Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antiquities (Magic: The Gathering): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''keep''' [[User:Shii|Shii]] [[user_talk:Shii|(tock)]] 04:11, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
===[[Antiquities (Magic: The Gathering)]]===
:{{la|Antiquities (Magic: The Gathering)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antiquities (Magic: The Gathering)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 October 3#{{anchorencode:Antiquities (Magic: The Gathering)}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Antiquities_(Magic:_The_Gathering) Stats]</span>)
Line 14 ⟶ 20:
*'''Keep All''' SqueamishOrange's comments in the omnibus nominations above apply here - ''[[InQuest Gamer]]'' and ''[[Scrye]]'' extensively covered each and every set of Magic, including retrospectives for early releases such as these, and they were the two premier publications in the card-gaming industry in the 1990s; coverage has only increased since then as the game has become even more popular. Plenty of secondary source material here, even if that is not evident in the current revisions for some of these articles. [[User:Chubbles|Chubbles]] ([[User talk:Chubbles|talk]]) 16:14, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
*'''Merge to [[Magic: The Gathering early expansions]]:''' Yes, the article needs more sourcing. Yes, there's content that can be salvaged. No, it doesn't deserve its own article anymore than the recent expansions do (see the RfC at [[Talk:Ice Age (Magic: The Gathering)]] for why they don't anymore). <small>Yes, I've been toying with proposing that merge for a month now, and this seems as good a time as any</small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#800080">[[User:Purplebackpack89|<span style="color:#FFCC00">p</span>]][[User talk:Purplebackpack89|<span style="color:#FFCC00;">b</span>]][[User:Purplebackpack89/C|<span style="color:#FFCC00;">p</span>]]</span> 17:02, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Games|list of Games-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:48, 4 October 2013 (UTC)</small>
*'''Keep''' I read [[Scrye]] starting with the first issue, and the early issues definitely provided significant coverage even of the Magic sets that came out before the magazine started being published. I believe [[InQuest Gamer]] also covered the earliest sets. [[User:Calathan|Calathan]] ([[User talk:Calathan|talk]]) 23:15, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per comments in the related AfDs. [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit|talk]]) 23:05, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' (Cross-posted to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invasion (Magic: The Gathering)]]) Though it pains my little fanboy heart, these standalone articles are not appropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia. The articles are almost exclusively sourced from the [[Wizards of the Coast]] homepage and the blogs/Tumblrs/etcetera of the designers and staff that worked on the product, which means they are not third-party sources and therefore cannot be used as [[WP:SOURCE|reliable sources]]. To respond to the comments saying we should keep these because Wikipedia is a good source of this information, I'd like to point you to the [http://wiki.mtgsalvation.com/ MTG Salvation Wiki] as well as [[WP:PPOV|this list of arguments to avoid in deletion discussions]] and rationales why they are not useful. Also, [[WP:OTHERSTUFF]].
:A portion of the content could be merged into the [[Magic:The Gathering|main article]]. --[[User:jonny-mt|<span style="color:#297AA3">'''jonny'''</span>]]-[[Special:Contributions/jonny-mt|<span style="color:#A3293D">'''m'''</span>]][[User talk:jonny-mt|<span style="color:#3DA329">'''t'''</span>]] 01:44, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
::You may want to review your vote. Since nomination, all the articles now have on average 2 "third-party sources" as references, some as many as 5. Plenty more can be added. [[User:Leitmotiv|Leitmotiv]] ([[User talk:Leitmotiv|talk]]) 02:36, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per comments in the related AfDs. --[[User:Phyrexian|Phyrexian]] [[User talk:Phyrexian|ɸ]] 20:20, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||