Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 188.120.85.251 - "→Murders of Marin Ueland: " |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (48 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown) | |||
Line 173:
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[WP:INVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
==Disambiguation link notification for July 27==
Line 212:
==Europe 10,000 Challenge invite==
Hi. The [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge]] has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland [[Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge]]. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like [[Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic)]]. For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon]], sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --[[User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao|<
== [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talk:Paul J. Morochnik]] ==
Line 394:
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
: {{u|Doug Weller}} thanks for the warning about the discretionary sanctions, I will steer clear of these topics in the future. My edit on [[Gender studies]] was reverted, imho the Vatican are not qualified to criticise GS due to them being inexpert, for instance per [[WP:SCHOLARSHIP]]. So Vatican comments better belong in [[Politics of Vatican City]] article, or some other Vatican-related article. [[User:1Kwords|1Kwords]] ([[User talk:1Kwords#top|talk]]) 17:13, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Line 470:
== November 2018 ==
This article - [[Education in Sweden]] uses a [[WP:LDR|list-defined]] reference format. When you remove content and references like you did [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Education_in_Sweden&oldid=870372295 here], you created a <strong class="error">cite error</strong> visible at the bottom of the references section. When removing content, you must either remove the reference in the reference section too or in the alternative [[WP:HIDDEN|comment it out]]. I have fixed the error for you. Please use the {{button|Show preview}} button in the future to avoid mistakes like this. Thanks.[[User:Isaidnoway|<
==A couple of discretionary sanctions notices==
Line 478:
For additional information, please see the [[WP:AC/DS#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[WP:ArbCom|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 13:20, 30 November 2018 (UTC).
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''
Line 485:
For additional information, please see the [[WP:AC/DS#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[WP:ArbCom|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Editing of Biographies of Living Persons|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 13:20, 30 November 2018 (UTC).
==Disambiguation link notification for December 2==
Line 644:
::'parent cats' wasn't a reference to feline breeding! It's abbreviated admittedly, but since the categories removed were immediately below the ones that remained - I assumed others would actually assess the edit before jumping to conclusions. Apology accepted. [[User:Pincrete|Pincrete]] ([[User talk:Pincrete|talk]]) 12:22, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
::: The "motive" tag is deleted in the infobox and the jihadist motive was not in the lead section either. The article could be improved on those points. Nowhere have I disputed an anti-LGBT motive. [[User:1Kwords|A Thousand Words]] ([[User talk:1Kwords#top|talk]]) 12:38, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
== Please be more careful with your reverts and don't restore vandalism ==
As you did here where you restored vandalism of a citation.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=French_ban_on_face_covering&type=revision&diff=978658670&oldid=978636333] Thanks. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 15:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
== Racist content ==
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Somalis_in_Sweden&diff=978157950&oldid=978121643 This content] you added/restored looks like [[anti-black racism]] to me, and it has been objected to by three users (including me). Does it also not look racist to you? At the very least, including such content would involve presenting it as neutrally. '''[[User:Vice regent|VR]]''' <sub>[[User talk:Vice regent|<b style="color:Black">talk</b>]]</sub> 13:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
: {{Ping|Vice regent}} I’m having similar issues with this user RE racism, check out their additions to [[identity fraud]]. [[User:Horse Eye's Back|Horse Eye's Back]] ([[User talk:Horse Eye's Back|talk]]) 16:25, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
== Hebdo aftermath ==
By pure chance, I came across this last night, [https://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/sep/26/suspect-in-new-charlie-hebdo-attack-angered-by-republished-cartoons-say-paris-police Suspect in new Charlie Hebdo attack angered by republished cartoons, say Paris police] about a recent event in which there appears to be a clear and explicit link to the original attack. The source on the text I removed makes no such connection. [[User:Pincrete|Pincrete]] ([[User talk:Pincrete|talk]]) 06:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message ==
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2020|2020 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/03&oldid=990308186 -->
==Your draft article, [[Draft:Römosseskolan]]==
[[File:Information icon4.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]
Hello, 1Kwords. It has been over six months since you last edited the [[WP:AFC|Articles for Creation]] submission or [[WP:Drafts|Draft]] page you started, "[[Draft:Römosseskolan|Römosseskolan]]".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia [[WP:mainspace|mainspace]], the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Römosseskolan|edit the submission}} and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at [[WP:REFUND/G13|this link]]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! <!-- Template:Db-draft-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:UnitedStatesian|UnitedStatesian]] ([[User talk:UnitedStatesian|talk]]) 13:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
== ARBPIA ==
Hi, the article [[Gaza Strip]] is subject to a 1RR and your last edit violates that. Further, you are simply mistaken on policy here. What you are removing is not a rumor or a Wikipedia editor's view, it is a verifiable and sourced projection. Please a. self-revert to correct the 1 revert rule violation, and b. discuss your edit on the talk page. Thank you. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<span style="color:#C11B17">nableezy</span>]]''' - 07:30, 27 December 2020 (UTC)</small>
: Ok I will start a discussion on the article talk page, where nableezy ought to have started it. [[User:1Kwords|A Thousand Words]] ([[User talk:1Kwords#top|talk]]) 07:33, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
: Discussion continues [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gaza_Strip#Gaza_Strip_..._to_be_uninhabitable_by_2020 here]. [[User:1Kwords|A Thousand Words]] ([[User talk:1Kwords#top|talk]]) 07:52, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
==Gender mainstreaming at Uppsala University==
Hi, I reverted your edit [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Uppsala_University&diff=prev&oldid=999473228 here] because it was in fact not correct, and because it was not information that belonged in the lede (even if it had been edited to remove the misleading text). The source you linked, a minimal blurb, did not claim that work was started in August 2020 (I'm not sure how "fortsätter att utveckla arbetet" could be interpreted as "began the process"), and the actual document linked in that blurb discussed the work that was carried out in 2017-2019, following a decision in 2016 – which was also mentioned in the blurb. As far as I can understand from the source, the only thing that is new about the government directive from 2020 is that universities and university colleges are required to document their efforts. That's not information that belongs in the lede section of an individual university. Of course every university would like to be seen as a paragon of gender equality, but Wikipedia articles are not the mouthpiece for the subject of the article. So ordinary gender mainstreaming work is not something that belongs in the WP article unless secondary sources discuss it. Regards, --''[[User:Bonadea|bonadea]]'' <small>[[Special:Contributions/Bonadea|contributions]] [[User talk:Bonadea|talk]]</small> 11:56, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
== January 2021 ==
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=Warning icon]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at [[:Uppsala University]], you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. ''It is not exactly a COI problem when somebody who works for an organisation removes text that appears to be added only to praise that organisation.''<!-- Template:uw-error3 --> ''[[User:Bonadea|bonadea]]'' <small>[[Special:Contributions/Bonadea|contributions]] [[User talk:Bonadea|talk]]</small> 14:21, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
In [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Uppsala_University&diff=next&oldid=999480651 your edit summary] you said, among other things, "...the UU press release says "the work continues"". Could you explain why you chose to use the incorrect wording "began the process", which is not only unsupported in your source but actually contradicted by it? Again, we don't need the university's own press release talking about their gender equality work. If there is anything special about it, find it in reliable secondary sources, and add it in an appropriate place in the article, not in the lede. Thanks. --''[[User:Bonadea|bonadea]]'' <small>[[Special:Contributions/Bonadea|contributions]] [[User talk:Bonadea|talk]]</small> 14:24, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
: {{u|Bonadea}} you are a [[WP:COI|Conflict-of-interest]] editor on Uppsala University page as this is your workplace per your own user page. I have [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Uppsala_University#Gender_mainstreaming_at_UU started the discussion in the appropriate forum]. Adding material from reliable sources, even if a primary source in this case, is not disruptive editing. So in the spirit of cooperation you are invited to remove this warning. [[User:1Kwords|A Thousand Words]] ([[User talk:1Kwords#top|talk]]) 14:39, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
::The warning was not for "adding material from reliable sources". It was for restoring factually incorrect text. Since you took the time to write a long edit summary, you would have had the time to actually correct the content; I would still have opposed its inclusion since I think it is inappropriately promotional and absolutely not appropriate for the lede (as I have said above and on the article talk page), but if it hadn't been actually incorrect there would not have been any reason to warn you for disruptive editing, nor to revert your edit. You are obviously free to remove any warnings from your own user talk page. Regards, --''[[User:Bonadea|bonadea]]'' <small>[[Special:Contributions/Bonadea|contributions]] [[User talk:Bonadea|talk]]</small> 14:50, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
== A request for some article expansion support ==
Greetings,
Requesting your visit articles [[Islamic advice literature]], [[Draft:Aurats (word)]] and some article expansion support if you find articles interested.
Thanks and warm regards
[[User:Bookku|Bookku]] ([[User talk:Bookku|talk]]) 09:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
== Anti wastren and islamism ==
Hello, I noticed that you have restored the article you deleted. I want to explain the reason why I deleted it first. The article spreads hatred and false beliefs. There is no need to mention such detailed words. It is only necessary to mention the names of the terrorist groups [[User:Mouzac12|Mouzac12]] ([[User talk:Mouzac12|talk]]) 11:30, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
== Edit-warring on [[Immigration to Sweden]] ==
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|the bold, revert, discuss cycle]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->. [[User:Snooganssnoogans|Snooganssnoogans]] ([[User talk:Snooganssnoogans|talk]]) 16:13, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
:A Thousand Words: From what you said at RSN, it's apparent you still don't understand what edit warring is which is a serious problem so I'll repeat what I've said there in case you don't read it. I strongly suggest you re-read [[WP:Edit warring]] if you want to continue to edit without being blocked. Edit warring is when editors repeatedly revert someone else's good faith change. It doesn't matter whether you're adding material or removing material although from what I saw you were doing both in your edit anyway, as highlighted by Szmenderowiecki, nor who's changes are right or wrong, nor whether your changes are sourced, and whatever else. Note it's obvious from this that it generally takes two to edit war, this is a well accepted maxim. Neither party to an edit war is generally considered right, again no matter who's changes may be right. Although generally speaking, per [[WP:BRD]] when there is a dispute regardless of sources etc, we keep the stable version before the disputed change pending discussion and consensus. But separately per [[WP:1AM]] etc, if one editor keeps making a change and multiple other editors are reverting them, the one editor is more likely to get into trouble. Per our policy it's only in cases like vandalism (which isn't good faith anyway), enforcement of overriding policies like BLP and edits from blocked/banned editors where it would not be edit warring, and none of this applied here. Also you've proven by your response that Snooganssnoogan warning was fully justified as you apparently did not even after the warning understand what edit warring was about. It's unfortunate you still did not understand, I suggest you pay attention to what you're being told rather than automatically dismissing such warnings because you think they're unjustified. [[User:Nil Einne|Nil Einne]] ([[User talk:Nil Einne|talk]]) 07:54, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
::I won't bother to say this at RSN since the discussion is already completely off-topic but for further clarity, you made this change [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Immigration_to_Sweden&diff=1041200650&oldid=1041073018] which to simplify, I'll say was fine as a BOLD edit. Snooganssnoogan made this edit reverting you [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Immigration_to_Sweden&diff=1041247189&oldid=1041200650] which while technically the start of an edit war, I'll also say was fine as a reversion of a BOLD edit. The next step is 'discuss', however putting aside the one edit marking a request for help as answered, the talk page has not been edited for nearly 2 years. Clearly the discuss part completely failed, one if you should have started the discussion. Instead of discussing (an edit summary isn't discussion), you simply reintroduced your changes [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Immigration_to_Sweden&diff=1041271653&oldid=1041247189]. We're now clearly in edit war territory. Note to be clear, even if you'd opened a discussion on the talk page, if you reverted before some consensus in the discussion this would stil be edit warring. To their credit, Snooganssnoogan brought it up in RSN. Personally I would have preferred to start at the article talk page, but they did try to discuss and importantly didn't continue the edit war. While technically EverGreenFir's was also a continuation of that edit war, considering the RSN discussion had already started by then and their change wasn't a simple reversion and their edit seems to have stuck with some further modifications, I think their editing was reasonable under the circumstances [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Immigration_to_Sweden&diff=1041287698&oldid=1041271653]. In other words, when we look at this, the only real conclusion is that you were the primary problem. Again, please don't make the mistake of thinking because you're introducing a sourced change, continuing to revert to keep it there isn't an edit war. That isn't how things work. [[User:Nil Einne|Nil Einne]] ([[User talk:Nil Einne|talk]]) 08:18, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
== August 2021 ==
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=Warning icon]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. <!-- Template:uw-npov3 --> ''[[User:Bonadea|bonadea]]'' <small>[[Special:Contributions/Bonadea|contributions]] [[User talk:Bonadea|talk]]</small> 17:26, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
== Comment moved ==
I moved the comment [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Islam_in_Finland&diff=1053250792&oldid=1053207961 you made here] as it was smack in the middle of my comment and made it seem like I said it, when in fact you said it. I think you should put your responses ''after'' my comment, not in the middle of them. Thanks '''[[User:Vice regent|VR]]''' <sub>[[User talk:Vice regent|talk]]</sub> 20:34, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
: {{u|Vice regent}} the idea was to tag it as ''my comment'' with a parenthesis and user/timestamp to clearly mark it as mine. If you think it's better at the bottom, fine with me. [[User:1Kwords|A Thousand Words]] ([[User talk:1Kwords#top|talk]]) 05:14, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
::I think what you did now is fine, thanks.'''[[User:Vice regent|VR]]''' <sub>[[User talk:Vice regent|talk]]</sub> 13:06, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message ==
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2021|2021 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1056563210 -->
== Unreliable source ==
Moved discussion to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Islam_in_Finland#Unreliable_source_(moved_here) talk page] of [[Islam in Finland]] article where it belongs. [[User:1Kwords|A Thousand Words]] ([[User talk:1Kwords#top|talk]]) 07:32, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
*Your [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Islam_in_Finland&diff=1058319912&oldid=1058233416 last comment] still doesn't explain why you think www.alandsnyheter.com is a reliable source. The reason I posted on your talk page, not the article talk page, is that if this is not a reliable source, then this might constitute a behavior issue. The editorial you posted ends with "Photo: Laura Kotila, Prime Minister's Office". Yet the website seems to have modified the picture heavily to include Islamophobic tropes, as I highly doubt that the Finnish Prime Minister provided them such a provocative image.'''[[User:Vice regent|VR]]''' <sub>[[User talk:Vice regent|talk]]</sub> 21:08, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
== ANI notice ==
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> '''[[User:Vice regent|VR]]''' <sub>[[User talk:Vice regent|talk]]</sub> 01:12, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
== December 2021 ==
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]''' from editing because it appears that you are [[Wikipedia:Here to build an encyclopedia#Clearly not being here to build an encyclopedia|not here to build an encyclopedia]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#006400;">Girth</span> <span style="font-family:Impact;color:#4B0082;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 16:54, 12 December 2021 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:Uw-nothereblock -->
| |||