Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions

 

=== Topic ban Proposal ===

I wasn't going to go this far, but as {{u|VegaDark}} has raised the issue, {{tq|"Ban me from making good faith nominations at CfD for categories I genuinely feel are detrimental to the project?"}}, I'm beginning to feel that he really doesn't understand how far different his interpretation of "categories I genuinely feel are detrimental to the project" is from so many other Wikipedians' view in these cases. Therefore I propose:

* '''A topic ban of one month from CfD for''' {{user5|VegaDark}}

*'''Oppose''' VegaDark is acting in good faith. My chief concern is that a letter-of-policy approach comes off as heavy handed and humorless, and that policy ought to be modified to avoid a grumpy no-fun-allowed environment. I have other concerns about how CfD operates with respect to encyclopedic content that I'll take up in a more appropriate venue. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></font>''' 13:15, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

*'''Oppose''' VegaDark is acting in good faith implementing policy, and, dare I say it, whilst Drmies' defence of a category is VERY funny, none of the categories themselves seem even remotely funny, or even comprehensible in some cases. [[User:Pincrete|Pincrete]] ([[User talk:Pincrete|talk]]) 23:39, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

 

=== Long standing consensus over many years ===