Content deleted Content added
→Veteran's and Peoples Party: new section |
dablink notification message (see the FAQ) Tag: Disambiguation links added |
||
| (47 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
==Welcome!==
Line 30:
| <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 1em;border-radius:10px; font-size: 1.1em;">
Hi '''Uamaol'''! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at [[WP:Teahouse|the Teahouse]]! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from '''other new editors'''. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and '''get advice from your peers'''. I hope to see you there! {{noping|Technical 13}} ([[w:en:WP:Teahouse/Hosts|I'm a Teahouse host]])
<div class="submit ui-button ui-widget ui-state-default ui-corner-all ui-button-text-only" role="button" aria-disabled="false"><span class="ui-button-text">[[WP:Teahouse|Visit the Teahouse]]</span></div><small
</div>
|}
Line 1,613:
==Asian 10,000 Challenge invite==
Hi. The [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge]] has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland [[Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge]]. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like [[Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic)]]. For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon]] which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --[[User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao|<
== Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot ==
Line 3,572:
Is there anyway you can help with ensuring this page is factual and current. Vif12vf persists in having the party labelled Right-Wing with no evidence to support such a label yet VAPP website and manifesto has them identified as Centrist. I have googled and found no sources that indicate the party to be Right-Wing. Your assistance is greatly appreciated[[User:Dingapottamuss|Dingapottamuss]] ([[User talk:Dingapottamuss|talk]]) 18:16, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message ==
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2020|2020 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/06&oldid=990308429 -->
==Disambiguation link notification for January 8==
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[B&M]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Barking]]<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/B%26M check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/B%26M?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 06:36, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
== League of Mercy ==
Thank you for your help with the vandalism on [[League of Mercy]]. I was unaware of your major revision, which would have been much easier for me to go back to instead of going through it line by line. If the vandalism on it continues, I think we should seek semi-protect status for it. [[User:Ortolan57|Ortolan57]] ([[User talk:Ortolan57|talk]]) 17:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
==Disambiguation link notification for July 14==
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Wyldecrest Parks]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Abingdon]]<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Wyldecrest_Parks check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Wyldecrest_Parks?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 05:59, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
==Disambiguation link notification for August 4==
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Asphalt Princess]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Canada Building]]<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Asphalt_Princess check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Asphalt_Princess?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 06:00, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message ==
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2021|2021 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1056563328 -->
==Disambiguation link notification for December 19==
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Tin whistle]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Great Britain and Ireland]]<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Tin_whistle check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Tin_whistle?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 06:00, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
==Concern regarding [[User:Uamaol/Lorus]]==
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, Uamaol. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that [[User:Uamaol/Lorus]], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months [[WP:G13|may be deleted]], so if you wish to retain the page, please [[Special:EditPage/User:Uamaol/Lorus|edit it]] again or [[WP:USERFY|request]] that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can [[Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13|request it be undeleted]] so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. [[User:FireflyBot|FireflyBot]] ([[User talk:FireflyBot|talk]]) 06:03, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
==Disambiguation link notification for July 27==
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Ross McWhirter]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[La Vergne]]<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ross_McWhirter check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ross_McWhirter?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message ==
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2022|2022 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1124425179 -->
== July 2023 ==
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Britain First]]. Your edits appear to be [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive]] and have been or will be [[Help:Reverting|reverted]].
* If you are engaged in an article [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|content dispute]] with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the [[:Talk:Britain First|article's talk page]], and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] page, and ask for independent help at one of the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution requests|relevant noticeboards]].
* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents|Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]].
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies and guidelines]], and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|loss of editing privileges]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> [[User:DanielRigal|DanielRigal]] ([[User talk:DanielRigal|talk]]) 23:04, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
==Disambiguation link notification for September 23==
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Housing estate]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Britain]]<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Housing_estate check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Housing_estate?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 06:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
==[[:Category:Tristanian medical doctors]]==
Please see [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_September_29#Category%3ATristanian_medical_doctors]]. – [[User:Fayenatic london|Fayenatic]] [[User talk:Fayenatic london|'''<span style="color:#FF0000;">L</span>'''ondon]] 12:13, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message ==
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2023|2023 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1187132262 -->
==Disambiguation link notification for January 3==
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[5 ft 3 in gauge railways]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Britain]]<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/5_ft_3_in_gauge_railways check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/5_ft_3_in_gauge_railways?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 06:05, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
==Disambiguation link notification for February 12 ==
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[William Campbell-Taylor]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Hackney]].
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 06:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
== William Campbell-Taylor ==
User [[User:Uamaol]]
Please refer to the following Wikipedia policies in relation to your editing:
1. See [[WP:OWN]] [[Template:In use]] Template was placed more than 24 hours ago, last edit more than 5 hours ago. "Specifying periods of around a day or longer for this template goes against the spirit of simply avoiding edit conflicts...If this template has been left in place for more than two hours since the last edit, you may assume the placing editor has forgotten to remove it, and you may remove it yourself"
You have blocked editing by others of the article with the InUse for more than 24 hours sometimes with several hours between editing - in contravention of this policy, and a breach of [[WP:OWN]]
2. See [[WP:BLPSELFPUB]] [[WP:BLPSELFPUB]] "Use of self-published source by the subject himself...Such material may be used as a source only if: it does not involve claims about third parties;[d] If a self-published denial does additionally make claims about third parties, those additional claims do fall under this criteria, and do not merit inclusion in Wikipedia". Likewise where copied and repeated by the subject's personal friend.
I share the concern that [[WP:BLP]] should have [[WP:RELIABLE]] non-self published sources, and Wikipedia policies therefore do not allow the subject's self-published sources to make claims about third parties
3. See [[WP:PUBLICFIGURE]] [[WP:BLPPUBLIC]] The subject is a public figure. "If an allegation or incident is noteworthy, relevant, and well documented, it belongs in the article—even if it is negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it". The [[Church of England Newspaper]] is a respected and authoritative source where the newspaper's Editor reports on the current official live legal Clergy Discipline Measure 2003 against the subject, and this source is quoted directly without editor comment or opinion. See [[WP:NPOV]] balance of material.
In relation to [[WP:NPOV]] you have reverted or deleted respected, reliable and independent sources pertaining to the subject, without explanation, while keeping self-published sources.
This is disruptive editing. [[User:WhiteHartInn|WhiteHartInn]] ([[User talk:WhiteHartInn|talk]]) 00:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
:I am happy to discuss with you collaboration in the editing of the page to avoid edit conflict. [[User:WhiteHartInn|WhiteHartInn]] ([[User talk:WhiteHartInn|talk]]) 00:43, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
::{{ping|WhiteHartInn}}
::I previously asked you nicely to stop editing the article due to edit conflicts, yet you persisted, which in itself is disruptive editing. You have since reverted my edits twice now. As I previously stated, I am actively making a major edit to the article, therefore to actively abide by the two hour guideline you mentioned is not assuming good faith. Instead of continually using the edit summaries as your soapbox, put something in the article talk page and ping me.
::Your last edits to the article were back in December and consisted solely of a self-published source consisting of a letter complaint, and before this every edit since your account creation on 6 September 2023 has been minor copy editing. The contributions that I am allegedly blocking are actually complaints about my editing and not new content. It's interesting that you are mentioning [[WP:OWN]] as your actions are showing perceived ownership of the article.
::The self-published source that you keep removing is there as a direct link to the source of the secondary source provided (City Matters). As per [[WP:SECONDARY]]: ''A secondary source provides thought and reflection based on primary sources, generally at least one step removed from an event. It contains analysis, evaluation, interpretation, or synthesis of the facts, evidence, concepts, and ideas taken from primary sources.'' There's a single self-published source as opposed to "sources", which technically complies with [[WP:ABOUTSELF]]. This partially breaks rule #2 of "not involv[ing] claims about third parties", however the source relates directly towards what the subject has experienced, and involves a secondary source beside it for scrutiny.
::I agree with you about NPOV, however when I found this article whilst reading about City of London ward elections I was shocked at how heavily libellous it was and gave undue weight towards negative allegations against the subject, coupled with awful sourcing. The state it was in would have given Campbell-Taylor sufficient grounds to sue the Wikimedia Foundation on the grounds of defamation and part our duty as editors we must strive towards preventing such. As per [[WP:LIBEL]] ''[sic] It is the responsibility of all contributors to ensure that the material posted on Wikipedia is not defamatory. It is a Wikipedia policy to immediately delete libelous material when it has been identified... Libelous material (otherwise known as defamation) is reasonably likely to damage a person or company's reputation and could expose Wikipedia to legal consequences.'' As per [[WP:UNDUE]] ''Undue weight can be given in several ways, including but not limited to the depth of detail, the quantity of text, prominence of placement, the juxtaposition of statements, and the use of imagery.''
::As per [[WP:AGF]], ''Assuming good faith (AGF) means assuming that people are not deliberately trying to hurt Wikipedia, even when their actions are harmful. This is a fundamental principle on Wikipedia. Most people try to help the project, not hurt it. If this were untrue, a project like Wikipedia would be doomed from the beginning.''
::Wikipedia's fifth pillar ([[WP:5P5]]) '''Wikipedia has no firm rules:''' ''Wikipedia has policies and guidelines, but they are not carved in stone; their content and interpretation can evolve over time. The principles and spirit matter more than literal wording, and sometimes improving Wikipedia requires making exceptions. Be bold, but not reckless, in updating articles. And do not agonize over making mistakes: they can be corrected easily because (almost) every past version of each article is saved.''
::I have no issues with negative press on individuals, and am guilty of adding it on other BLPs, however some of the content that was present is very fishy, in contrast to some that I have found of the internet, including in the sources, which is downright bonkers. The solution to the stalement is to ignore articles with inuse tags and come back to them a few days afterwards and remove them if unnecessary. On the matter of NPOV, I am happy to collaborate.[[User:Uamaol|UaMaol]] ([[User talk:Uamaol#top|talk]]) 02:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Uamaol}}
:::It is good we are talking. Firstly, I have never reverted any of your edits. In accordance with my reading of what seemed clearly stated Wikipedia policies for [[Template:In use]] and time limits for that, and as per [[WP:AGF]] I saw your InUse template hanging for well over 2 hours with no editing by you - and in good faith I followed policy - and did not revert your edits, which I have never done, but edited myself including adding verifiably sourced content. If you had communicated with me and explained that you were going to be doing your major edit for X length of time, I would have understood and of course left it to you for that whole specified period, but instead you simply reverted my edit, and maintained the tag for much longer than the Wikipedia policies state - without explanation, giving the impression of [[WP:OWN]]. But that is water under the bridge and it is good we are communicating now.
:::As I have reached out to you, I am happy to collaborate to achieve [[WP:CONSENSUS]] on the article.
:::In relation to content, the retention of self-published material by the subject that makes allegations about third parties - particularly when the said third party has brought live, active legal proceedings against the subject for alleged abuse offences - is not merely a partial breach of rule #2 of [[WP:ABOUTSELF]], it is an evident breach. It is also a breach in England of Section 1 of the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Acts 1992 to 2003, prohibiting any publication which may indirectly identify a purported victim of an alleged offence, which some of what the subject's blog says does. It is widely known that the journalist who rehearses in her articles what the subject says is a close friend-cum-ex-partner of the subject. While her first article about the distribution of flyers during the election might be argued to be as you say [[WP: SECONDARY]] "A secondary source provides thought and reflection based on primary sources, generally at least one step removed from an event"...her second article which is a blog and plainly a verbatim copy-and-paste job from the subject's self-published personal blog in which he attacks and makes self-published claims about an alleged victim who has filed complaints and instituted legal proceedings against the subject for alleged offences - that is not a genuinely independent secondary source.
:::In relation to achieving [[WP:NPOV]] in content and space of content, the allegations by the subject against third parties need to be balanced against the reported fact that his alleged victim has brought official legal proceedings against the subject who is a [[Public figure]] - and we both agree that robustly independent, trustworthy and reliable sources need to apply. On both sides. The sources written by the Editor of a national Church of England newspaper is such a robust, independent and reliable source. In order to achieve dispassionate neutrality, I have always simply quoted directly verbatim from the independent reliable source without any commentary or paraphrasing of my own.
:::As you suggest, I am happy to let a few days pass, and then re-engage in editing towards [[WP:NPOV]]. I have no problem with the other content you have added to the article which is fair enough. [[User:WhiteHartInn|WhiteHartInn]] ([[User talk:WhiteHartInn|talk]]) 09:10, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
::::I have just discovered this reply and I'm a tad blown away by some of the things you've brought to the table. Firstly, you reverted my edits twice on 12 February. As previously stated about policies ''they are not carved in stone.'' Before editing this article I had no reason to be in contact with you, therefore would have no reason to alert you about edits. It was not obvious before deciding to edit this article that you would be be so protective over its contents.
::::Consensus can be made, but you keep stating in edit summaries that consensus has already been established when it very clearly has not been!
::::I have removed the self-published source, however I only had it in there to back up the secondary source. On Wikipedia it's very common to see a secondary source followed by a primary one, so a news article about a tweet followed by the actual tweet, for example.
::::If you genuinely believe that the blog and the article by City Matters does indeed break the law then take it up with the [[City of London Police]]. Regardless of legality, if it's published, like these two sources are, it's fair game. They were both published almost six and half years ago. Are you trying to imply that I am committing an offence in adding the sources? Where exactly in the blog does he identify the alleged victim?
::::{{tq|''It is widely known that the journalist who rehearses in her articles what the subject says is a close friend-cum-ex-partner of the subject.''}} Widely known by who exactly? I tried Googling her twice and found nothing. What's your source of this alleged COI? Do you know her personally?
::::It's interesting that you complain about a "copy-and-paste job" when you keep insisting on keeping your own contributions of the very same nature. News articles and encyclopæedias are not the same things and require different writing styles. Excessive quotation is not encyclopædic and is honestly lazy editing. You do it too much and your individual edits will literally be deleted (not even just reverted) by an admin for [[WP:COPYVIO]].
::::I've seen no indication that the Church of England Newspaper (COEN) is a reliable source. It's a glorified religious newsletter. City Matters is questionably reliable also, however as a local newspaper it has some level of notability as a source. COEN is independent of the Church of England and is privately run by the for-profit company, ''Political and Religious Intelligence Ltd.'' The [[Church Times]] has at least three times the circulation, also.
::::Do not insert excessive quotes, paraphrase. [[User:Uamaol|UaMaol]] ([[User talk:Uamaol#top|talk]]) 02:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
== The Mary Wallopers "Anglophobia" ==
Hi there [[User:Uamaol|Uamaol]], I saw that you were also involved in the "Anglophobia"... conflict, shall we say, on [[The Mary Wallopers]]. There's [[Talk:The Mary Wallopers#Anglophobic|a discussion]] happening on the talk about it's inclusion, if you'd like to weigh in. [[User:Xx78900|Xx78900]] ([[User talk:Xx78900|talk]]) 23:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
:{{ping|Xx78900}} Belated cheers! :) [[User:Uamaol|UaMaol]] ([[User talk:Uamaol#top|talk]]) 18:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
==Disambiguation link notification for April 18 ==
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Ronald S. Mangum]], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages [[Evanston]] and [[New York]].
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 06:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
==Disambiguation link notification for May 3 ==
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
:[[Anti-Irish sentiment]]
::added a link pointing to [[Barking]]
:[[Irish people in Great Britain]]
::added a link pointing to [[Barking]]
:[[White Irish]]
::added a link pointing to [[Barking]]
:[[White people in the United Kingdom]]
::added a link pointing to [[Barking]]
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 05:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
== May 2024 ==
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Uamaol|your contributions]] to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, [[WP:Copyrights|Wikipedia's licensing]] does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]] at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and [[Help:Link#Wikilinks|linking]] to the copied page, e.g., <code>copied content from <nowiki>[[page name]]</nowiki>; see that page's history for attribution</code>. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at [[Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-copying --> [[User:Cordless Larry|Cordless Larry]] ([[User talk:Cordless Larry|talk]]) 07:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
:{{ping|Cordless Larry}} Which article are the referring to? My edit summaries show me showing attribution. [[User:Uamaol|UaMaol]] ([[User talk:Uamaol#top|talk]]) 17:52, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
::It came to my attention via [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Irish_people_in_Great_Britain&diff=prev&oldid=1221976538 this] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Irish_people_in_Great_Britain&diff=prev&oldid=1221976707 this]. Those edit summaries don't meet the requirement to disclose the copying and link to the copied page that's outlined in my message above. [[User:Cordless Larry|Cordless Larry]] ([[User talk:Cordless Larry|talk]]) 18:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
:::Attribution was clearly given in first edit summary. For the second, it would be reasonable to assume the source was the former, especially as the contents of the former is in the latter. [[User:Uamaol|UaMaol]] ([[User talk:Uamaol#top|talk]]) 23:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
::::And the link? [[User:Cordless Larry|Cordless Larry]] ([[User talk:Cordless Larry|talk]]) 06:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::You've provided them both. [[User:Uamaol|UaMaol]] ([[User talk:Uamaol#top|talk]]) 00:55, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::What I meant was, you've not been including links to the source article in your edit summaries when copying material, which is part of the attribution requirements. [[User:Cordless Larry|Cordless Larry]] ([[User talk:Cordless Larry|talk]]) 08:48, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::::You say that like it's a prolific problem, when in reality it's three and a half edits within 8 minutes. [[User:Uamaol|UaMaol]] ([[User talk:Uamaol#top|talk]]) 17:11, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::::It wasn't a comment on the extent of the problem (I haven't checked whether you'd made this mistake before) but an explanation of what you failed to do. I suggest that rather than arguing, you just fix the attribution. [[User:Cordless Larry|Cordless Larry]] ([[User talk:Cordless Larry|talk]]) 17:28, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::I'm not arguing at all. How does one edit an edit summary? Is that even a thing? [[User:Uamaol|UaMaol]] ([[User talk:Uamaol#top|talk]]) 16:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::Unfortunately it's not possible, but you can make a dummy edit (for example, just adding a space somewhere) and accompany it with a new edit summary. How to do this is explained at [[WP:RIA]]. You could also use [[:Template:Copied]] on the talk pages of the source and destination articles. Thanks for your co-operation. [[User:Cordless Larry|Cordless Larry]] ([[User talk:Cordless Larry|talk]]) 18:25, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
==Disambiguation link notification for May 12 ==
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Aylesbury duck]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Crest]].
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 17:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision|WikiProject Eurovision]] Invitation! ==
<div id="{{{id}}}" style="border:4px solid #D4C098; padding:3px; color:#000000; margin:0 10%; background-color:#F6F6E2; width:; text-align: center">
'''WikiProject Eurovision invitation for Uamaol!'''
[[Image:Wiki Eurovision Heart (Infobox).svg|left|75px]]
Hello, I've noticed that you contributed to an article within our project's scope, and would like to formally invite you to join our team of editors at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision|WikiProject Eurovision]], a WikiProject dedicated to the [[Eurovision (network)|Eurovision family of events]]. If you would like to join, then please '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/Members|add your name to this list]]''' and add the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision|project talk page]] to your [[Help:Watching pages|watchlist]].<br><small>You may also wish to receive our Project's [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/Newsletters|newsletter]]; if so then please add your name to '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/Members/Spamlist|the mailing list]]'''.</small>
{{collapse top|title=Expand this box to view a list of contests this project covers.|bg=#F6F6E2}}
{{div col|colwidth=22em}}
* [[ABU Asia-Pacific Song Contest]]
* [[ABU International Dance Festival]]
* [[ABU Radio Song Festival]]
* [[ABU TV Song Festival]]
* Bala Turkvision Song Contest
* [[Bundesvision Song Contest]]
* [[Cân i Gymru]]
* [[Caribbean Song Festival]]
* [[Eurovision Choir of the Year]]
* [[Eurovision Dance Contest]]
* [[Eurovision Song Contest]]
* [[Eurovision Young Dancers]]
* [[Eurovision Young Musicians]]
* [[Intervision Song Contest]]
* [[Junior Eurovision Song Contest]]
* [[OGAE]]
* [[OGAE Second Chance Contest]]
* [[OGAE Video Contest]]
* [[Pan Celtic Festival]]
* [[Sopot International Song Festival]]
* [[Turkvision Song Contest]]
{{Div col end}}
{{collapse bottom}}
Thanks and have a nice day! [[User:Grk1011|Grk1011]] ([[User talk:Grk1011|talk]]) 21:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
</div><!-- Template:EurovisionInvite -->
== Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion ==
[[File:Peacedove.svg|60px|left]]
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard]] regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! {{clear}}<!--Template:DRN-notice--> [[User:PicturePerfect666|PicturePerfect666]] ([[User talk:PicturePerfect666|talk]]) 23:28, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
:The reason for inclusion is the proposal to create a new article is open states to be a vehicle to be a repository for including everything under the sun on Israel as quoted here “as well as a big chunk of the Israel in Eurovision 2024 article”
:Therefor I thought it best to include those involved o that discussion as that is also listed as a discussion to try and resolve the issue. I hope that this explanation helps. [[User:PicturePerfect666|PicturePerfect666]] ([[User talk:PicturePerfect666|talk]]) 04:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
::Where is this stated? [[User:Uamaol|UaMaol]] ([[User talk:Uamaol#top|talk]]) 04:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
:::The last line of the first comment in the discussion by the person who started the discussion. [[User:PicturePerfect666|PicturePerfect666]] ([[User talk:PicturePerfect666|talk]]) 04:19, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
::::Which discussion are you referring to exactly? [[User:Uamaol|UaMaol]] ([[User talk:Uamaol#top|talk]]) 04:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::[[Talk:Eurovision Song Contest 2024#New article]] [[User:PicturePerfect666|PicturePerfect666]] ([[User talk:PicturePerfect666|talk]]) 04:23, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
==Disambiguation link notification for July 9 ==
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Christian Aid]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[New Testament Church of God]].
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 18:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
| |||