Talk:Usenet personality: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Dating comment by 216.16.54.94 - "a new category for Usenet Celebrity reflecting the fact that most posters are good people"
analysis of this entire Wikipedia site; Archimedes Plutonium never given a fair shake
Line 183:
presentation is of a negative overtone that is not representative of the bigger picture that Usenet
is composed mostly of good people, whose posts are valuable to read and learn. [[Special:Contributions/216.16.54.94|216.16.54.94]] ([[User talk:216.16.54.94|talk]])Superdeterminism <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 03:26, 22 January 2011 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
== Unfair and prejudicial treatment of Archimedes Plutonium by Wikipedia editors ==
 
It is easily seen from the discussion history of this site and from the older sites of Archimedes Plutonium that he
is treated unfairly. This site Usenet Celebrities was created because of the need to cover AP whose site was
torn down circa 2005 due to a Attorney General letter enquiry into Wikipedia because of the false racial slur
of a nickname "Arky" that the Wikipedia editors were trying to saddle AP with. So the AP site was torn down
for it was commented by outside observers that the AP site was mostly a mockfest with racial slurs and
works like "crank", "crackpot", "psychoceramics". Because it was torn down, and rapidly removed, Loadmaster--
David Tribble created this new site now called Usenet Celebrities in response to the AP removal.
 
Now comes the analysis of why Archimedes Plutonium is severely prejudiced by this site. At first Loadmaster
sandwiched AP in between criminals listed and it took AP several months to rectify that problem. Much of the
harsh words of "crank, crackpot, psychoceramics" were not removed for they are still seen in the references
cited. But worst of all, is that all the other persons listed in this site are afforded webpages, or archives or
specific Usenet posts as citations, but AP is not allowed or afforded that same respect. Having watched this
Wikipedia site for years now, it is my opinion that if DMacks were in charge that the entry of Archimedes
Plutonium would read like this: AP is a crackpot, a crank, a psychoceramic.
 
But since Loadmaster is the editor in charge of this site, AP's entry has the words crank crackpot and psychoceramic not listed
directly but indirectly in the references. It is my opinion that the reason AP is never afforded the same citations of webpage, archives
or Usenet posts is because, then Loadmaster cannot pelt or pommel AP with crank, crackpot or psychoceramic.
 
And in my opinion,the reason that criminals and MI5 appears in Usenet Celebrities is that the entire site is just a negative backdrop
to what DMacks, David Tribble and other Wikipedia editors wish to paint the picture of Archimedes Plutonium as a demon devil.
Mind you, they may not be doing it intentionally but subconsciously they hate AP so much that they do not know themselves of
what they do.
[[Special:Contributions/216.16.54.94|216.16.54.94]] ([[User talk:216.16.54.94|talk]]) Volcano Electricity-- our energy future to make fossil fuels obsolete