Declaration of Arbroath: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
TDC79 (talk | contribs)
TDC79 (talk | contribs)
Line 19:
By 1314 only [[Edinburgh]], [[Berwick-upon-Tweed]], [[Roxburgh]], and [[Stirling]] remained in English hands. In June 1314 the [[Battle of Bannockburn]] had secured Robert Bruce's position as King of Scots; Stirling, the [[Central Belt]], and much of [[Lothian]] came under Robert's control while the defeated [[Edward II of England|Edward II]]'s power on escaping to England via Berwick weakened under the sway of his cousin [[Henry, 3rd Earl of Lancaster|Henry, Earl of Lancaster]].<ref name=":3" /> King Robert was thus able to consolidate his power, and sent his brother [[Edward Bruce]] to claim the [[Kingdom of Ireland]] in 1315 with an army landed in [[Ulster]] the previous year with the help of Gaelic lords from the [[Lord of the Isles|Isles]].<ref name=":3" /> Edward Bruce died in 1318 without achieving success, but the Scots campaigns in Ireland and in northern England were intended to press for the recognition of Robert's crown by King Edward.<ref name=":3" /> At the same time, it undermined the [[House of Plantagenet|House of Plantagenet's]] claims to overlordship of the British Isles and halted the Plantagenets' effort to absorb Scotland as had been done in Ireland and Wales. Thus were the Scots nobles confident in their letters to Pope John of the distinct and independent nature of Scotland's kingdom; the ''Declaration of Arbroath'' was one such. According to historian [[David Crouch (historian)|David Crouch]], "The two nations were mutually hostile kingdoms and peoples, and the ancient idea of Britain as an informal empire of peoples under the English king's presidency was entirely dead."<ref name=":4" />
 
The text describes the ancient history of Scotland and especiallyin particular the ''[[Scoti]]'', the [[Gaels|Gaelic]] forbears of the [[Scottish people|Scots]], who the ''Declaration'' aserts originated in [[Scythia|''Scythia Major'']] and migrated via Spain to [[Great Britain]] dating their migration to "1,200 years from the [[Crossing the Red Sea|Israelite people's crossing of the Red Sea]]".{{efn|{{Lang-la|Undeque veniens post mille et ducentos annos a transitu populi israelitici per mare rubrum|links=no}} }} The ''Declaration'' describes how the Scots had "thrown out the [[Celtic Britons|Britons]] and completely destroyed the [[Picts]]",{{efn|{{Lang-la|expulsis primo Britonibus et Pictis omnino deletis|links=no}} }} resisted the invasions of "the Norse, the Danes and the English",{{efn|{{Lang-la|licet per Norwagienses, Dacos et Anglicos sepius inpugnata fuerit|links=no}} }} and "held itself ever since, free from all slavery".{{efn|{{Lang-la|ipsaque ab omni seruitute liberas, semper tenuit|links=no}} }} It then claims that in the Kingdom of Scotland, "one hundred and thirteen kings have reigned of their own [[Royal descent|Blood Royal]], without interruption by foreigners".{{efn|{{Lang-la|In quorum Regno Centum et Tredescim Reges de ipsorum Regali prosapia, nullo alienigena interueniente, Regnauerunt|links=no}} }} The text compares Robert Bruce with the Biblical warriors [[Judah Maccabee]] and [[Joshua]].{{efn|{{Lang-la|quasi alter Machabeus aut Josue|links=no}} }}
 
The ''Declaration'' made a number of points: that Edward I of England had unjustly attacked Scotland and perpetrated atrocities; that Robert the Bruce had delivered the Scottish nation from this peril; and, most controversially, that the independence of Scotland was the prerogative of the Scottish people, rather than the King of Scots.