Revision as of 09:16, 22 November 2021 edit Prunesqualer (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 2,853 edits →Baum, Gussin and Podesta speculations ← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:19, 22 November 2021 edit undo Prunesqualer (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 2,853 edits m →Baum, Gussin and Podesta speculations Next edit →
Line 1,896: :“...unearthed communications between Guccifer 2.0, WikiLeaks and the Trump campaign, in which they coordinated the release of the material” :“...WikiLeaks may have released more emails whenever Clinton's lead expanded in the polls...” There is much other material dwelling on Assange’s dislike of Clinton. Just how many times do we need to say, in one convoluted/speculative form or another that: Wikileaks/Assange disliked Clinton and published the information they were given accordingly? Name me one significant Western news publisher which hasn’t taken sides in a US election (publishing material accordingly)? Why on earth are we going on and on about this publisher’s unexceptional act of taking sides. Please note I am not asking for the removal of '''all''' this material – just some ~~sene~~sense of perspective – particularly as there are numerous other wiki pages which already deal with these issues - we don’t need this ludicrous overkill. [[User:Prunesqualer\|<font face="Times" color="105570">Prunesqualor</font>]] [[User talk:Prunesqualer\|<font face="times" color="FF7070">billets_doux</font>]] 09:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Julian Assange: Difference between revisions