Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Statement by Colin: re Loki |
→Statement by Colin: add |
||
Line 1,233:
Loki, as with so much of this AE, people are putting words into my mouth. "but he still said that calling children who ''were seeking puberty blockers for gender dysphoria'' ..." is not what I said. I clearly literally said "the treatment of children referred to CAMHS or GIDS-equivalent centres" and the complaint by Cass referred to "all the young people on the waiting list for services". And "referred", at the time, included self-referral, whereas now it is restricted to a referral by a clinician. Understanding this patient cohort is an significant aspect of the Cass Review, something they commissioned a systematic review to investigate. It is vital that editors on that page, and similar ones, restrain themselves to the careful terminology used in our MEDRS sources (WPATH, Cass, BMJ). -- [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 07:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
[[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde93]] I'm concerned that Loki's post, which conveniently misquotes my words in the worst possible light, was made '''after''' you guys had discussed the issue of people misquoting and mischaracterising my words in the worst possible light. You can't just write this off as Colin's writing style because it extends to people treating MEDRS sources in the worst possible light, based on prejudice, disinformation and conspiracy theories they have read about in the lowest quality sources. I don't think we can say that the writing style in the Cass Review or the BMJ is to blame for editors making outrageous claims about them. At some point this is going to need examined and dealt with. -- [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 07:49, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
====Statement by berchanhimez====
| |||