Content deleted Content added
Skllagyook (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 76:
::Therefore (or without there) addition of paper L is valid.[[Special:Contributions/99.90.196.227|99.90.196.227]] ([[User talk:99.90.196.227|talk]]) 00:46, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
==differ from CM, Omo or itself==
:::{{ping|User:99.90.196.227}}:I'm sorry but this does not make sense at all and I do not understand what you are trying to express. It is understood and generally accepted that some Oceanian groups (like Papuans and Melanesians) have a small amount of Denisovan ancestry (about 3-6%), but, as I have tried to explain, that has nothing to do with the topic of this article — which is Herto man — (and, in addition, to assume or speculate in any article that the cranial morphology of Oceanians has anything to do with their very small amounts of Denisovan ancestry, if such a hypothesis has not been proposed by any scientific research/reliable source which one can cite, is indeed [[WP:OR]]/original research). But, again (more to the point), Denisovans were a Eurasian hominin (who lived in parts of Asia and possibly parts of Oceania and later bred with Homo sapiens when H. sapiens arrived there) and this Denisovans had nothing to do with Herto man — who was an early type of Homo sapiens who lived in Africa and is considered a likely ancestor (and/or close relative) of all modern humans/H. sapiens groups, not only those in Oceania — , so I'm afraid I do not see the relevance of any of what you have written to this page. [[User:Skllagyook|Skllagyook]] ([[User talk:Skllagyook|talk]]) 01:18, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
::::If you "I do not understand what you are trying to express" do you comment on my text or our your misunderstanding. Maybe i move your as flooding & not on subject? [[Special:Contributions/99.90.196.227|99.90.196.227]] ([[User talk:99.90.196.227|talk]]) 01:29, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Line 82 ⟶ 84:
:::::{{ping|User:99.90.196.227}}: Denisovans have nothing to do with Herto man. They are not relevant to this article. [[User:Skllagyook|Skllagyook]] ([[User talk:Skllagyook|talk]]) 01:32, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
::::::{{ping|User:99.90.196.227}}: I undid your edit because you (for some reason) had edited the section to say "Omo" when the sources/citations and context (and most of the article itself) were talking about Herto, not Omo. [[User:Skllagyook|Skllagyook]] ([[User talk:Skllagyook|talk]]) 01:49, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
:::::::that interesting looking trough history it was first that differ from ''Homo cro-magnon'' later that from ''Homo omo'' and you did that it differ from itself. Isn't true that Herto is logically synonymous for Idalu ? [[Special:Contributions/99.90.196.227|99.90.196.227]] ([[User talk:99.90.196.227|talk]]) 02:09, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
| |||