Ontology: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
replace/remove low-quality source per discussion at WP:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#IGI_Global; adjust example to fit new source
simplify language per GA suggestion
Line 3:
{{About|the philosophical study of being|the information science concept|Ontology (information science)}}
 
'''Ontology''' is the philosophical study of being. As one of the most fundamental concepts, being encompasses all of [[reality]] and every [[entity]] within it. To articulate the basic structure of being, ontology examines what all entitiesthings have in common. andIt also investigates how they arecan dividedbe grouped into fundamentalbasic classestypes, knownsuch as the [[Theory of categories|categories]]. An influential distinction is betweenof [[particular]]s and [[Universal (metaphysics)|universaluniversals]] entities. Particulars are unique, non-repeatable entities, like the person [[Socrates]]. Universals are general, repeatable entities, like the color ''green''. Another contrast is between [[Abstract and concrete|concrete]] objects existing in space and time, like a tree, and abstract objects existing outside space and time, like the number 7. Systems of categories aim to provide a comprehensive inventory of reality, employing categories such as [[Substance theory|substance]], [[Property (philosophy)|property]], [[Relation (philosophy)|relation]], [[State of affairs (philosophy)|state of affairs]], and [[Event (philosophy)|event]].
 
Ontologists disagree about which entities exist on the most basic level. [[Platonic realism]] asserts that universals have objective existence. [[Conceptualism]] says that universals only exist in the mind while [[nominalism]] denies their existence. There are similar disputes about [[mathematical object]]s, [[unobservable]] objects assumed by scientific theories, and [[Ethics#Realism, relativism, and nihilism|moral facts]]. [[Materialism]] says that, fundamentally, there is only [[matter]] while [[Mind–body dualism|dualism]] asserts that [[mind]] and matter are independent principles. According to some ontologists, there are no objective answers to ontological questions but only perspectives shaped by different linguistic practices.