Revision as of 16:45, 9 January 2018 edit 188.230.240.75 (talk) Attention drawn to misleading use of "permissiveness".~~~~ ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:20, 10 January 2018 edit undo Lowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs) Bots, Template editors 2,248,211 edits m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Received Pronunciation/Archive 3) (bot Next edit →
Line 42: :I agree on the reference. Another possible female addition could be Diana Athill. There is a reference [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/8730916/Diana-Athill-the-woman-who-spoke-so-well-I-couldnt-understand-her.html here], albeit from a rather poorly-written article. [[User:Epa101\|Epa101]] ([[User talk:Epa101\|talk]]) 13:25, 14 May 2017 (UTC) ::Thanks for the suggestion, but I read the article and couldn't find a reference to RP (though this was clearly what the writer had in mind). [[User:RoachPeter\|RoachPeter]] ([[User talk:RoachPeter\|talk]]) 17:44, 27 November 2017 (UTC) ~~== Vowel chart ==~~ Shouldn't we add a table which shows the difference in vowel realization between Contemporary RP and Traditional RP the way Upton (2004, see https://books.google.it/books?id=EeXI43AwwiEC&pg=PA241&dq=received+pronunciation+upton&hl=it&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjX7IaU-JvSAhVCvBQKHSXmAKoQ6AEIVzAI#v=onepage&q&f=false) and Pearce (2007) do, using lexical sets? This would allow for a better representation of the current state of the accent and the former standard. ~~[[User:Meyerbeer 91\|Meyerbeer 91]] ([[User talk:Meyerbeer 91\|talk]]) 10:27, 19 February 2017 (UTC)~~ == ʌ in the vowel table ==

Talk:Received Pronunciation: Difference between revisions