Weight: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Block quotes don't use outer quote marks
 
(43 intermediate revisions by 33 users not shown)
Line 4:
| name = Weight
| width =
| image = WeeghaakMass versus weight in earth and mars.JPGsvg
| imagesize = x200px300px
| caption = A [[springdiagram scale]] measuresexplaining the weightmass ofand an object.weight
| unit = [[newton (unit)|newton]] (N)
| otherunits = [[pound-force]] (lbf)
Line 21:
}}
}}
In [[science]] and [[engineering]], the '''weight''' of an object is a quantity associated with the [[gravitational force]] actingexerted on the object dueby other objects in its environment, although there is some variation and debate as to [[acceleration]]the orexact [[gravity]]definition.<ref name="Morrison">{{cite journal
|title=Weight and gravity - the need for consistent definitions
|author=Richard C. Morrison
Line 36:
}}</ref><ref name="Gat">{{cite book |title=Standardization of Technical Terminology: Principles and Practice – ''second volume'' |editor=Richard Alan Strehlow |date=1988 |publisher=[[ASTM International]] |isbn=978-0-8031-1183-7 |chapter=The weight of mass and the mess of weight |last=Gat |first=Uri |pages=45–48 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CoB5w9Km0mUC&pg=PA45}}</ref>
 
Some standard textbooks<ref name='Knight'>{{Cite book|author=Knight, Randall D.|year=2004|title=Physics for Scientists and Engineers: a Strategic Approach|location=San Francisco, USAUS|publisher=Addison–Wesley|isbn=0-8053-8960-1|pages=100–101|url=https://archive.org/details/physicsforscien200knig}}</ref> define weight as a [[Euclidean vector|vector]] quantity, the [[gravitational force]] acting on the object. Others<ref name='Bauer-and-Westfall'>{{Cite book |authorfirst1=Bauer, Wolfgang and Westfall,|last1=Bauer |first2=Gary D. |last2=Westfall |year=2011 |title=University Physics with Modern Physics|location=New York|publisher=McGraw Hill|isbn=978-0-07-336794-1 |pages=103}}</ref><ref name='Serway-and-Jewett'>{{Cite book |authorfirst1=Serway, Raymond A. and Jewett,|last1=Serway |first2=John W. Jr.|last2=Jewett |year=2008 |title=Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern Physics|location=USAUS|publisher=Thompson|isbn=978-0-495-11245-7 |pages=106}}</ref> define weight as a scalar quantity, the magnitude of the gravitational force. Yet others<ref name='Hewitt'>{{Cite book|author=Hewitt, Paul G.|year=2001|title=Conceptual Physics|location=USAUS|publisher=Addison–Wesley|isbn=0-321-05202-1|pages=[https://archive.org/details/conceptualphysic00hewi_3/page/159 159]|url=https://archive.org/details/conceptualphysic00hewi_3/page/159}}</ref> define it as the magnitude of the [[reaction (physics)|reaction]] force exerted on a body by mechanisms that counteract the effects of gravity: the weight is the quantity that is measured by, for example, a spring scale. Thus, in a state of [[free fall]], the weight would be zero. In this sense of weight, terrestrial objects can be weightless: ignoringso if one ignores [[Drag (physics)|air resistance]], one could say the famouslegendary apple falling from the tree{{cn|date=March 2024}}, on its way to meet the ground near [[Isaac Newton]], would bewas weightless.
 
The [[unit of measurement]] for weight is that of [[force]], which in the [[International System of Units]] (SI) is the [[newton (unit)|newton]].<ref name="Morrison" /> For example, an object with a mass of one kilogram has a weight of about 9.8 newtons on the surface of the Earth, and about one-sixth as much on the [[Moon]]. Although weight and mass are scientifically distinct quantities, the terms are often confused with each other in everyday use (e.g. comparing and converting force weight in pounds to mass in kilograms and vice versa).<ref name="Canada">The National Standard of Canada, CAN/CSA-Z234.1-89 Canadian Metric Practice Guide, January 1989:
*'''5.7.3''' Considerable confusion exists in the use of the term "weight". In commercial and everyday use, the term "weight" nearly always means mass. In science and technology "weight" has primarily meant a force due to gravity. In scientific and technical work, the term "weight" should be replaced by the term "mass" or "force", depending on the application.
*'''5.7.4''' The use of the verb "to weigh" meaning "to determine the mass of", e.g., "I weighed this object and determined its mass to be 5{{spaces}}kg," is correct.</ref>
 
Further complications in elucidating the various concepts of weight have to do with the [[theory of relativity]] according to which gravity is modeled as a consequence of the [[curvature]] of [[spacetime]]. In the teaching community, a considerable debate has existed for over half a century on how to define weight for their students. The current situation is that a multiple set of concepts co-exist and find use in their various contexts.<ref name="Galili"/>
 
==History==
[[File:3199 - Athens - Stoà of Attalus Museum - Bronze weights - Photo by Giovanni Dall'Orto, Nov 9 2009.jpg|thumb|[[Ancient Greece|Ancient Greek]] official bronze weights dating from around the 6th century BC, exhibited in the [[Ancient Agora Museum]] in Athens, housed in the [[Stoa of Attalus]].]]
[[File:Weighing grain, from the Babur-namah.jpg|thumb|170px|Weighing grain, from the Babur-namah<ref>{{cite web|author=Sur Das |url=http://warfare.atspace.eu/Moghul/Baburnama/Weighing_Grain.htm |title=Weighing Grain |date=1590s |work=Baburnama}}</ref>]]
Discussion of the concepts of heaviness (weight) and lightness (levity) date back to the [[ancient Greek philosophy|ancient Greek philosophers]]. These were typically viewed as inherent properties of objects. [[Plato]] described weight as the natural tendency of objects to seek their kin. To [[Aristotle]], weight and levity represented the tendency to restore the natural order of the basic elements: air, earth, fire and water. He ascribed absolute weight to earth and absolute levity to fire. [[Archimedes]] saw weight as a quality opposed to [[buoyancy]], with the conflict between the two determining if an object sinks or floats. The first operational definition of weight was given by [[Euclid]], who defined weight as: "the heaviness or lightness of one thing, compared to another, as measured by a balance."<ref name="Galili"/> Operational balances (rather than definitions) had, however, been around much longer.<ref>http://www.averyweigh-tronix.com/museum {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130228235853/http://www.averyweigh-tronix.com/museum/ |date=2013-02-28 }} accessed 29 March 2013.</ref>
 
Line 64 ⟶ 62:
 
==Definitions==
{{Excessive examples|date=October 2023}}
[[File:Nitrolympics TopFuel 2005.jpg|thumb|right|300px|This [[top fuel|top-fuel dragster]] can accelerate from zero to {{convert|160|km/h|0}} in 0.86 seconds. This is a horizontal acceleration of 5.3{{spaces}}g. Combined with the vertical g-force in the stationary case the [[Pythagorean theorem]] yields a g-force of 5.4{{spaces}}g. It is this g-force that causes the driver's weight if one uses the operational definition. If one uses the gravitational definition, the driver's weight is unchanged by the motion of the car.]]
Several definitions exist for ''weight'', not all of which are equivalent.<ref name="Gat"/><ref name="King">{{cite journal
|title=Weight and weightlessness
Line 88 ⟶ 86:
|Resolution 2 of the 3rd General Conference on Weights and Measures<ref name="3rdCGPM"/><ref name="NIST330">{{Cite book |editor1=David B. Newell |editor2=Eite Tiesinga |title=The International System of Units (SI) |url=https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.330-2019.pdf |publisher=[[National Institute of Standards and Technology|NIST]] |location=Gaithersburg, MD |date=2019|edition=NIST Special publication 330, 2019 |page=46 }}</ref>}}
This resolution defines weight as a vector, since force is a vector quantity. However, some textbooks also take weight to be a scalar by defining:
{{blockquote|"The weight ''W'' of a body is equal to the magnitude ''F<sub>g</sub>'' of the gravitational force on the body."<ref name="Halliday 2007 95">{{cite book |title=Fundamentals of Physics |volume=1 |first1=David |last1=Halliday |first2=Robert |last2=Resnick |first3=Jearl |last3=Walker |publisher= Wiley |date=2007 |edition=8th |page=95 |isbn= 978-0-470-04473-5}}</ref>}}
 
The gravitational acceleration varies from place to place. Sometimes, it is simply taken to have a [[standard gravity|standard value]] of {{nowrap|9.80665 m/s<sup>2</sup>}}, which gives the [[standard weight]].<ref name="3rdCGPM">{{cite web
Line 97 ⟶ 95:
 
The force whose magnitude is equal to ''mg'' newtons is also known as the '''m kilogram weight''' (which term is abbreviated to '''kg-wt''')<ref>Chester, W. Mechanics. George Allen & Unwin. London. 1979. {{ISBN|0-04-510059-4}}. Section 3.2 at page 83.</ref>
 
{{multiple image
| align = right
| direction = horizontal
| header = Measuring weight versus mass
| image1 = Weegschaal-1.jpg
| width1 = 125
| image2 = Bascula_9.jpg
| width2 = 220
| footer = Left: A [[Weighing scale|spring scale]] measures weight, by seeing how much the object pushes on a spring (inside the device). On the Moon, an object would give a lower reading. Right: A [[weighing scale|balance scale]] indirectly measures mass,<!-- It compares weights. It has the secondary effect of comparing masses because weight is proportional to mass. --> by comparing an object to references. On the Moon, an object would give the same reading, because the object and references would ''both'' become lighter.}}
 
===Operational definition===
{{multiple image
| align = right
| direction = horizontal
| header = Measuring weight versus mass
| image1 = Weegschaal-1.jpg
| width1 = 125
| image2 = Bascula_9.jpg
| width2 = 220
| footer = Left: A [[Weighing scale|spring scale]] measures weight, by seeing how much the object pushes on a spring (inside the device). On the Moon, an object would give a lower reading. Right: A [[weighing scale|balance scale]] indirectly measures mass,<!-- It compares weights. It has the secondary effect of comparing masses because weight is proportional to mass. --> by comparing an object to references. On the Moon, an object would give the same reading, because the object and references would ''both'' become lighter.}}
}}
In the operational definition, the weight of an object is the [[force]] measured by the operation of weighing it, which is '''the force it exerts on its support'''.<ref name="King"/> Since ''W'' is the downward force on the body by the centre of earth and there is no acceleration in the body, there exists an opposite and equal force by the support on the body. Also it is equal to the force exerted by the body on its support because action and reaction have same numerical value and opposite direction. This can make a considerable difference, depending on the details; for example, an object in [[free fall]] exerts little if any force on its support, a situation that is commonly referred to as [[weightlessness]]. However, being in free fall does not affect the weight according to the gravitational definition. Therefore, the operational definition is sometimes refined by requiring that the object be at rest.{{Citation needed|date=May 2010}} However, this raises the issue of defining "at rest" (usually being at rest with respect to the Earth is implied by using [[standard gravity]]).{{Citation needed|date=May 2010}} In the operational definition, the weight of an object at rest on the surface of the Earth is lessened by the effect of the centrifugal force from the Earth's rotation.
 
Line 151 ⟶ 149:
 
==Mass==
{{Main|Mass versus weight}}[[File:WeightNormal.svg|thumb|250px|An object with mass ''m'' resting on a surface and the corresponding [[free body diagram]] of just the object showing the [[force]]s acting on it. NoticeThe that the amountmagnitude of force that the table is pushing upward on the object (the ''N'' vector) is equal to the downward force of the object's weight (shown here as ''mg'', as weight is equal to the object's mass multiplied with the acceleration due to gravity): because these forces are equal, the object is in a state of [[mechanical equilibrium|equilibrium]] (all the forces and [[Moment (physics)|moments]] acting on it sum to zero).]]
{{Main|Mass versus weight}}
In modern scientific usage, weight and [[mass]] are fundamentally different quantities: mass is an [[Intrinsic and extrinsic properties|intrinsic]] property of [[matter]], whereas weight is a ''force'' that results from the action of [[gravity]] on matter: it measures how strongly the force of gravity pulls on that matter. However, in most practical everyday situations the word "weight" is used when, strictly, "mass" is meant.<ref name="Canada"/><ref name="NIST811wt">{{cite journal |author=A. Thompson |author2=B. N. Taylor |name-list-style=amp |title=The NIST Guide for the use of the International System of Units, Section 8: Comments on Some Quantities and Their Units |journal=Special Publication 811 |url=http://physics.nist.gov/Pubs/SP811/sec08.html#8.3 |publisher=[[NIST]] |orig-year=July 2, 2009 |date=March 3, 2010 |access-date=2010-05-22}}</ref> For example, most people would say that an object "weighs one kilogram", even though the kilogram is a unit of mass.
 
Line 164 ⟶ 161:
| publisher = Chemical Rubber Publishing Co.
| date = 1961
| location = Cleveland, USAUS
| pages=3480–3485
}}</ref> at different locations on Earth (see [[Earth's gravity]]). These variations alter the relationship between weight and mass, and must be taken into account in high-precision weight measurements that are intended to indirectly measure mass. [[Spring scale]]s, which measure local weight, must be calibrated at the location at which the objects will be used to show this standard weight, to be legal for commerce.{{Citation needed|date=May 2010|reason=Doesn't this depend on the jurisdiction?}}
Line 216 ⟶ 213:
 
In commercial and everyday use, the term "weight" is usually used to mean mass, and the verb "to weigh" means "to determine the mass of" or "to have a mass of". Used in this sense, the proper SI unit is the [[kilogram]] (kg).<ref name=NIST811wt/>
 
As of 20 May 2019, the kilogram, which is essential to evaluate the weight of an object, has been redefined in terms of Planck's constant. The new definition does not affect the actual amount of the material but increases the measurement's quality and decreases the uncertainty associated with it.<ref>Yadav, S., & Aswal, D. K. (2020, February 25). Redefined SI Units and Their Implications. Mapan, pp. 1-9.</ref>
Prior to using Planck's constant, a physical object was used as a standard. The object, located in a vault in Sèvres, France, has fluctuated by approximately 50 micrograms of its mass since it was first introduced in 1889.<ref>Jeffrey-Wilensky, J. (2019, May 20). The definition of the kilogram just changed. Here's what that means. Retrieved from NBC News: https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/definition-kilogram-just-changed-here-s-what-means-ncna1007731</ref> Consequently, the following must be true. Mass, which should be the same whether on earth or the moon for example, is only valid on earth since it needs to be referenced. Also, comparing a weight measurement to a standard that changes with time cannot be used as a reference without citing the actual value of it at the time and moment it was used as such. Therefore, to redefine the kilogram all National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) involved determined the new value of Planck's constant by evaluating a mass which was calibrated against the IPK.<ref name="Ehtesham, B. 2020">Ehtesham, B., John, T., Yadav, S., Singh, H. K., Mandal, G., & Singh, N. (2020). Journey of Kilogram from Physical Constant to Universal Physical Constant (h) via Artefact: A Brief Review. MAPAN - Journal of Metrology Society of India, 1-9</ref> To this extent one kilogram is equal to h/(6.62607015×10^(-34) ) m^(-2) s which equals 1 m^(-2) s.
A kilogram has remained the same quantity it was before the redefinition.<ref name="Ehtesham, B. 2020"/> But as of May 2019, the weights measured and recorded can be traced back and used as comparison for current and future work.
 
===Pound and other non-SI units===
Line 225 ⟶ 218:
| url = https://www.nist.gov/pml/wmd/metric/common-conversion-b.cfm
| title = Common Conversion Factors, Approximate Conversions from U.S. Customary Measures to Metric
| journal = NistNIST
| date = 13 January 2010
| publisher = [[National Institute of Standards and Technology]]
Line 252 ⟶ 245:
==Relative weights on the Earth and other celestial bodies==
{{Main|Earth's gravity|Surface gravity}}
The table below shows comparative [[Surface gravity|gravitational accelerations at the surface]] of the Sun, the Earth's moon, each of the planets in the solar system. The “surface”"surface" is taken to mean the cloud tops of the [[gasgiant giantsplanet]]s (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune). For the Sun, the surface is taken to mean the [[photosphere]]. The values in the table have not been de-rated for the centrifugal effect of planet rotation (and cloud-top wind speeds for the gasgiant giantsplanets) and therefore, generally speaking, are similar to the actual gravity that would be experienced near the poles.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
Line 305 ⟶ 298:
{{Wiktionary|gross weight}}
* {{annotated link|Human body weight}}
* {{annotated link|Specific weight}}
* [[Tare weight]]
* {{annotated link|wey (unit)|weight}} the English unit
* [[Weight (object)]]
 
==Notes==