Content deleted Content added
Setanta Saki (talk | contribs) |
Setanta Saki (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 268:
Unless you are a medical expert, which I am by the way, it would be beneficial if you stopped trying to prevent the addition of actual legitimately referenced scientific material to articles. If you would like to come to a compromise let me know otherwise I think we will have to possibly revert to arbitration. [[User:Setanta Saki|Setanta Saki]] ([[User talk:Setanta Saki|talk]]) 19:05, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
:{{tps}} Setana please read [[WP:MEDRS]]; the content you added is not OK. I'll add the template to the Talk page that helps editors find sources that comply with MEDRS. But this is a conversation that should be happening at [[Talk:Soursop]], in any case. [[User:Jytdog|Jytdog]] ([[User talk:Jytdog|talk]]) 19:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
::: Okay as a medical professional I totally understand the concern, however those are expressed guidelines not hard rules nor were any actual medical claims being put forth just expressed interest in ongoing "potential" areas of as seen in scientific/cancer research. There should be logical flexibility, also literature/Systematic reviews are classed as the absolute ideal understandably. But to expect that in this relativity new case especially when it is natural compounds being recently examined is far too hard line frankly, to not reflect or even mention some or any of the primary source areas of research which will form the basis of those future reviews is frankly a little extreme. Graviola was included in an overall natural products review in a cancer treatment review journal one of the references. <ref>
Also is this ideal literature/systemic review reference requirement being imposed on the the unproven "potential" neurotoxicity claim outlined in the article many of the links are broken and are primary source or open letters?. Lastly I did not edit war as claimed, I started another new heading to separate any implied medical/health claims ad wanted to reflect current areas of in the natural compounds, I wrote a totally different introduction and added different referenced links to some well known cancer journals.
| |||