Wikipedia:Teahouse: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Davecorbray (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 721:
:{{u|Davecorbray}}, I see that {{u|Southdevonian}} asked you on your talk page whether you had used AI to create Wikipedia content, and you admitted that you had. He then explained why you should not do that. I see no "sabotage" or threats. [[User:Maproom|Maproom]] ([[User talk:Maproom|talk]]) 20:09, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
::I know @[[User:Maproom|Maproom]] that he had asked me that whether I used AI or not, and yes I admitted. I admitted it. Yet, he didn’t say anything about the fact that I used it only recently, about a week ago editing the article [[Spencer Perceval]], even then I only used ChatGPT only for paraphrasing long sentences and simplifying texts that are unclear or sources like books or online websites. I have apologised for the irrefutable errors and the damage caused by it. But he used this as a justifiable excuse to revert the rest of edits. Also, what I mean by “threatened” (not threats btw) is that he accuses me of being a sock puppet or whatever it is, that is what I called sabotage. So even this does not give any credibility whatsoever for my point. [[User:Davecorbray|Davecorbray]] ([[User talk:Davecorbray|talk]]) 20:20, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
:::I had a look at [[John Russell, 1st Earl Russell#Economic policy]], a section which you created. I read there "In addition to the Bank Charter Act of 1844, Russell's government pursued monetary policies aimed at maintaining price stability and supporting economic growth. The adoption of the gold standard, as enshrined in the Bank Charter Act, provided a framework for the regulation of the money supply and the stabilisation of the currency." But Russell was in opposition throughout 1844. I think {{u|Southdevonian}} is right to be sceptical about the value of your contributions. [[User:Maproom|Maproom]] ([[User talk:Maproom|talk]]) 20:40, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
| |||