Abstract
We examined the possibility that eyewitness suggestibility reflects failures of the processes by which people normally discriminate between memories derived from different sources. To test this hypothesis, misled and control subjects were tested either with a yes/no recognition test or with a “source monitoring” test designed to orient subjects to attend to information about the sources of their memories. The results demonstrate that suggestibility effects obtained with a recognition test can be eliminated by orienting subjects toward thinking about the sources of their memories while taking the test. Our findings indicate that although misled subjects are capable of identifying the source of their memories of misleading suggestions, they nonetheless sometimes misidentify them as memories derived from the original event. The extent to which such errors reflect genuine memory confusions (produced, for example, by lax judgment criteria) or conscious misattributions (perhaps due to demand characteristics) remains to be specified.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abra, J. C. (1972). List differentiation and forgetting. In C. P. Duncan, L. Sechrest, & A. W. Melton (Eds.),Human memory: Festschrift for Benton J. Underwood (pp. 25–57). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Alba, J. W. (1984). Nature of inference representation.American Journal of Psychology,97, 215–233.
Atkinson, R. C., &Juola, J. F (1973). Factors influencing speed and accuracy of word recognition. In S. Kornblum (Ed.),Attention and performance IV (pp. 583–612). New York: Academic Press.
Bekerian, D. A., &Bowers, J. M. (1983). Eyewitness testimony: Were we misled?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 139–145.
Brown, E., Deffenbacher, K., &Sturgill, W. (1977). Memory for faces and the circumstances of encounter.Journal of Applied Psychology,62, 311–318.
Christlaansen, R. E., &Ochalek, K. (1983). Editing misleading Information from memory: Evidence for the coexistence of original and post-event information.Memory & Cognition,11, 467–475.
Crowder, R. G. (1976).Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fisher, R. P., &Cuervo, A. (1983). Memory for physical features of discourse as a function of their relevance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 130–138.
Geiselman, R. E., &Crawley, J. J. (1983). Incidental processing of speaker characteristics: Voice as connotative information.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 15–23.
Hasher, L., &Griffin, M. (1978). Reconstructive and reproductive processes in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 318–330.
Hashtroudi, S., Johnson, M. K., &Chrosniak, L. (1989). Aging and source monitoring.Psychology & Aging,4, 106–112.
Jacoby, L. L., &Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 306–340.
Johnson, M. K. (1988). Discriminating the origin of information. In T. F. Oltmanns & B. A. Maher (Eds.),Delusional beliefs: Interdisciplinary perspectives. New York: Wiley.
Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., &Leach, K. (1988). The consequences for memory of Imagining in another person's voice.Memory & Cognition,16, 337–342.
Johnson, M. K., &Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring.Psychological Review,88, 67–85.
Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Wang, A. Y., &Taylor, T. H. (1979). Fact and fantasy: The roles of accuracy and variability in confusing imaginations with perceptual experiences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 229–240.
Lindsay, D. S. (1987).Whence comes this memory? Unpublished doctoral thesis. Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Lindsay, D. S., &Johnson, M. K. (1989a). The reversed suggestibility effect.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,27, 111–113.
Lindsay, D. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1989b).Source monitoring Manuscript in preparation.
Loftus, E. F. (1975). Leading questions and the eyewitness reportCognitive Psychology;7, 560–572.
Loftus, E. F. (1979).Eyewitness testimony, Cambridge, MA: Wiley.
Loftus, E. F. (1981). Mentalmorphosis: Alterations in memory produced by the mental bonding of new information to old. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX (pp. 417–434) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lofts, E. F., &Loftus, G. R. (1980). On the permanence of stored information in the human brain.American Psychologist,35, 409–420
Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., &Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 19–31.
McCloskey, M., &Zaragoza, M. (1985a). Misleading postevent information and memory for events: Arguments and evidence against memory impairment hypotheses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 1–16.
McCloskey, M., &Zaragoza, M. (1985b). Postevent information and memory: Reply to Loftus, Schooler, and Wagenaar.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 381–387.
McGeoch, F. J. (1942).The psychology of human learning. New York Longmans, Green.
Melton, A. W., &Irwin, J. M. (1940). The influence of degree of Interpolated learning on retroactive inhibition and the overt transfer of specific responses.American Journal of Psychology,53, 173–203
Morton, J., Hammersley, R. H., &Bekerian, D. A. (1985) Headed records: A model for memory and its failures.Cognition,20, 1–23.
Pirolli, P. L., &Mitterer, J. O. (1984). The effect of leading questions on prior memory: Evidence for the coexistence of inconsistent traces.Canadian Journal of Psychology,38, 135–141.
Raye, C. L., &Johnson, M. K. (1980). Reality monitoring vs. discriminating between external sources of memories.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,15, 405–408.
Raye, C. L., Johnson, M. K., &Taylor, T. H. (1980). Is there something special about memory for internally generated information?Memory & Cognition,8, 141–148.
Shaughnessy, J. J., &Mand, J. L. (1982). How permanent are memories of real-life events?American Journal of Psychology,95, 51–63.
Tversky, B., &Tuchin, M. (1989). A reconciliation of the evidence on eyewitness testimony: Comments on the loftus-McCloskey & Zaragoza debate.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 86–91.
Underwood, B. J. (1945). The effect of successive interpolations on retroactive and proactive inhibition.Psychological Monographs,59 (Whole No. 273).
Wagenaar, W. A. (1987, November).Evidence for parallel files in memory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Seattle, WA.
Wells, G. L., &Loftus, E. F. (Eds.). (1984).Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Winograd, E. (1968). List differentiation as a function of frequency and retention interval.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,76, 1–18.
Zaragoza, M. S., &Koshmider, J. W., III. (1989). Misled subjects may know more than their performance implies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 246–255.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported In part by National Science Foundation Grant BNS8510633 to Marcia K. Johnson.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lindsay, D.S., Johnson, M.K. The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source. Memory & Cognition 17, 349–358 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198473
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198473