Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shooting of Alton Sterling: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
m typo
Line 35:
*'''Keep''' per [[WP:EVENTCRIT]]: In-depth coverage from [http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/06/us/alton-sterling-baton-rouge-shooting.html?_r=0 NYT], [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/07/06/video-captures-white-baton-rouge-police-officer-fatally-shooting-black-man-sparking-outrage/ Washington Post], [http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/06/us/baton-rouge-shooting-alton-sterling/index.html CNN], [http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/alton-sterling-shooting-baton-rouge-protest-1.3666471 CBC] [http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-36721584 BBC], [https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/06/protests-in-baton-rouge-after-louisiana-police-shoot-alton-sterling-dead Guardian], and [http://time.com/4395459/alton-sterling-baton-rouge-police-shooting/ TIME], [http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-louisiana-police-officer-fatally-shoots-suspect-20160705-story.html AP] constitutes {{tq|widespread (national or international) impact and...very widely covered in diverse sources}}, and far exceeds {{tq|routine news reporting on things like announcements, sports, or celebrities}} (from [[WP:NOTNEWS]]). Justice Dept. probe and ongoing protests ensure this will last more than a news cycle. [[User:FourViolas|FourViolas]] ([[User talk:FourViolas|talk]]) 21:46, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
*'''Strong keep''' This is receiving plenty of media coverage. [[User:Blaylockjam10|Blaylockjam10]] ([[User talk:Blaylockjam10|talk]]) 21:51, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' because of the huge volume of coverage in high-provideprofile, reliable sources. I'm a user who tends to have a fairly strong bias against wanting one-time news to be included, but the coverage here is great. In particular, there's enough material from reliable sources to write a full article. [[User:Cazort|Cazort]] ([[User talk:Cazort|talk]]) 21:54, 6 July 2016 (UTC)