Content deleted Content added
Austronesier (talk | contribs) |
Austronesier (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 154:
:Thanks, {{u|Kwamikagami|kwami}}! That exactly was my question, whether the term "Vasconic" has caught up beyond Vennemann's theory. As far as I can see, the term is only used in chapter 12 of Sinner & Velaza (2019). I am not quite sure what Gorrochategui and Vallejo actually refer to when using "Vasconic", especially on p. 362 "...another specific feature of the '''Vasconic and Aquitanian language'''...". As far as I can judge, Gorrochategui seems to use "Vasconic" as an adjective relating to the "Vascones" as mentioned in Roman sources.
:But the main point is, you are right, as soon as serious scholars employ the term without reference to Vennemann's theory, a straight merge/redirect as I have suggested will be misleading. Thanks for pointing this out. And a dab would be a good idea then.
:As for
|