Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

High interstitial fluid pressure — an obstacle in cancer therapy

Nature Reviews Cancer volume 4, pages 806–813 (2004)Cite this article

Key Points

  • Transcapillary flow, which is important for tissue homeostasis, is influenced by the hydrostatic and colloid osmotic pressures of capillaries and interstitium.

  • The interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) of normal tissues is actively regulated through interactions between stromal cells and the extracellular-matrix molecules.

  • Most solid tumours have increased IFP.

  • The reasons for increased tumour IFP include blood-vessel leakiness, lymph-vessel abnormalities, interstitial fibrosis and a contraction of the interstitial matrix mediated by stromal fibroblasts.

  • Increased tumour IFP causes inefficient uptake of therapeutic agents.

  • Lowering of tumour IFP — for example, by certain cytokine antagonists — can improve drug uptake and thereby improve treatment efficiency.

Abstract

Many solid tumours show an increased interstitial fluid pressure (IFP), which forms a barrier to transcapillary transport. This barrier is an obstacle in tumour treatment, as it results in inefficient uptake of therapeutic agents. There are a number of factors that contribute to increased IFP in the tumour, such as vessel abnormalities, fibrosis and contraction of the interstitial matrix. Lowering the tumour IFP with specific signal-transduction antagonists might be a useful approach to improving anticancer drug efficacy.

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Forces that regulate transcapillary transport in tissues.
Figure 2: Structural differences between normal and tumour tissues that affect interstitial fluid pressure.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Young, J. S. et al. The significance of the tissue pressure of normal testicular and of neoplastic (Brown–Pearce carcinoma) tissue in the rabbit. J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 62, 313–333 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jain, R. K. Transport of molecules across tumor vasculature. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 6, 559–593 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jain, R. K. Transport of molecules in the tumor interstitium: a review. Cancer Res. 47, 3039–3051 (1987). References 2 and 3 were the first to propose that the increased IFP of some tumours is a barrier to drug delivery.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Less, J. R. et al. Interstitial hypertension in human breast and colorectal tumors. Cancer Res. 52, 6371–6374 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nathanson, S. D. et al. Interstitial fluid pressure in breast cancer, benign breast conditions, and breast parenchyma. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 1, 333–338 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Curti, B. D. et al. Interstitial pressure of subcutaneous nodules in melanoma and lymphoma patients: changes during treatment. Cancer Res. 53, 2204–2207 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boucher, Y. et al. Interstitial hypertension in superficial metastatic melanomas in humans. Cancer Res. 51, 6691–6694 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gutmann, R. et al. Interstitial hypertension in head and neck tumors in patients: correlation with tumor size. Cancer Res. 52, 1993–1995 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jain, R. K. The next frontier of molecular medicine: delivery of therapeutics. Nature Med. 4, 655–657 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jain, R. K. Barriers to drug delivery in solid tumors. Sci. Am. 271, 58–65 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Boucher, Y. et al. Interstitial pressure gradients in tissue-isolated and subcutaneous tumors: implications for therapy. Cancer Res. 50, 4478–4484 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. DiResta, G. R. et al. Characterization of neuroblastoma xenograft in rat flank. I. Growth, interstitial fluid pressure, and interstitial fluid velocity distribution profiles. Microvasc. Res. 46, 158–177 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rippe, B. et al. Transport of macromolecules across microvascular walls: the two-pore theory. Physiol. Rev. 74, 163–219 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Roh, H. D. et al. Interstitial hypertension in carcinoma of uterine cervix in patients: possible correlation with tumor oxygenation and radiation response. Cancer Res. 51, 6695–6698 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Milosevic, M. et al. Interstitial fluid pressure predicts survival in patients with cervix cancer independent of clinical prognostic factors and tumor oxygen measurements. Cancer Res. 61, 6400–6405 (2001).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Aukland, K. et al. Interstitial-lymphatic mechanisms in the control of extracellular fluid volume. Physiol. Rev. 73, 1–78 (1993). A thorough and complete review of the mechanisms that control extracellular fluid flow and interstitial fluid pressure.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chary, S. R. et al. Direct measurement of interstitial convection and diffusion of albumin in normal and neoplastic tissues by fluorescence photobleaching. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 5385–5389 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lund, T. et al. Acute postburn edema: role of strongly negative interstitial fluid pressure. Am. J. Physiol. 255, H1069–H1074 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wiig, H. et al. New and active role of the interstitium in control of interstitial fluid pressure: potential therapeutic consequences. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 47, 111–121 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Reed, R. K. et al. Control of interstitial fluid pressure: role of β1-integrins. Semin. Nephrol. 21, 222–230 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Meyer, F. A. Macromolecular basis of globular protein exclusion and of swelling pressure in loose connective tissue (umbilical cord). Biochim. Biophys. Acta 755, 388–399 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Steinberg, B. M. et al. Establishment and transformation diminish the ability of fibroblasts to contract a native collagen gel. J. Cell Biol. 87, 304–308 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Clark, R. A. F. et al. Platelet isoforms of platelet-derived growth factor stimulate fibroblasts to contract collagen matrices. J. Clin. Invest. 84, 1036–1040 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gullberg, D. et al. β1 Integrin-mediated collagen gel contraction is stimulated by PDGF. Exp. Cell Res. 186, 264–272 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Montesano, R. et al. Transforming growth factor β stimulates collagen-matrix contraction by fibroblasts: implications for wound healing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 85, 4894–4897 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Grundstrom, G. et al. Integrin αvβ3 mediates platelet-derived growth factor-BB-stimulated collagen gel contraction in cells expressing signaling deficient integrin α2β1. Exp. Cell Res. 291, 463–473 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Reed, R. K. et al. Blockade of β1-integrins in skin causes edema through lowering of interstitial fluid pressure. Circ. Res. 71, 978–983 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rodt, S. Å. et al. A novel physiological function for platelet-derived growth factor-BB in rat dermis. J. Physiol. 495, 193–200 (1996). Demonstration that PDGF-BB controls the IFP of normal tissue.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Heuchel, R. et al. Platelet-derived growth factor β receptor regulates interstitial fluid homeostasis through phosphatidylinositol-3′ kinase signaling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 11410–11415 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wennström, S. et al. Membrane ruffling and chemotaxis transduced by the PDGFβ-receptor require the binding site for phosphatidylinositol 3′ kinase. Oncogene 9, 651–660 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Berg, A. et al. Cytochalasin D induces edema formation and lowering of interstitial fluid pressure in rat dermis. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 281, H7–H13 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Berg, A. et al. Effect of PGE1, PGI2, and PGF2 α analogs on collagen gel compaction in vitro and interstitial pressure in vivo. Am. J. Physiol. 274, H663–H671 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jain, R. K. Delivery of molecular and cellular medicine to solid tumors. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 46, 149–168 (2001). An authoritative review of the effect on drug uptake of high IFP in tumours.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Baluk, P. et al. Abnormalities of basement membrane on blood vessels and endothelial sprouts in tumors. Am. J. Pathol. 163, 1801–1815 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Abramsson, A. et al. Analysis of mural cell recruitment to tumor vessels. Circulation 105, 112–117 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Morikawa, S. et al. Abnormalities in pericytes on blood vessels and endothelial sprouts in tumors. Am. J. Pathol. 160, 985–1000 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Griffon-Etienne, G. et al. Taxane-induced apoptosis decompresses blood vessels and lowers interstitial fluid pressure in solid tumors: clinical implications. Cancer Res. 59, 3776–3782 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Padera, T. P. et al. Pathology: cancer cells compress intratumour vessels. Nature 427, 695 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Boucher, Y. et al. Lack of general correlation between interstitial fluid pressure and oxygen partial pressure in solid tumors. Microvasc. Res. 50, 175–182 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Dvorak, H. F. et al. Vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor, microvascular hyperpermeability, and angiogenesis. Am. J. Pathol. 146, 1029–1039 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Stohrer, M. et al. Oncotic pressure in solid tumors is elevated. Cancer Res. 60, 4251–4255 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Alitalo, K. et al. Molecular mechanisms of lymphangiogenesis in health and disease. Cancer Cell 1, 219–227 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Padera, T. P. et al. Lymphatic metastasis in the absence of functional intratumor lymphatics. Science 296, 1883–1886 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Leu, A. J. et al. Absence of functional lymphatics within a murine sarcoma: a molecular and functional evaluation. Cancer Res. 60, 4324–4327 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Boucher, Y. et al. Microvascular pressure is the principal driving force for interstitial hypertension in solid tumors: implications for vascular collapse. Cancer Res. 52, 5110–5114 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gabbiani, G. The myofibroblast in wound healing and fibrocontractive diseases. J. Pathol. 200, 500–503 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Netti, P. A. et al. Enhancement of fluid filtration across tumor vessels: implication for delivery of macromolecules. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 3137–3142 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Lee, C. G. et al. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment augments tumor radiation response under normoxic or hypoxic conditions. Cancer Res. 60, 5565–5570 (2000).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Tong, R. T. et al. Vascular normalization by vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 blockade induces a pressure gradient across the vasculature and improves drug penetration in tumors. Cancer Res. 64, 3731–3736 (2004). Reports that vessel normalization after VEGF-antagonist treatment induces favourable transvascular hydrostatic pressure gradient in tumours.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Wildiers, H. et al. Effect of antivascular endothelial growth factor treatment on the intratumoral uptake of CPT-11. Br. J. Cancer 88, 1979–1986 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Willett, C. G. et al. Direct evidence that the VEGF-specific antibody bevacizumab has antivascular effects in human rectal cancer. Nature Med. 10, 145–147 (2004). Describes the first analysis of the effect of a VEGF antagonist on tumour vasculature and IFP in patients.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Inai, T. et al. Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling in cancer causes loss of endothelial fenestrations, regression of tumor vessels, and appearance of basement membrane ghosts. Am. J. Pathol. 165, 35–52 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Pietras, K. et al. Inhibition of platelet-derived growth factor receptors reduces interstitial hypertension and increases transcapillary transport in tumors. Cancer Res. 61, 2929–2934 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Pietras, K. et al. Inhibition of PDGF receptor signaling in tumor stroma enhances antitumor effect of chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 62, 5476–5484 (2002). Demonstrates that PDGF antagonists lower tumour IFP, as well as increase drug uptake and treatment efficiency in preclinical models.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Pietras, K. et al. STI571 enhances the therapeutic index of epothilone B by a tumor-selective increase of drug uptake. Clin. Cancer Res. 9, 3779–3787 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Pietras, K. Increasing tumor uptake of drugs with imatinib. Semin. Oncol. 31, 18–23 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Lindahl, P. et al. Pericyte loss and microaneurysm formation in PDGF-B-deficient mice. Science 277, 242–245 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Abramsson, A. et al. Endothelial and nonendothelial sources of PDGF-B regulate pericyte recruitment and influence vascular pattern formation in tumors. J. Clin. Invest. 112, 1142–11451 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Guo, P. et al. Platelet-derived growth factor-B enhances glioma angiogenesis by stimulating vascular endothelial growth factor expression in tumor endothelia and by promoting pericyte recruitment. Am. J. Pathol. 162, 1083–1093 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Furuhashi, M. et al. Platelet-derived growth factor production by B16 melanoma cells leads to increased pericyte abundance in tumors and an associated increase in tumor growth rate. Cancer Res. 64, 2725–2733 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Lammerts, E. et al. Interference with TGF-β1 and -β3 in tumor stroma lowers tumor interstitial fluid pressure independently of growth in experimental carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 102, 453–462 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Jacobson, A. et al. Hyaluronan content in experimental carcinoma is not correlated to interstitial fluid pressure. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 305, 1017–1023 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Eikenes, L. et al. Collagenase increases the transcapillary pressure gradient and improves the uptake and distribution of monoclonal antibodies in human osteosarcoma xenografts. Cancer Res. 64, 4768–4773 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Kristensen, C. A. et al. Reduction of interstitial fluid pressure after TNF-α treatment of three human melanoma xenografts. Br. J. Cancer 74, 533–536 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Curnis, F. et al. Improving chemotherapeutic drug penetration in tumors by vascular targeting and barrier alteration. J. Clin. Invest. 110, 475–482 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Brekken, C. et al. Hyaluronidase-induced periodic modulation of the interstitial fluid pressure increases selective antibody uptake in human osteosarcoma xenografts. Anticancer Res. 20, 3513–3519 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Brekken, C. et al. Interstitial fluid pressure in human osteosarcoma xenografts: significance of implantation site and the response to intratumoral injection of hyaluronidase. Anticancer Res. 20, 3503–3512 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Brekken, C. et al. Hyaluronidase reduces the interstitial fluid pressure in solid tumours in a non-linear concentration-dependent manner. Cancer Lett. 131, 65–70 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Kristjansen, P. E. G. et al. Dexamethasone reduces the interstitial fluid pressure in a human colon adenocarcinoma xenograft. Cancer Res. 53, 4764–4766 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Emerich, D. F. et al. Bradykinin modulation of tumor vasculature: II. activation of nitric oxide and phospholipase A2/prostaglandin signaling pathways synergistically modifies vascular physiology and morphology to enhance delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to tumors. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 296, 632–641 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Lee, I. et al. Nicotinamide can lower tumor interstitial fluid pressure: mechanistic and therapeutic implications. Cancer Res. 52, 3237–3240 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Rubin, K. et al. Lowering of tumoral interstitial fluid pressure by prostaglandin E1 is paralleled by an increased uptake of 51Cr–EDTA. Int. J. Cancer 86, 636–643 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Salnikov, A. V. et al. Lowering of tumor interstitial fluid pressure specifically augments efficacy of chemotherapy. FASEB J. 17, 1756–1758 (2003). Demonstration that prostaglandin E 1 lowers tumour IFP and increases treatment efficiency in preclinical models.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Thurston, G. et al. Angiopoietin-1 protects the adult vasculature against plasma leakage. Nature Med. 6, 460–463 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Kristensen, C. A. et al. Reduction of interstitial fluid pressure after TNF-α treatment of three human melanoma xenografts. Br. J. Cancer 74, 533–536 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank I. Schiller for skilful help in the preparation of this manuscript. Work in the authors laboratories were, in part, supported by funds from the Swedish Cancer Society. The authors also thank editors and anonymous reviewers for valuable suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Box 595, Uppsala, SE-751 24, Sweden

    Carl-Henrik Heldin

  2. Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, BMC, Box 582, Uppsala, SE-751 23, Sweden

    Kristofer Rubin

  3. University of California, San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, HSW 1090-Box 0534, San Francisco, 94143, California, USA

    Kristian Pietras

  4. Department of Pathology-Oncology, Cancer Center Karolinska, R8:03, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, SE-171 76, Sweden

    Arne Östman

Authors
  1. Carl-Henrik Heldin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kristofer Rubin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kristian Pietras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Arne Östman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl-Henrik Heldin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Related links

Related links

DATABASES

Cancer.gov

breast cancer

cervical cancer

colorectal cancer

head and neck cancer

melanoma

Entrez Gene

ANG1

PDGF

PDGFRβ

TGFβ

TNFα

VEGF

FURTHER INFORMATION

Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Uppsala Branch

Glossary

COLLOID OSMOTIC PRESSURE

A pressure built up by the tendency of water to diffuse through a semipermeable membrane into a compartment with higher concentration of high-molecular-weight molecules, like proteins, that are unable to pass through the membrane.

HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

A measure of the permeability of the vessel wall for water.

PROTEIN REFLEXION COEFFICIENT

A measure of the impermeability of the capillary vessel wall for proteins.

STARLING'S FORCES

Starling's hypothesis describes the transcapillary fluid flux, Jv, as Jv = Lp × S × ΔP, where Lp is the hydraulic conductivity of the capillary membrane and S is the surface area for exchange. ΔP is the net pressure difference determined by ΔP = (PCAP − PIF) − σ(COPCAP − COPIF), where PCAP and PIF are the hydrostatic pressures in capillaries and interstitium, respectively; COPCAP and COPIF are the colloid osmotic pressures of capillaries and interstitium, respectively; and σ is the plasmaprotein reflexion coefficient for proteins.

INTEGRINS

Transmembrane receptors, consisting of different combinations of α- and β-subunits. Many bind different extracellular-matrix proteins, such as collagen, fibronectin and laminin.

HYALURONAN

A large linear polysaccharide of repeating disaccharide units. It crosslinks proteoglycans and so contributes to the elasticity of tissues.

PERICYTES

Mural cells present in capillaries and venules that are embedded in the basal lamina and also form close contact with endothelial cells. Pericytes are recruited to blood vessels by PDGF-BB produced by endothelial cells.

ANGIOTENSIN II

A short peptide that, after cleavage from its precursor, binds to a G-protein-coupled receptor present on vascular smooth muscle cells and increases the blood pressure.

DNA APTAMER

A DNA molecule of 20–40 nucleotides, obtained by a repeated selection procedure, which specifically binds other molecules with high affinity.

HYDROXYPROLINE

A post-translationally modified amino acid, hydroxylated proline, often detected in collagen.

51Cr-EDTA

A low-molecular-weight compound that is widely used as a tracer for extracellular fluid. It is not taken up by cells and distributes freely between blood and interstitial fluids.

MICRODIALYSIS

A method to determine transport of low-molecular-weight compounds from blood to tissues. A small dialysis probe, usually about 0.3 × 5 mm is inserted in the tissue and connected to a pump. The concentration of the low-molecular-weight compound in the dialysate is determined and related to the concentration in blood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heldin, CH., Rubin, K., Pietras, K. et al. High interstitial fluid pressure — an obstacle in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 4, 806–813 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1456

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1456

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing