Atheistic existentialism

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gregbard (talk | contribs) at 04:05, 26 April 2009 (phil cats). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Atheist Existentialism is a kind of existentialism which became evident after the publication, in 1943, of The Being and the Nothingness of Jean-Paul Sartre. But also previously Sartre whrote works in the spirit of atheistic existentialism, i.e. the novel Nausea (1938) and the short stories in his 1939 collection The Wall. After Sartre in such spirit are the works of Albert Camus and also Simone de Beauvoir can be considered a writer in the spirit of atheist existentialism.

The novel The Nausea is in some ways a manifesto of atheism in existentialism and is an important books in this way. Sartre deal with a dejected researcher (Antoine Roquentin) in a anonymous french town, where Roquentin becomes conscious of the fact that the vegetable nature as a root tree, and obviously every inanimate objects, are indifferent towards him and his tormented existence. Besides they show to be totally extraneous to any human meaning, while no human conscience can see something significant in them.

In Camus we have a sort of dualisms between happiness and sadness, life and death, and the human condition is fleeting in it. In Le Mythe de Sisyphe (''The Myth of Sisyphus (1942) such dualism becomes paradoxal, because the man value greatly our existence while we know our endeavours be meaningless. So he becomes in a contradicting absurd, because if he asserts: I can accept periods of unhappiness, because I know I will also experience happiness to come, then assert cannot live with the paradox: I think my life is of great importance, but I also think it is meaningless. Therefore Camus spoke of experience the Absurd, but together of a some strange acceptation of it.

Principles

The term 'atheistic existentialism' refers to an esistenzialistic way excluding any transcendental, metaphysical or religious factor from its horizon. Therefore it shares with the religious existentialism (typical in Kierkegaard), the element of anguish and defeat for human finitude, together its limitations. Its particular is all absence of any reference to the transcendence, because its exclusive recognition of immanence.. The atheistic existentialism is consequently an independent type of existentialism, without any relation with the religious one (in Kierkegaard) and only a few (through of Husserl Phenomenology) with the metaphysical one (Heidegger), but instead quite cole to Philosophical atheism.

The atheistic existentialism shares with the religious one the torment and the anguish, but while this one is able to have an optimistic item in communion with God, or at least with reference to him, the atheist has nothing to rely, being alone in front of his existential malaise. But we must also see how this malaise is real and not just theoretical, because, for example Jean-Paul Sartre, was certainly a great existentialist philosopher, but in his life does not seem to have been so impressed by esistentialistic anguish, while that was certainly in Albert Camus.

See also