Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ratel: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Comments by other users: BLP/N settles the issue - he is engaging in behaviour which nearly got him banned just a few months ago |
Jabbsworth (talk | contribs) →Comments by other users: tiring nonsense |
||
Line 73:
And now Ratel has posted the [[WP:BLP]] violation at length and with a BIG heading to make sure that everyone see that Drudge has these allegations. And carps that I posted at BLP/N when he asked me to. Occam's Razor tells us precisely what to do with this sock. Cheers. [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 11:44, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
* The consensus, until you commented on BLPN, was that much of the data was usable. So it's is not a BLP vio (BTW it was on the matt Drudge page for a long time until YOU deleted it and then campaigned to have it removed at BLPN. Those other editors WERE NOT my socks, ok! I'm not sure where you are getting all those quotes, and what they are about, but it's not material for this page, as far as I can tell. You seem to be confusing me with other people. I notice that you keep trying to influence admin decisions here with big hints and nudges. Please stop. This is a content dispute and the arguments are weak. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Jabbsworth|<font style="color:lightgrey;background:black;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Jabbsworth '''</font>]]</span></small> 13:27, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======
| |||