Content deleted Content added
!NewLondon31 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 69:
Historians have noted the stridency with which Townsend put forward his pro-Japanese views before World War II.<ref name="mintz"/> Justus Doenecke, for instance, described Townsend as "The most adamant and extreme of the voices in America defending Japanese policy."<ref>Doenecke (1987), 346.</ref> Judith Papachristou concurs that "Few anti-imperialists were as extreme as isolationist Ralph Townsend",<ref>Judith Papachristou, "An Exercise in Anti-Imperialism: The Thirties," ''American Studies'', Spring 1974, 65.</ref> though Townsend himself rejected the "isolationist" label during his life,<ref>Ralph Townsend, ''There Is No Halfway Neutrality'' (San Francisco: self-published, 1938), 31.</ref> and instead called himself a "realist" and "Pro-Peace".<ref>Townsend (1936), 2.</ref><ref>Ralph Townsend, "Sedition ... Then and Now," ''American Mercury'', Summer 1968, 45.</ref>
Townsend is still held in esteem by many members of the extreme right in the United States, and recently in Japan as well. After his death his widow Janet turned over his papers to Larry Humphreys, an Oklahoma multimillionaire and supporter of right-wing [[
The opinion of recent scholars on the quality of his writing have been mixed. Limin Chu, who analyzed his articles on China for the ''[[Overland Monthly|Overland Monthly and Out West Magazine]]'', considered some of the claims as "either incredibly gullible or deliberately vicious",<ref>Limin Chu, "China and Sino-US Relations, 1900–1930: The Overland Monthly," ''Sino-American Relations: An International Quarterly'', Summer 2001, 78.</ref> while historian Justus Doenecke described his pamphlets as "crudely written".<ref>Doenecke (1987), 73.</ref> In contrast, Peter O'Connor, professor at [[Musashino University]], found the same pamphlets "well-argued and researched."<ref>O'Connor, 35.</ref>
|