Content deleted Content added
→AccuWeather Controversy: undue |
→AccuWeather Controversy: Reply |
||
Line 49:
::'''Support''' Accuweather needs to stop overreacting with these forcasts and damage estimates [[User:Joseph Ca98|Joseph Ca98]] ([[User talk:Joseph Ca98|talk]]) 01:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
:'''Neutral''' I can't tell whether adding the information would be [[WP:UNDUE]] or not. <span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:100%;color:#00008B;background-color:transparent;;CSS">[[User:Zzzs|<sub>Z</sub>Z<sup>Z</sup>]][[User talk:Zzzs|'S]]</span> 01:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
::Switching to '''Oppose'''. The addition of this material is [[WP:UNDUE]]. I could not find any high-quality, let alone reliable sources by scientific publishers that has shown the AccuWeather forecast as accurate. My reasoning is also per JavaHurricane. <span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:100%;color:#00008B;background-color:transparent;;CSS">[[User:Zzzs|<sub>Z</sub>Z<sup>Z</sup>]][[User talk:Zzzs|'S]]</span> 14:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
*<s>'''Support ''if''''' [[User:WeatherWriter|nominator]] can provide a source. [[User:Quxyz|<span style="color: goldenrod">✶Qux</span>]][[User talk:Quxyz|<span style="color: goldenrod">yz</span>]][[special:contributions/Quxyz|<span style="color: goldenrod">✶</span>]] 03:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</s>
**Misinterpreted discussion, I thought that this was already policy honestly and there was someone exposing AccuWeather's shenanigans. [[User:Quxyz|<span style="color: goldenrod">✶Qux</span>]][[User talk:Quxyz|<span style="color: goldenrod">yz</span>]][[special:contributions/Quxyz|<span style="color: goldenrod">✶</span>]] 03:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
| |||