Content deleted Content added
TimothyRias (talk | contribs) assess |
|||
Line 22:
Disagree. Both "aspirator" and "jet pump" operates on the principle of venturi effect. However, in an aspirator the velocity of motive stream is sub-sonic and in the case of jet pumps it can be supersonic. I do hope that this distinction based on the speed of motive stream velocity defines the difference between an aspirator and a jet pump.[[User:Chitraeswar|Chitraeswar]] ([[User talk:Chitraeswar|talk]]) 10:54, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Disagree. If a customer of mine were to ask what a Jet Pump was, I would refer him to my Website
absolutely right... both articles should be merged
::Agree but the other way. I think the Aspirator is a specific type of the more general eductor pump. If anyone can point out a scheme for defining the line between the two, please go ahead. [[User:Egmason|Egmason]] ([[User talk:Egmason|talk]]) 09:58, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
:::Agree. First of all, a link to a site you're confirmed you own and that is used to vend products through isn't really suitable to have on a site that's supposed to be free of bias. I note another company doing the same thing with the peristaltic pumps article. Second, jet or aspirator... that depends entirely on what you call a jet. The hole the gas comes out of in a bunsen is termed 'the jet', and many other holes. The word has no defined meaning in relation to the sonic nature of the thing passing through it. Third, the size and use of the pump has nothing to do with the effect it uses, which is what these articles are all discussing, they're variants on the same thing. You can just stick pictures of a lab aspirator next to a big commercial pump and say, "same idea, different packages". Merge.
| |||