Signatures of Domain Shuffling in the Human Genome

  1. Henrik Kaessmann1,3,
  2. Sebastian Zöllner2,
  3. Anton Nekrutenko1, and
  4. Wen-Hsiung Li1
  1. 1Department of Ecology and Evolution, and 2Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA

Abstract

To elucidate the role of exon shuffling in shaping the complexity of the human genome/proteome, we have systematically analyzed intron phase distributions in the coding sequence of human protein domains. We found that introns at the boundaries of domains show high excess of symmetrical phase combinations (i.e., 0–0, 1–1, and 2–2), whereas nonboundary introns show no excess symmetry. This suggests that exon shuffling has primarily involved rearrangement of structural and functional domains as a whole. Furthermore, we found that domains flanked by phase 1 introns have dramatically expanded in the human genome due to domain shuffling and that 1–1 symmetrical domains and domain families are nonrandomly distributed with respect to their age. The predominance and extracellular location of 1–1 symmetrical domains among domains specific to metazoans suggests that they are associated with the rise of multicellularity. On the other hand, 0–0 symmetrical domains tend to be over-represented among ancient protein domains that are shared between the eukaryotic and prokaryotic kingdoms, which is compatible with the suggestion of primordial domain shuffling in the progenote. To see whether the human data reflect general genomic patterns of metazoans, similar analyses were done for the nematodeCaenorhabditis elegans. Although the C. elegans data generally concur with the human patterns, we identified fewer intron-bounded domains in this organism, consistent with the lower complexity of C. elegans genes.

[The following individuals kindly provided reagents, samples, or unpublished information as indicated in the paper: Z. Gu and R. Stevens.]

Footnotes

  • 3 Corresponding author.

  • E-MAIL kaessm{at}uchicago.edu; FAX (773) 702-9740.

  • Article and publication are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.520702.

    • Received June 10, 2002.
    • Accepted September 13, 2002.
| Table of Contents