Content deleted Content added
→Lead length: Reply |
→Lead length: Reply |
||
Line 93:
::::::In terms of the NIH page you linked to, I'm more than happy to include this as a source but I think it needs to be paired with more descriptive, scientific resources that complement that over-simplified FAQ-style page. It also doesn't distinguish between the different types of diabetes, mention any pharmacological management strategies, and the self-management recommendations are very clearly geared towards T2DM. <span style="background-color: #CEF0FD; padding: 2px 4px; border-radius: 6px;">[[User:ItsPugle|'''Tim''']]</span> ([[User_talk:ItsPugle|Talk]]) 09:40, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
:::::::I have nothing further on this discussion, and await input from other editors. It may be useful for you to post a discussion at [[WT:MED]]. [[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 17:15, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
::::::::No worries. I'm not going to add this to [[WT:MED]] myself as I still don't see any specific concerns that hold I think merit and are worth broader discussion. If you want to search for wider discussion though, I'm happy to summarise and share my thoughts there so we can work towards a palatable outcome :) If no one adds anything here and you have no further comments, or you decide not to 'escalate' to [[WT:MED]], I'll likely start gradually reinstating parts of my original revision with your commentary in-mind and a better copyedit to fix the structural language mistakes. As always, if you have specific concerns with the content, feel free to add your own revision to address them and we can discuss as needed. <span style="background-color: #CEF0FD; padding: 2px 4px; border-radius: 6px;">[[User:ItsPugle|'''Tim''']]</span> ([[User_talk:ItsPugle|Talk]]) 07:15, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
| |||