Talk:Moscopole: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 5 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 5 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Albania}}, {{WikiProject Greece}}, {{WikiProject Romania}}, {{WikiProject Archaeology}}, {{WikiProject Ghost towns}}.
 
(28 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Albaniabanner shell|class=C|importance1=mid}}
{{WikiProject Archaeology|class=cAlbania|importance=lowmid}}
{{WikiProject Ghost towns|class=CGreece|importance=Low}}mid}}
{{WikiProject Romania|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Archaeology|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Ghost towns|importance=low}}
}}
 
== Albanians in Voskopoja? ==
Line 190 ⟶ 194:
[[http://books.google.com/books?id=2xYzAAAAIAAJ&q=moschopolis%2Bmetropolis&dq=moschopolis%2Bmetropolis&hl=el&ei=JpozTMKiEoGlsQbZpqTOAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CEgQ6AEwBw]]
And of course a 60,000 large city in the 18th century: and [http://www.google.com/search?hl=el&tbo=1&tbs=bks%3A1&q=%22a+population+of+60000+and+was+the+second+largest%2C+most+important+city+on+the+Balkan+Peninsula+after+Constantinople%22&cts=1278450663351&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai= second largest] city in the Balkans that time "was" a metropolis.[[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 21:08, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
:The 60k is the true Metropolitan Legend. The city had 25-30k inhabitants [http://www.google.com/search?hl=el&tbo=1&tbs=bks%3A1&q=voskopoje+banore&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai= See Gjurmime Albanologjike] (which says that Athens and Belgrade at that time had 20k, so it's Ok I guess. --<sub><span style="border:1.5px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sulmues#top|<fontspan style = "color:white;background:navy;">'''Sulmues'''</fontspan>]]</span></sub><sup><small>[[User_talk:Sulmues|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;"> Let's talk </fontspan>]]</small></sup> 20:31, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 
::Even with 20,000, it was a huge urban center of that time. Only a few Balkan cities were that large, since we are talking about 17th century pre Industrial revolution era. By the way since we have plenty of English speaking sources, non-english sources (and especially stalinist ones) as per policy are not preferred.[[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 20:50, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Line 199 ⟶ 203:
Moreover, the term Metropolis, is also related to the Aromanian diaspora, which originated from Moscopole (the term has the same meaning of the ancient Greek metropolis here).[[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 21:11, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 
:What's the meaning of the ancient Greek metropolis Alexi? --<sub><span style="border:1.5px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sulmues#top|<fontspan style = "color:white;background:navy;">'''Sulmues'''</fontspan>]]</span></sub><sup><small>[[User_talk:Sulmues|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;"> Let's talk </fontspan>]]</small></sup> 15:42, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 
::Presumably this refers to Moscopole as the "mother city" of the Aromanian diaspora, on the analogy of ancient Greek colonies. But as far as I know, Moscopole did not send out colonies. And anyway, using the word 'metropolis' to describe Moscopole as a center of emigration makes the article less, not more, clear. Perhaps some clearer formulation can be found? --[[User:Macrakis|Macrakis]] ([[User talk:Macrakis|talk]]) 16:57, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 
Referenced Elsie's review of Peyfuss: It's ''said'' to have contained 20-50k.--<sub><span style="border:1.5px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sulmues#top|<fontspan style = "color:white;background:navy;">'''Sulmues'''</fontspan>]]</span></sub><sup><small>[[User_talk:Sulmues|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;"> Let's talk </fontspan>]]</small></sup> 15:57, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 
@Makrakis, there are dozens of books that name Moschopolis Aromanian metropolis [[http://www.google.com/search?q=moschopolis%2Bmetropolis&btnG=%CE%91%CE%BD%CE%B1%CE%B6%CE%AE%CF%84%CE%B7%CF%83%CE%B7+%CE%92%CE%B9%CE%B2%CE%BB%CE%AF%CF%89%CE%BD&tbs=bks%3A1&tbo=1&hl=el]]. Can you please check at least one before you continue with this discussion? Saying that all this meanstream bibliography is useless isn't something reasonable.
Line 213 ⟶ 217:
Actually Peyfuss adopts the 70,000 claim. Also he says that Albanian historians claim that the population was 20,000 or lower [[http://books.google.com/books?ei=ry42TPv_MYWXsQbEqZzPAQ&ct=result&hl=el&id=2MxpAAAAMAAJ&dq=moschopolis%2BPeyfuss&q=60.000%2Beinwohner#search_anchor]].[[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 20:04, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 
:Can't see the full context of Peyfuss though. Elsie we can see in full. --<sub><span style="border:1.5px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sulmues#top|<fontspan style = "color:white;background:navy;">'''Sulmues'''</fontspan>]]</span></sub><sup><small>[[User_talk:Sulmues|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;"> Let's talk </fontspan>]]</small></sup> 20:36, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 
::It's a well known book, actually all estimates are from 50,000 to 70,000. Albanian authors tend to minimized the number (per Peyfuss).[[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 21:01, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Line 223 ⟶ 227:
And Winnifrith, a specialist on the Aromanians adopts the 60,000 claim[[http://books.google.com/books?id=7zVpAAAAMAAJ&q=moschopolis%2B60,000&dq=moschopolis%2B60,000&hl=el&ei=rlE2TIHbBtKksQbllv20AQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CDwQ6AEwBTgK]]. However, none can be sure about the city's exact population number that time.[[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 22:33, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 
:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moscopole&diff=next&oldid=372463418 this edit] seems to be of another opinion. The statistics on the bottom are clearly clashing with what the main text is saying currently. No one can be sure but we have to think about how many people were served by 24 churches. The number in my opinion is between 10k and 20k. --<sub><span style="border:1.5px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sulmues#top|<fontspan style = "color:white;background:navy;">'''Sulmues'''</fontspan>]]</span></sub><sup><small>[[User_talk:Sulmues|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;"> Let's talk </fontspan>]]</small></sup> 13:13, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 
::I suggest we create a section about these estimates. No official data existed that time, although 18th cent. writers and travelers (like Thunmann) adopted the 60,000 number. I've also found some exaggerated estimates of 200,000 [[http://books.google.com/books?hl=el&id=VFkUREqRFswC&q=moschopolis#v=onepage&q=200%2C000&f=false]]. I believe all this stuff should fit in a section.[[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 20:32, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 
:::That's fine with me. --<sub><span style="border:1.5px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sulmues#top|<fontspan style = "color:white;background:navy;">'''Sulmues'''</fontspan>]]</span></sub><sup><small>[[User_talk:Sulmues|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;"> Let's talk </fontspan>]]</small></sup> 20:51, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 
Re the word "metropolis" -- in looking over the various sources cited in Talk and in the article, it becomes pretty clear that most of the uses of the term "metropolis" are in the sense of "mother country" or "homeland" (from the perspective of an emigrant or colonist), not in the sense of "very large city". This is especially clear in the Gilles de Rapper article, which is written by a French-speaking person and includes many uses of French terms. Other uses in the cited sources are referring to metropolis in the sense of the chief town of the Aromanians or of the region. In any case, I have tried to be more precise in the use of words -- 'metropolis' is too ambiguous, I think. --[[User:Macrakis|Macrakis]] ([[User talk:Macrakis|talk]]) 21:51, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Line 233 ⟶ 237:
== Pics ==
 
Can someone do pics mgmt here? I don't want to stir up any controversy. --<sub><span style="border:1.5px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sulmues#top|<fontspan style = "color:white;background:navy;">'''Sulmues'''</fontspan>]]</span></sub><sup><small>[[User_talk:Sulmues|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;"> Let's talk </fontspan>]]</small></sup> 16:04, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 
bravo sulmues the change of voskopoja to moscopole in historical context is laudable..[[Special:Contributions/87.202.53.82|87.202.53.82]] ([[User talk:87.202.53.82|talk]]) 16:55, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 
:Although I might have been of a different opinion in the past, and the consensus might change in future, for now in my opinion we should keep Moscopole throughout the article. It's the name in Aromanian and the city gained its notability in the 18th century, when it was mainly a Vlach city. In addition per respect of what the Vlachs have given to Albania (and Greece for that matter), we should conserve the Aromanian name. --<sub><span style="border:1.5px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sulmues#top|<fontspan style = "color:white;background:navy;">'''Sulmues'''</fontspan>]]</span></sub><sup><small>[[User_talk:Sulmues|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;"> Let's talk </fontspan>]]</small></sup> 13:03, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 
::Nationalistic future plans for wikipedia... That's very interesting, please read [[wp:what wikipedia is]].[[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 22:02, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 
:::I'm not saying that I will change opinion. I'm saying that consensus of other editors might substitute my opinion. --<sub><span style="border:1.5px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sulmues#top|<fontspan style = "color:white;background:navy;">'''Sulmues'''</fontspan>]]</span></sub><sup><small>[[User_talk:Sulmues|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;"> Let's talk </fontspan>]]</small></sup> 23:04, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 
::::That's what you exactly did on talk:Panajot Pano, when a troll appeared and you supported him. This doesn't mean that this is constructive: following trolls and support the 'hidden' pov.[[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 23:25, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 
:::::Alexi, get the facts straight and take the blinkers off your eyes. No one told me to take off all Voskopoje and substitute it with Moscopole. Panajot Pano has nothing to do with Moscopole. --<sub><span style="border:1.5px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sulmues#top|<fontspan style = "color:white;background:navy;">'''Sulmues'''</fontspan>]]</span></sub><sup><small>[[User_talk:Sulmues|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;"> Let's talk </fontspan>]]</small></sup> 03:03, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 
::::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moscopole&action=historysubmit&diff=374584442&oldid=374562003 Great edit by Athenean]. --<span style="font-family: Gothic;">[[User:Sulmues|'''<big>S<big><sub></sub></big></big>'''ulmues]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:Sulmues|talk]])</sup></span> 12:49, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Line 254 ⟶ 258:
Is the book by Ben Blushi [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moscopole&action=historysubmit&diff=372456871&oldid=372455109] "literature"? Seems more like a non-notable, pop culture anti-Muslim polemic. I also note that the novel itself is used as a ref, which is rather comical. Since I already know what the usual suspects are going to say, I'd be more interested in the opinion of neutral editors. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean|talk]]) 21:04, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 
:Although you might not need my opinion, I doubt that many people have read the book. I have. It's a fictional book about characters of Voskopoje. The plot of the book spans for two centuries and evolves around the city. The artistic value in my opinion is not one of the highest: Ben Blushi, although son of a very notable children's writer, Kico Blushi, doesn't seem to be at the heights of his father in literature, and seems more versed in politics (he is number two of the [[Socialist Party of Albania]] (after [[Edi Rama]])). That's just my opinion, though. Still the book's main character is the city of Voskopoje/Moscopole and the description of the city's belle epoque and its decline. It describes how the first people of Moscopole started to become Muslim and how internal wars between Muslims and Christians led to the destruction of the city. The controversy that the book generated was clearly notable both nationally and internationally. --<sub><span style="border:1.5px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sulmues#top|<fontspan style = "color:white;background:navy;">'''Sulmues'''</fontspan>]]</span></sub><sup><small>[[User_talk:Sulmues|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;"> Let's talk </fontspan>]]</small></sup> 13:00, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 
Moscopole has been the main topic for hundreds of books/media through the last 200 years. The current section is the definition of pov since it mentions just one work, and should go as per wp:advertisment.[[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 10:02, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 
:Why should it go Alexi? Give me other examples of literature on Moscopole and, if possible, enter them in that paragraph. It's not that we have hundreds of fictional books on the town and we should get rid of the bad ones. IMO it is notable and verifiable and should stay. --<sub><span style="border:1.5px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sulmues#top|<fontspan style = "color:white;background:navy;">'''Sulmues'''</fontspan>]]</span></sub><sup><small>[[User_talk:Sulmues|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;"> Let's talk </fontspan>]]</small></sup> 13:11, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 
::Actually this is the definition of pov:'' All Wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view, representing fairly, proportionately, and as far as possible without bias, '''all''' significant views that have been published by reliable sources.'' This isn't all but the tiniest fraction you could find.[[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 13:17, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 
:::I removed. If it's such a big deal, let's keep the poorest state of art. --<sub><span style="border:1.5px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sulmues#top|<fontspan style = "color:white;background:navy;">'''Sulmues'''</fontspan>]]</span></sub><sup><small>[[User_talk:Sulmues|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;"> Let's talk </fontspan>]]</small></sup> 13:47, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 
== What about a gallery section? ==
 
[http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&ns0=1&ns6=1&ns12=1&ns14=1&ns100=1&redirs=0&search=voskopoja&limit=500&offset=0].--<span style="font-family: Gothic;">[[User:Sulmues|'''<big>S<big><sub></sub></big></big>'''ulmues]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:Sulmues|talk]])</sup></span> 18:01, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
:Well, galleries are a bit depreciated. Be sure to read [[Wikipedia:Galleries#Image_galleries|this]] before making an attempt at one. Best. --'''[[User:Laveol|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#007700;">L<fontspan colorstyle="color:#009900;">a<fontspan colorstyle="color:#00aa00;">v<fontspan colorstyle="color:#00cc00;">e</fontspan>o</fontspan>l</fontspan></fontspan>]] <sup>[[User talk:Laveol|T]]</sup>''' 18:04, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 
::Someone brought some pics of a festival with no info on it. I suggest to remove them and potentially include them into an article on the festival, because they are misleading on the city. All I see is the Macedonian flag, which has little to do with the Vlach town. Next thing you know we'll see the flags of Albania and Greece. --<span style="font-family: Gothic;">[[User:Sulmues|'''<big>S</big>'''ulmues]] <sup>([[User talk:Sulmues|talk]])</sup></span> 11:02, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Line 609 ⟶ 613:
== There is no proof of two Gregory's in the printing press of Moscopole ==
 
Maximilian Peyfuss, that is the most credible source for the printing press of Moscopole, shows how the hypothesis on two Gregory's has no scientific backing. Gregory Konstandinidis, later became the Metropolitan of Durrës, and that is stated by Zabiras who was ahis contemporary. [[User:Anna Comnena|Anna Comnena]] ([[User talk:Anna Comnena|talk]]) 22:07, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
:Are you able to provide reliable sources to back this claim? [[User:Super Dromaeosaurus|<span style="color:#0099FF;">Super</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Super Dromaeosaurus|<span style="color:#800080;">Ψ</span>]] [[User talk:Super Dromaeosaurus|<span style="color:#E60026;">Dro</span>]] 23:20, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
::I will give e brief outline: In the case of Gregory the burden of proof falls on those who back the two-Gregories hypothesis. This second hypothesis was first made by Ivan [http://www.promacedonia.org/is2/is_2_8.htm#1_4 Ivan Snegarov in 1932] (p. 354–5), basing it on a thesome older notes by Zabiras (before 1804) where Gregory is mentioned in 18611761 and 18671767 ([https://books.google.be/books?id=87JSAAAAcAAJ 1872], p. 236, 244). After this, Albanian and Greek scholars have been following the same line of thought. However, in 1989 Max Demeter Peyfuss wrote a book on the printing press of Moscopole, becoming the main source for it and all ofthe publications made there. In it hePeyfuss shows how there is no scientific basis for claiming the existence of two Gregories in Moscopole at the same time. Furthermore, on Zabiras notes (shown above) both accounts lists books that are printed by the same person. Thus, giving the final proof that it is indeed only one Gregory.
::I will no go further into detail here. It seems a good idea to expand the article on Gregory to include all the different hypothesis on his identity. I will just note, that this article was recently merged, going through the regular process.
::Here are some sources:
Line 619 ⟶ 623:
::Geōrgios Iōannēs Zabiras (1872). ''Νεα Ελλας η Ελληνικον θεατρον,'' p. 236, 244 (Greek)
::Dhimitër Shuteriqi (1987). ''Marin Beçikemi dhe shkrime të tjera,'' Tirana, p. 105 (Albanian) [[User:Anna Comnena|Anna Comnena]] ([[User talk:Anna Comnena|talk]]) 07:30, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
:::I see. Yes, I believe it would be good to expand the article to include these issues. By the way, if Georgios Konstantinidis and Gregory of Durrës are the same person, what gives the Albanian name priority? Was he an ethnic Albanian? [[User:Super Dromaeosaurus|<span style="color:#0099FF;">Super</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Super Dromaeosaurus|<span style="color:#800080;">Ψ</span>]] [[User talk:Super Dromaeosaurus|<span style="color:#E60026;">Dro</span>]] 10:12, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
::::There is no consensus on his ethnic identity. Peyfuss does not talk about it at all. He might have been Aromanian, or even Greek, or indeed Albanian. During the 18th century the Patriarchy of Ohrid, as Heinrich Gelzer (1902) claims, was at the center of a movement that promoted local languages: Bulgarian, Albanian and Aromanian. It was as part of this movement that translations like that of Gregory happened. So, to get back to you last question, Gregory of Durrës is not his Albanian name (that would be Gregori i Durrësit), it is his English name, with 'Durrës' the current recognized name for this city in English. Hope that answered you questions. [[User:Anna Comnena|Anna Comnena]] ([[User talk:Anna Comnena|talk]]) 14:56, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
 
==Voskopoja in both Ottoman sources and Mitrou?==
A recent addition states that Ottoman documents from the 16th-17th centuries use the variant ''Voskopoja'', nevertheless Ottoman documents mention the following forms (from the very first appearance in records in 1697): Uskopol and later Iskupol, Oskopol. What's also surprising is that Mitrou mentions one name for this settlement ''Βοσκόπολις'' /Voskopolis not Vokopoja.[[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 03:41, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
:Yet another issue that needs to be addressed: why Moschopolis is the ''Aromanian'' rendering of the name. Is there a approach explanation on this?[[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 03:45, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
::Considering the Aromanian and Greek names are similar and the region was not in a traditionally Greek zone, I would expect it if this form first surged from the Aromanians. Though an explanation from the author should be provided indeed. [[User:Super Dromaeosaurus|<span style="color:#0099FF;">Super</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Super Dromaeosaurus|<span style="color:#800080;">Ψ</span>]] [[User talk:Super Dromaeosaurus|<span style="color:#E60026;">Dro</span>]] 07:55, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
:This is worth taking a look into. Can you send some sources talking about Mitrou's work? [[User:Super Dromaeosaurus|<span style="color:#0099FF;">Super</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Super Dromaeosaurus|<span style="color:#800080;">Ψ</span>]] [[User talk:Super Dromaeosaurus|<span style="color:#E60026;">Dro</span>]] 07:55, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 
* The new additions need some copyediting. For example, I don't understand this sentence: {{tq|In this way, regarding the events of the years 1660-1687, in agreements concluded between the monks of the monasteries, the notables and the archons of the three districts of the city, where the name of the city is given in the form ''Voskopoja''.}} There are more such examples. [[User:Super Dromaeosaurus|<span style="color:#0099FF;">Super</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Super Dromaeosaurus|<span style="color:#800080;">Ψ</span>]] [[User talk:Super Dromaeosaurus|<span style="color:#E60026;">Dro</span>]] 07:55, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
:::I can't understand it either. Indeed the addition appears problematic. About Mitrou;s description on Moscopole ([[http://digital.lib.auth.gr/record/126829/files/?ln=el]] vol.6 p. 307): "εις τούτα τα μέρη είναι πολίσματα ακουστά ''Βοσκόπολις'', Γκιόρτσα και τα λοιπά". Guess we have yet another case of misinterpreting primary material by Xhufi (and it's not the only such case of presenting primary sources the wrong way in his Vokospoja paper). [[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 17:38, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
::::I remember edit warring over the use of Xhufi. Was that settled? Is he a reliable source? [[User:Super Dromaeosaurus|<span style="color:#0099FF;">Super</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Super Dromaeosaurus|<span style="color:#800080;">メ</span>]] [[User talk:Super Dromaeosaurus|<span style="color:#E60026;">Dro</span>]] 18:08, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
:::::Xhufi was removed in cases his claims were controversial vs scholarship (or at least a better source tag was added on sporadic cases). The case was settled as Xhufi controversy subsided (as coordinator stated). Its problematic to say the least.[[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 21:04, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
::::::I believe the precise quotes are needed for the recent additions in order to see if we can perform further adjustments to the section. {{ping|Alltan}}, can you provide them?[[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 21:11, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
:::::::If you have CEEOL access you can see them (and you do because you have access to the Wikipedia library). Adding the quotes for every single bit of text from Xhufi will result in copyright infringement issues. If you are unable to find it, I can link it here: [https://www-ceeol-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/search/viewpdf?id=602134] I will make some adjustments to the additions when I have more time. Meanwhile stop accusing Xhufi without first seeing what he has to say. Ty [[User:Alltan|Alltan]] ([[User talk:Alltan|talk]]) 21:23, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
::::::::''stop accusing Xhufi without first seeing what he has to say.'' re: No, I'm stating that he is misrepresenting primary material and I proved that this material doesn't confirm Xhufi's statement. Mitrou doesn't use ''Voskopja'' he uses ''Βοσκόπολις'' (the later not an Albanian form). I also can't find where Xhufi supports the claim that: ''The city appears under the Albanian rendering Voskopoja in Ottoman documents from the 16th-17th centuries.'', can you provide us the specific quote? [[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 21:44, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
:::::::::{{u|Alltan}}, {{u|Alexikoua}}, a disclaimer. I've seen the absolutely undesirable disputes that have surged among Albanian and Greek editors in other articles. I would like it if this article stayed as a bastion of tranquility. So please let's avoid easily avoidable tone such as {{tq|Meanwhile stop accusing Xhufi...}}. I will also apply this advice on me.
:::::::::As for the quote of the text (which by the way occurs on pages 1[actually 9]-2[10], not 2-3[11] as cited in this article), it is the following: {{tq|We note on the other hand that, in the Ottoman documents that we have used, we systematically find the name under the variant "Voskopoja" and this fact does not seem to us to be unimportant. This form is also that used by Meletios, an 18th century author, in his geography text.}} The affirmation on the text seems to simply be wrong, unless Xhufi is analysing ''Voskopolis'' together with ''Voskopoja'' and separate from ''Moskopolis''. Not sure what to do here. [[User:Super Dromaeosaurus|<span style="color:#0099FF;">Super</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Super Dromaeosaurus|<span style="color:#800080;">Ψ</span>]] [[User talk:Super Dromaeosaurus|<span style="color:#E60026;">Dro</span>]] 14:37, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
:::::::::Xhufi is indeed considering the variants ''Voskopoja'' and ''Voskopolis'' together: {{tq|Indeed, this agglomeration appears late in historical documents under the name Voskopoja-Voskopol or under its other variant Moskopol.}} page 9. That the text in this article would only focus on ''Voskopoja'' would then be inappropriate. Apparently, after adressing he is analysing both variants together, he affirms {{tq|Under these circumstances, it can be assumed that the Voskopoja form was the oldest, used mainly by the Albanian population}} (page 10), even though ''Voskopolis'' is an obviously Greek form. He also calls variants starting with M (in contrast to those starting with V, that's how he apparently decided to split the ways of calling this settlement) as Aromanian even though ''Moskopolis'' is the most widely used Greek form and Aromanians also use forms starting with V.
:::::::::The "16th-17th centuries" part is indeed said by Xhufi in page 10. Whether it is factual is another thing. [[User:Super Dromaeosaurus|<span style="color:#0099FF;">Super</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Super Dromaeosaurus|<span style="color:#800080;">Ψ</span>]] [[User talk:Super Dromaeosaurus|<span style="color:#E60026;">Dro</span>]] 14:46, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
::::::::::I admit the author is interpreting various primary&secondary sources on a non-scholarly way. As you said he states 'Voskopoja' but it is obvious that this is the case of 'Voskopolis' or any other V- form form. All issues need to be addresed on a detailed basis. The list is big though.[[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 02:39, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
:::::::::::Before presenting a complete list it seems helpful to add that scholarship on the onomatological evidence in Moscopole presents a completely diferrent picture compared to Xhufi's conclusion.[[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 02:54, 28 March 2023 (UTC)