Content deleted Content added
Prunesqualer (talk | contribs) |
Prunesqualer (talk | contribs) →A note on reversions of my edits by SPECIFICO: new section |
||
Line 1,733:
A good question.- many of the reports I’ve seen about these “assurances” say that “The U.S.” or “the U.S. Government” offer them. I guess it works like other international negotiations eg trade agreements or peace treaties: all the various arms of the state - presidency, congress, judiciary etc - are treated as a single national entity for the purpose of negotiation. So I suppose these guarantees are as good as other international agreements – however, as pointed to in the article the U.S. have, in this instance, given themselves get out clauses which some experts say render the “assurances” worthless [[User:Prunesqualer|<font face="Times" color="105570">Prunesqualor</font>]] [[User talk:Prunesqualer|<font face="times" color="FF7070">billets_doux</font>]] 22:59, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
== A note on reversions of my edits by [[User:SPECIFICO|SPECIFICO]] ==
[[User:SPECIFICO|SPECIFICO]] has made six edits on the main page in the past month. Of those six, five have been direct or manual reversions of my edits (and even the sixth was an edit to a sentence I had recently worked on). The track record before that is not good either. This is harassment and needs to stop. [[User:Prunesqualer|<font face="Times" color="105570">Prunesqualor</font>]] [[User talk:Prunesqualer|<font face="times" color="FF7070">billets_doux</font>]] 11:17, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
| |||