Radar astronomy

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sepidnoor (talk | contribs) at 16:25, 4 December 2021. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Radar astronomy is a technique of observing nearby astronomical objects by reflecting microwaves off target objects and analyzing the reflections. This research has been conducted for six decades. Radar astronomy differs from radio astronomy in that the latter is a passive observation and the former an active one. Radar systems have been used for a wide range of solar system studies. The radar transmission may either be pulsed or continuous.

The strength of the radar return signal is proportional to the inverse fourth-power of the distance. Upgraded facilities, increased transceiver power, and improved apparatus have increased observational opportunities.

Radar techniques provide information unavailable by other means, such as testing general relativity by observing Mercury[1] and providing a refined value for the astronomical unit.[2] Radar images provide information about the shapes and surface properties of solid bodies, which cannot be obtained by other ground-based techniques.

Millstone Hill Radar in 1958
Early planetary radar Pluton, USSR, 1960

Relying upon high-powered terrestrial radars (of up to one MW[3]), radar astronomy is able to provide extremely accurate astrometric information on the structure, composition and movement of Solar System objects.[4] This aids in forming long-term predictions of asteroid-Earth impacts, as illustrated by the object 99942 Apophis. In particular, optical observations measure where an object appears in the sky, but cannot measure the distance with great accuracy (relying on parallax becomes more difficult when objects are small or poorly illuminated). Radar, on the other hand, directly measures the distance to the object (and how fast it is changing). The combination of optical and radar observations normally allows the prediction of orbits at least decades, and sometimes centuries, into the future.

In August 2020 the Arecibo Observatory (Arecibo Planetary Radar) suffered a structural cable failure, leading to the collapse of the main telescope in December of that year.[5]

There is one remaining radar astronomy facility in regular use, the Goldstone Solar System Radar.

Advantages

  • Control of attributes of the signal [i.e., the waveform's time/frequency modulation and polarization]
  • Resolve objects spatially.
  • Delay-Doppler measurement precision.
  • Optically opaque penetration.
  • Sensitive to high concentrations of metal or ice.

Disadvantages

The maximum range of astronomy by radar is very limited, and is confined to the Solar System. This is because the signal strength drops off very steeply with distance to the target, the small fraction of incident flux that is reflected by the target, and the limited strength of transmitters.[6] The distance to which the radar can detect an object is proportional to the square root of the object's size, due to the one-over-distance-to-the-fourth dependence of echo strength. Radar could detect something ~1 km across a large fraction of an AU away, but at 8-10 AU, the distance to Saturn, we need targets at least hundreds of kilometers wide. It is also necessary to have a relatively good ephemeris of the target before observing it.

History

The Moon is comparatively close and was detected by radar soon after the invention of the technique in 1946.[7][8] Measurements included surface roughness and later mapping of shadowed regions near the poles.

The next easiest target is Venus. This was a target of great scientific value, since it could provide an unambiguous way to measure the size of the astronomical unit, which was needed for the nascent field of interplanetary spacecraft. In addition such technical prowess had great public relations value, and was an excellent demonstration to funding agencies. So there was considerable pressure to squeeze a scientific result from weak and noisy data, which was accomplished by heavy post-processing of the results, utilizing the expected value to tell where to look. This led to early claims (from Lincoln Laboratory, Jodrell Bank, and Vladimir A. Kotelnikov of the USSR) which are now known to be incorrect. All of these agreed with each other and the conventional value of AU at the time, 149467000 km.[2]

The first unambiguous detection of Venus was made by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory on 10 March 1961. JPL established contact with the planet Venus using a planetary radar system from 10 March to 10 May 1961. Using both velocity and range data, a new value of 149598500±500 km was determined for the astronomical unit.[9][10] Once the correct value was known, other groups found echos in their archived data that agreed with these results.[2]

The following is a list of planetary bodies that have been observed by this means:

 
Computer model of asteroid (216) Kleopatra, based on radar analysis.
 
Radar images and computer model of asteroid 1999 JM8

Asteroids and comets

Radar provides the ability to study the shape, size and spin state of asteroids and comets from the ground. Radar imaging has produced images with up to 7.5-meter resolution. With sufficient data, the size, shape, spin and radar albedo of the target asteroids can be extracted.

Only 19 comets have been studied by radar,[11] including 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann. There have been radar observations of 612 Near-Earth asteroids and 138 Main belt asteroids as of early 2016.[11] By 2018, this had grown to 138 Main-Belt Asteroids, 789 Near-Earth Asteroids, also at that time 20 comets had been observed.[11]

Many bodies are observed during their close flyby of Earth.

While operational the Arecibo Observatory provided information about Earth threatening comet and asteroid impacts, allowing impact and near miss predictions decades into the future such as those for Apophis and other bodies.[5] Being smaller the Goldstone Solar System Radar is less sensitive and unable to provide the same predictive capacity.

Telescopes

See also

References

  1. ^ Anderson, John D.; Slade, Martin A.; Jurgens, Raymond F.; Lau, Eunice L.; Newhall, X. X.; Myles, E. (July 1990). Radar and spacecraft ranging to Mercury between 1966 and 1988. IAU, Asian-Pacific Regional Astronomy Meeting, 5th, Proceedings (Held July 16–20, 1990). Vol. 9. Sydney, Australia: Astronomical Society of Australia. p. 324. Bibcode:1991PASAu...9..324A. ISSN 0066-9997.
  2. ^ a b c Butrica, Andrew J. (1996). "Chapter 2: Fickle Venus". NASA SP-4218: To See the Unseen - A History of Planetary Radar Astronomy. NASA. Archived from the original on 2007-08-23. Retrieved 2008-05-15.
  3. ^ "Arecibo Radar Status". Retrieved 22 December 2012.
  4. ^ Ostro, Steven (1997). "Asteroid Radar Research Page". JPL. Retrieved 22 December 2012.
  5. ^ a b "Giant Arecibo radio telescope collapses in Puerto Rico". www.theguardian.com. Retrieved March 5, 2021.
  6. ^ Hey, J. S. (1973). The Evolution of Radio Astronomy. Histories of Science Series. Vol. 1. Paul Elek (Scientific Books).
  7. ^ Mofensen, Jack (April 1946). "Radar echoes from the moon". Electronics. 19: 92–98. Archived from the original on 2008-10-29.
  8. ^ Bay, Zoltán (January 1947). "Reflection of microwaves from the moon" (PDF). Hungarica Acta Physica. 1 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1007/BF03161123.
  9. ^ Malling, L. R.; Golomb, S. W. (October 1961). "Radar Measurements of the Planet Venus" (PDF). Journal of the British Institution of Radio Engineers. 22 (4): 297–300. doi:10.1049/jbire.1961.0121.
  10. ^ Muhleman, Duane O.; Holdridge, D. B.; Block, N. (May 1962). "The astronomical unit determined by radar reflections from Venus". Astronomical Journal. 67 (4): 191–203. Bibcode:1962AJ.....67..191M. doi:10.1086/108693. Using further analysis, this gives a refined figure of 149598845±250 km.
  11. ^ a b c "Radar-Detected Asteroids and Comets". NASA/JPL Asteroid Radar Research. Retrieved 2016-04-25.
  12. ^ Latifiyan, Pouya (April 2021). "Space Telecommunications, How?". Take Off. 1. Tehran: Civil Aviation Technology College: 15, 16.