Revision as of 21:45, 9 June 2019 edit Austronesier (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 25,879 edits →Merge with Vasconic substratum theory ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:45, 9 June 2019 edit undo Austronesier (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 25,879 edits →Merge with Vasconic substratum theory Next edit →
Line 154: :Thanks, {{u\|Kwamikagami\|kwami}}! That exactly was my question, whether the term "Vasconic" has caught up beyond Vennemann's theory. As far as I can see, the term is only used in chapter 12 of Sinner & Velaza (2019). I am not quite sure what Gorrochategui and Vallejo actually refer to when using "Vasconic", especially on p. 362 "...another specific feature of the '''Vasconic and Aquitanian language'''...". As far as I can judge, Gorrochategui seems to use "Vasconic" as an adjective relating to the "Vascones" as mentioned in Roman sources. :But the main point is, you are right, as soon as serious scholars employ the term without reference to Vennemann's theory, a straight merge/redirect as I have suggested will be misleading. Thanks for pointing this out. And a dab would be a good idea then. :As for ~~Blevens~~Blevins, I would add a {{by whom}}-tag to her statement if it were a WP article ;). –[[User:Austronesier\|Austronesier]] ([[User talk:Austronesier\|talk]]) 21:45, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Vasconic languages: Difference between revisions