According to this book from @flashflashitsash, Adrien was born on October 13.

ML, according to astruc, is set in 2014-2015.

Adrien is somewhere between 13-15.

October 13, 200 was a Friday.

Thus, Adrien was born on Friday the 13 in October of 2000.

Explains a lot, doesn’t it.

@strangerahne

WAIT A DAMN MINUTE HE IS 20?!

@avengerthewarrior he’s 20 NOW, but during the time the series is set he’s 14-15.

Wait. Marinette can’t have been born September 20th. The show Marinette reveals that her astrological sign is a Leo (first in Animan, then in the French version of Ikari Gozen), which places her birthday between July 23rd and August 22nd.

Actually, I think Marinette says that she thinks it's Leo. She isn't sure, so she may be mistaken.

Rumple deserves to be a father to Gideon.

I’m sitting here in awe of the fact that people are actually defending Belle’s choice to send her child away to keep him from Rumple. Like, didn’t we already go through this issue with Emma, Maleficent and Snowing? Back in season 2, Emma was sad, because although she had reunited with her parents after 28 years, she says no matter what the circumstance was, even if it was to give her, her best chance, it didn’t change the fact that she was alone, and even if she had been cursed, at least she would have had her family. We saw how damaged Emma had become due to this, how hard it was for her to open up to them and others, yet Belle just resigned Gideon to the same fate as Emma, and it speaks of shit writing that Emma was right there and did not bring it up at all. Not to mention the fact that Belle keeps Gideon from his father, similar to how Maleficent had her child taken from her by Snowing, and it was “justified” at the time by the heroes because she was a villain, and would likely corrupt the kid. Yet when she reunites with Lily, revenge is not something on her mind, she simply wanted to be a mother to her. Or hey, how about when Emma initially tried to keep Neal from Henry, and Snow tells Emma that no matter what Neal may have done, he has the right to know his son. And when  Emma tried  to justify it with she “doesn’t want Henry to get hurt”, and that shes simply “trying to protect him”, Snow asks her if she’s sure its just about Henry, and that Emma of all people, should know how it feels to be kept away from a parent! Yet now Belle keeping Rumple from his kid is okay now? Sending him away is okay now? The funny thing is, when it came to Emma and Maleficent, somehow the show emphasizes the pain they went through thanks to the choices of others, whether well intentioned (Snowing by giving Emma up) or downright assumptive (Snowing when it came to Mal). What’s funnier is that even though both of these situations have been essentially combined now with the Rumbelle baby arc, people are on Rumple’s case, saying he doesn’t deserve to know or even see his kid, and defending Belle keeping him away. And for what reason exactly? It’s funny how he apparently doesn’t deserve to know his kid, and he’s going “too far” to try and make sure Belle doesn’t take his child away from him. How the hell one can go “too far” in order to stop someone from kidnapping a child, is beyond me. On top of it, the only “evidence” Belle has to keep Rumple from his child is shaky at best. A guy appears to her in a dream and says to do so. But, how many people have a grudge against Rumple again? Why would Belle so easily trust the word of some man showing up in a dream who didn’t even actually say what Rumple did or how he would be such an awful person that ruins everything? And now that we’ve got Belle sending her kid away to “give him his best chance” the way it happened with Emma, and we’ve got him being taken by fairies, and we’ve learned in the same episode that Rumple’s mom is Black Fairy, I can only guess that she gets her hands on Rumple’s kid and corrupts him. He’s probably even the one under the hood.

Yes, and that’s worse, because maybe Belle’s actions contribute to the very outcome she was trying to prevent. 

Centuries into the future after they stopped working, their carcasses will be exposed in a Museum or Mausoleum.

The Skywalker Droids, two of the greatest War Heroes of Galactic History!

What’s in the Box?

1. A Book of Prophecies that ends with the KH3 ending.

2. A Book of Prophecies that goes beyond the end of KH3.

(or MoM saw two futures. One that ended with Darkness Prevailing and Light Expiring, and the other, where Light prevailed, but its hero vanished.)

According to Ira, the last page is about the Light expiring and Darkness prevailing. Tg events of KH3 befire the change in the Timeline.

According to Pete, Maleficent is looking for the Box, because someone told her the Book of Prophecies was inside.

Now, why would the MoM save a Book of Prophecies in a box that would only be opened after KH3, if the Book's last page is about the events in KH3.

Surely, it has got to be a New Book of Prophecies, for the events after KH3.

Maybe it's a book for a new apprentice of the MoM? Ava is missing afterall, so he might need a replacement. And maybe the Book would be used to test that new apprentice?

The Body Language of Namine/Ava

Decided to make another post regarding the gestures and such that pertain to the theory that these characters are one and the same. The images aren't nearly as good of quality as I decided not to download any videos this time and simply made use of YT.

Nevertheless, you'll see the images below the read more.

I think it just proves that Ava is Kairi's ancestor.

I don't know about you, but I find their voices quite similar too.

cough cough

I don't understand people who say that Sora feels what is in the heart of others.

Has he ever felt Riku's pain before and throughout KH1? No.

He didn't feel Kairi's fear of Riku either.

He only felt Ventus in BBS, because their hearts were connected.

Same with Roxas in KH2, DDD and KH3.

And he only felt Aqua's fear and despair because he was literally in her heart.

None of these instances represents Player's idea of sensing what's in the hearts of others.

Those of us in the SW fandom who make valid criticisms of the merciless moral hypocrisy of Obi-Wan and the other Jedi in regards to those who turn on them: While Anakin, Dooku, and the other fallen Jedi of the prequels were not innocents who deserved no punishment for their crimes against the Jedi Order and Republic at all, the other members of the Jedi Order in which they grew up in really had a lot of nerve in taking it upon themselves to immediately decide to execute them upon finding out they turned on them without asking any questions about why they went dark in the first place, or offering any sort of legal defense trial.

Jedi apologists and Kenobists: You realize that Anakin murdered children, right? What else was Obi-Wan supposed to do after he found out Anakin had killed younglings and participated in the mass murder of the Jedi Order and the Separatists for Sidious? You only expected for Obi-Wan to go easier on Anakin because you want to fuck Hayden Christensen! You hate children!

Those of us who criticize the Jedi and Kenobi: No, we really don’t hate children, and it’s not about wanting to fuck Anakin. It’s about the fact that Obi-Wan and the majority of the adults in Jedi Order of his time were also deeply fucked up in terms of their morality when it came to creating collateral damage, their treatment of children, their treatment of their recruits, their treatment of their enemies, their treatment of the clones, and their treatment of outsiders for their “greater good,” while continuing to claim they were “peacekeepers,” “fighters for democracy,” “revenge is not the Jedi way,” and “fear is the path to the dark side,” in spite of repeatedly breaking those vows throughout the OT and PT movies before Luke came along.

We’re not saying that Padme should have just immediately taken Anakin back, or that Obi Wan the rest of the Jedi should have just completely let him off the hook for committing terrible crimes, and let him continue to keep doing those terrible things. He should have been taken to court. He should have been arrested with proper therapy until he proved he could be trusted and made an effort to make amends. He should have been in a universe that wasn’t so inherently fucked up in terms of its justice and morality.

In real life, he very well would either be facing imprisonment long term or the death penalty as a sentence for his crimes in court.

However, you know who else would be facing serious charges in court of a death penalty or long term imprisonment for multiple instances of brainwashing recruits, child abandonment, abuse, endangerment, and neglect through the recruiting of children as soldiers, assault, oppression of their army, willingly creating collateral damage of innocents, knowingly perpetuating the crimes of a corrupt government head, murder, trying to commit treason against the head of the government, cruel and unusual punishment, and unlawful execution of enemies without reasonable cause for immediate self-defense for their “greater good” in real life, too?

Obi-Wan Kenobi, Qui Gonn Jinn, Yoda, Mace Windu, and the other adult members of the Jedi Order before its collapse.

Jedi apologists and Kenobists: Bu-but, Obi-Wan, Yoda, and the Jedi are the good guys. The Council and Qui Gonn “had” to recruit preschoolers and children to be soldiers for their Order because “attachments to family and friends are dangerous,” and “Anakin was just an emotionally immature and selfish baby who became excessively terrified of abandonment from loved ones, and grew to hate Obi-Wan, Yoda, and the Jedi for no reason.”

Those of us who make valid criticisms and observations of Obi-Wan and the Jedi Order adults in the prequels and OT films:

Tell that to Luke Skywalker who is able to save the day where his predecessors failed because he had a healthy, normal, and safe childhood with two guardians who raised him to be a good person by just being kind, open-minded, self-aware, and self-confident in his better instincts rather than a good weapon who completely sacrificed himself “for the greater good” of one of those two fucked up space soldier cults.

Throughout the OT movies, Obi-Wan and Yoda literally never atone or express any remorse to Luke Skywalker for deliberately deceiving him, endangering, and manipulating him for their own ends of killing Darth Vader “for the greater good.” Yeah, they say it is all for the “greater good,” and we’re not arguing that a lot of people throughout the galaxy had good reason to hate Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader and want him killed for the purposes of justice and safety after all the crimes he committed against many of them over the past two decades, regardless of the mitigating circumstances of heavily compromised agency he was dealing with his whole life that made healthy support extremely limited to nonexistent and escape extremely unsafe, including Luke. We know he’s not a wholly innocent woobie who Luke was obligated to save. We know people had reason to hate him.

However, Obi-Wan and Yoda repeatedly tell Luke to kill just Darth Vader/Anakin Skywalker, their former student, who they claim to have helped fuck up and drive away in the first place around two decades earlier. They never tell Luke to destroy the Emperor, too. They’re just focused on using him to clean up a mess they helped create with his father and the galaxy at large. No, not intentionally, and sure, they can’t force Anakin to come back to the light, nor are they obligated to do so if he refuses them. Still, the fact that they are using an innocent to try to absolve themselves is wrong. The fact that they get away with defending themselves for it when others repeatedly call them out on their cowardice and shitty treatment of others is even worse.

Anakin is the only one of his surviving predecessors in the OT movies who gets consistently framed as wrong for using that “greater good” line to compartmentalize his guilt and excuse his crimes in regards to Luke and the galaxy at large for Sidious’s and/or his own ends because they are easier to continue perpetuating than doing the right thing by taking personal accountability and ultimately atones for it by selflessly sacrificing his life to save Luke and letting go of decades of anger, guilt, fear, hatred, and self-loathing borne from a life of betrayal and suffering, not all of which was his fault.

Some people seem to feel the need to excuse the misconduct of the Jedi as a reaction to genocide apologia. They can’t see nuance.

“The Jedi were severely flawed” and “The Jedi didn’t deserve to be slaughtered” are two truths that can and should coexist. The Jedi were so focused on the Force and the “greater good” that they often refused to consider the concrete good of the people around them. They were agents of the Republic, which has a history of privileging large corporations and Core powers and ignoring the suffering of those on the Rim. Nonetheless, they did do good, and more importantly they are sentient beings who deserved to live. 

Probably a result of the education of "if you are a victim of Genocide, then you have a right to do everything you desire"

Which is what has been drilled into the heads of many people with Israel.

Their crimes since 1948 has been washed away because "Jews are victims"

Even though Israelis are not even trully Jews but Zionists.

A tactic they use today to excuse their own Genocide of the Palestinians. Except that it thankfully doesn't work anymore.

So the clones didn’t kill Barriss in custody because they say she’s not a Jedi anymore, but they attacked Ahsoka who also left the Order and Rex ordered Maul’s execution even though he was also in custody and a Sith? Star Wars staying inconsistent 😘

Palpatine most likely had a way to update the chips to eliminate different targets.

For starters the chips were created before he met Anakin, therefore he had to add an exception for Anakin, as the Clones will not all automatically know that he ceased to be a Jedi.

This is why Tup never reacted to Anakin under his malfunctioning Chip's influence, but yet locked on the other two Jedi the moment he saw them.

The moment he found out Maul was alive, Palpatine added him as a target. The moment Ahsoka left, he added her as a target.

I imagine he also did the same for Ventress, also we haven't seen her fight any mind-controlled Clone since the war ended.

Barriss completely betrayed the Jedi and was already at his mercy, she was more valuable as a potential Inquisitor, and was therefore not added to the Target List.

It's actually very logical. It's also very consistent with Palpatine's tendency to have contingency plans.

are we gonna talk about how Anakin is with the Vader lightsaber? no? for sure we won't? okay........

It is not Vader's Lightsaber.

Vader's Lightsaber is not Silver in the middle.

This is a new Lightsaber.

Anakin's Lightsabers :

1. As a young Padawan

2. As a Senior Padawan (AOTC)

3. As a Jedi Knight (TCW & ROTS)

Vader's Lightsaber :

Anakin/Vader's Lightsaber in Ahsoka :

This one is All Black with Silver in the middle. I am ready to bet that this is a completely new Lightsaber that they made for themselves. Anakin and Vader are together and at Peace with one another.

New them, new Lightsaber.

Crowley is Lucifer

(Ok I know some of you don't believe this theory but I highly suggest you give this a quick read anyway. I tried to make it short and easy and I'll be going chronologically, from s1 all through s2)

- First, let's get this out of the way, Lucifer and Satan aren't neccesarilly the same person. Even in the show the devil that appeared in s1 has only ever been reffered to as Satan, not even once as Lucifer.

- In the bible Lucifer was the one to tempt Eve with the apple, and who do we know that does that in the show. Crowley is literally THE snake from Eden.

- An obvious one perhaps, but the red hair is also a giveaway

- In the bible Jesus was tempted by the devil for 30 days, in the show Crowley says "I showed him all the kingdoms of the world", so that's another role Lucifer has that Crowley had in the show

- It's well known (even mentioned in the Sandman) that Lucifer was the most beautiful of all angels, and our demon is played by no other than David Tennant

Now on to season 2 because there's a LOT to unpack here

- He litterally started the engine of the universe which was one of Lucifers roles

- He's the first to say "let there be light", which is pretty fucking huge since that is Gods line

- "I worked closely with upstairs on it" even in the first scene they're telling us Crowley is an angel of very very high rank

- He fell for asking questions, which is litterally what Lucifer fell for, for questioning God. This in and of itself should be a pretty big indicator. "I only ever asked questions"

- Shax: "a miracle of enourmous power only the mightiest of archangels can perform"

Crowley: "How do you know I didn't do it"

And Shax just... doesn't counter that. She looks even skeptical, as if it COULD be a possibility, unlike Uriel who says to Aziraphale don't excpect us to believe you did it. Shax litterally doesn't shut the option down which confirms Crowley has the power not only of an archangel but of the mightiest kind

- In the bookshop with Gabriel/Jim he says "I don't remember. It [gravity] seemed like a good idea when we were all talking about it"

- "You're welcome to come in, you might even spot an archangel" don't tell me this was Crowley just egging Shax on and not being sneaky

- The fact that he could sense the demons coming. "Somethings wrong""It's coming in waves", when Aziraphale couldn't. It could be a demon thing but we saw Sandalphon, an archangel of lower rank, in the first season mention "something smells evil" so obviously angels can sense demons too, they just have to be powerful enough. And keep in mind Sandalphon was already in the book shop for quite some time, Crowley sensed them even before they had arrived (he also sensed the hell hound who was some fucking miles away)

- The.fucking.folder. "You have to be a throne or dominion above" and this dude opens these clasified documents like it's nothing. If this isn't an indicator of his high position as an angel I don't know what is.

- He's worked with Saraqael, another very high ranking angel

- "I'm the only first order archangel in the room"... and the camera imediately pans to Crowley, and for anyone who's read the book and watched the show you know that rarely anything is coincidental

- When the Metatron says they can't lose another prince of heaven. This... this fucking line. So it's relatively well known that Gabriel and Lucifer are brothers, and if Gabriel is one of the princes of heaven I wonder who the other one could be. "Two princes of heaven". And the Metatrons words were very careful, he doesn't say lost as in heaven can't find him, he says it in the context that they won't be sending Gabriel to hell since they won't lose another prince to downstairs

- In the bookshop when no one can identify the Metatron he turns to Crowley who imediately recognises him. Now you have this dude, who's literally on top of the angel hierarchy and is responsible for running heaven and the connection to God themself, surrounded by archangels and a principality you spoke to face to face with just a few years ago and... none of them can tell who you are, the only one who does is the literal demon. That tells us that Crowley has not only seen him in this form, but has probably worked with the Metaron himself personally. "Always asking damn fool questions", 10 million angels and he remembers what this one particular angel was like 6000 years ago

- Crowley is also very reluctant to reveal his identity as an angel. Now if he were just an ordinary angel of no real significance he wouldn't have a problem revealing his name, but... if his name was one that's the literal representation of all evil in this world, then it is understandable he keeps it a secret, in fear he might scare Aziraphale away

- And I wanted to leave the best for last. So you remember in the book when Crowley has to sign his name to start Armaggedon, and Hastur tells him "no, your real name" after which he reluctantly writes it. Now in the book we never see him write anything, but in the show we see him write a sygil, something that looks very mich like an L. An L... A FUCKING L. And now I wonder how this theory didn't come up sooner.

(Also he can fucking stop time, like dafuq)

Edit:

- "Oh looky here it's Lucifer and the guys" we all thought he was talking about someone else, he's just refferencing things other angels have said about HIM. FUCK

- I keep seing people saying Crowleys memories were wiped because he couldn't remember Saraqael and Furfur. But I think people forget, demons lie. He's lying to make them think he's not that angel they worked with, that he's not Lucifer. (In season 1 we hear him a few times refferencing his life as an angel, so he does remember most of it)

- Also saying if the Raphael theory were true then as showrunners they would have mentioned him somewhere for those not that familiar with the bible (or don't read much fanfiction). The refferences for Crowleys past are so so vague that it would be too sudden and confusing if he were Raphael. But there is one name that everyone is familiar with, no matter who you are how old you are or where you're from, a name that needs no introduction.

Edit 2:

- Back to him being the most beautiful angel, I don't think it was ever quite explained how every single demon when they're in hell looks... awful, but Crowley doesn't. Beelzebub has the spores all over their face, Hastur the maggots and the sh-, Dagon the scales etc. But Crowley doesn't, not even when he's in hell, he's always just so, well, pretty.

- I saw a few people asking about how Lucifer started the rebellion and Crowley wouldn't do that. I think it's the same Crowley who wouldn't get stuck in traffic after creating the M25, or the same Crowley that wanted to call Aziraphale after bringing down the entire London network, "you told them you invented the spanish inquisition, and started the second world war""so the humans beat me to it that's not my fault", "so all this is your demonic work?""no, the humans thought it up themselves nothing to do with me"

- Also I think Satan's in charge of hell not Crowley the same way the Metatron's in charge of heaven and not Gabriel (and who can very easily demote angels if he so wishes)

Edit 3:

- like some of you pointed out Lucifer is also known/means Light-bringer. And Crowley was the first to say "let there be light."

- The file he opens with Muriel is Gabriels file, a class A archangel, so if he knows the password to that it means that either he's on the same level as Gabriel, or above him.

To everyone who dismiss this Lucifer theory because of Neil Gaiman

I just want to point out that :

Writers lie all the time.

If Crowley truly is Lucifer, Neil wouldn't say yes, that would ruin the whole reveal in season 3.

I have some experience with writers lying in order to keep the whole surprise for future seasons, therefore I don't see why Gaiman wouldn't do the same.

Which is why I never believe anything they say.

If a theory makes perfect sense, then I will believe it, until the canon proves me wrong.

And with this particular theory, I came up with it all on my own and I am glad that I am not the only one who did.

Also look at this Lucifer painting by Alexander Cabanel, and compare it to Angel Crowley in Good Omens.

Curly Ginger Hair, that's all I'm saying.

Quite the coincidence, on top of everthing else that we already see in Season 2.