Content deleted Content added
→Sex trafficking allegations: Reply |
Trigaranus (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 48:
:::I am currently doing a deep dive into SRA research. I just finished her book. She absolutely mentions him in her book, several times throughout. The reason for me researching him right now.
:::Anneke is a brave soul. Her dedication to helping other survivors heal is beyond incredible. I hope to meet her someday. [[Special:Contributions/174.228.99.68|174.228.99.68]] ([[User talk:174.228.99.68|talk]]) 21:45, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
::::This might be an opinion too unpopular for YouTube, where I won't comment. If you watch Anneke Lucas' accounts (I have not read her book), there are a few moments where my alarm bells went off. One of the more egregious ones is that a countess from her pedophile network apparently wanted to know who Anneke's father was. She was a small child at that time, so we are talking early 1970s. According to Lucas, they took her blood to analyse it and established that she belonged to "one of the bloodlines", presumably some descent-group that was relevant to the network's interests. I cannot speak to Lucas being "a brave soul" or not. I don't know what her biography actually entails. But I know that there was no DNA-testing for human "bloodlines" in the early 1970s. There are many other elements of her story that make them dubious at best. E.g. that she was "deprogrammed" in a way that would ensure that she would never be successful in life, after she had been set up for stardom by the same network that apparently had groomed her to be a child sex slave. It just rings odd. Truth be told: I have as much faith in her origin story as in [[Buffy Sainte Marie]]'s (who alleged that her brother had sexually abused her, but only once he had become more outspoken about her being a [[pretendian]]). [[User:Trigaranus|Trigaranus]] ([[User talk:Trigaranus|talk]]) 20:33, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
| |||