sister chromatid gene conversion is a prominent double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells. EMBO J. 19, 3398–3407 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lundin, C. et al. Different roles for nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination following replication arrest in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 5869–5878 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sonoda, E. et al. Rad51-deficient vertebrate cells accumulate chromosomal breaks prior to cell death. EMBO J. 17, 598–608 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Arnaudeau, C., Lundin, C. & Helleday, T. DNA double-strand breaks associated with replication forks are predominantly repaired by homologous recombination involving an exchange mechanism in mammalian cells. J. Mol. Biol. 307, 1235–1245 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cliby, W. A. et al. Overexpression of a kinase-inactive ATR protein causes sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents and defects in cell cycle checkpoints. EMBO J. 17, 159–169 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sarkaria, J. N. et al. Inhibition of ATM and ATR kinase activities by the radiosensitizing agent, caffeine. Cancer Res. 59, 4375–4382 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Busby, E. C., Leistritz, D. F., Abraham, R. T., Karnitz, L. M. & Sarkaria, J. N. The radiosensitizing agent 7-hydroxystaurosporine (UCN-01) inhibits the DNA damage checkpoint kinase hChk1. Cancer Res. 60, 2108–2112 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mohindra, A. et al. Defects in homologous recombination repair in mismatch-repair-deficient tumour cell lines. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11, 2189–2200 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tebbs, R. S. et al. Correction of chromosomal instability and sensitivity to diverse mutagens by a cloned cDNA of the XRCC3 DNA repair gene Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 6354–6358 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Jackson, S. P. Sensing and repairing DNA double-strand breaks. Carcinogenesis 23, 687–696 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sørensen, C. S. et al. Chk1 regulates the S phase checkpoint by coupling the physiological turnover and ionizing radiation-induced accelerated proteolysis of Cdc25A. Cancer Cell 3, 247–258 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Saleh-Gohari, N. & Helleday, T. Conservative homologous recombination preferrentially repairs DNA double-strand breaks in the S phase of the cell cycle in human cells. Nucleic Acid Res. 32, 3683–3688 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Haaf, T., Golub, E. I., Reddy, G., Radding, C. M. & Ward, D. C. Nuclear foci of mammalian Rad51 recombination protein in somatic cells after DNA damage and its localization in synaptonemal complexes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 2298–2302 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Sigurdsson, S. et al. Mediator function of the human Rad51B–Rad51C complex in Rad51/RPA-catalyzed DNA strand exchange. Genes Dev. 15, 3308–3318 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Brown, E. J. & Baltimore, D. ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality. Genes Dev. 14, 397–402 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. de Klein, A. et al. Targeted disruption of the cell-cycle checkpoint gene ATR leads to early embryonic lethality in mice. Curr. Biol. 10, 479–482 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tsuzuki, T. et al. Targeted disruption of the Rad51 gene leads to lethality in embryonic mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 6236–6240 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Luo, G. et al. Disruption of mRad50 causes embryonic stem cell lethality, abnormal embryonic development, and sensitivity to ionizing radiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 7376–7381 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Deans, B., Griffin, C. S., Maconochie, M. & Thacker, J. Xrcc2 is required for genetic stability, embryonic neurogenesis and viability in mice. EMBO J. 19, 6675–6685 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Jasin for the SCneo and pCMV3xnlsI-SceI vectors, L. Thompson for cell lines and the Danish Cancer Society, the Novo Nordisk Foundation, the European Union, the Danish Medical Research Council, Dansk Kraeftforskningsfond, the Swedish Cancer Society, the Swedish Research Council, the Biological & Biotechnological Sciences Research Council and Yorkshire Cancer Research for grant support.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Claus Storgaard Sørensen

    Present address: The Biotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC), Fruebjergvej 3, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark

  2. Claus Storgaard Sørensen and Lasse Tengbjerg Hansen: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Danish Cancer Society, Institute of Cancer Biology, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark

    Claus Storgaard Sørensen, Randi G. Syljuåsen & Jiri Bartek

  2. Institute of Molecular Pathology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark

    Lasse Tengbjerg Hansen

  3. The Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK

    Jaroslaw Dziegielewski & Thomas Helleday

  4. Department of Genetics Microbiology and Toxicology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, S-106 91, Sweden

    Cecilia Lundin & Thomas Helleday

Authors
  1. Claus Storgaard Sørensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lasse Tengbjerg Hansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jaroslaw Dziegielewski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Randi G. Syljuåsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cecilia Lundin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jiri Bartek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. Thomas Helleday
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jiri Bartek or Thomas Helleday.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Fig S1, Fig S2, Fig S3, Table S1 (PDF 427 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sørensen, C., Hansen, L., Dziegielewski, J. et al. The cell-cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1 is required for mammalian homologous recombination repair. Nat Cell Biol 7, 195–201 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1212

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1212

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing