Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
TimothyRias (talk | contribs) →Quark dispute: lol |
|||
Line 348:
::The first paragraph of [[Quark]] already mentions QGP; we don't need to pile more unfamiliar terminology like [[Hagedorn temperature]] on top of that. [[User:XOR'easter|XOR'easter]] ([[User talk:XOR'easter|talk]]) 06:40, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
:::Unfamiliar to whom? Anyone who is familiar with quarks would also be familiar with Hadedorn temperature. Making an absolute claim in science like '''never''' without clarification is not okay. In fact, it becomes a scientific incorrect statement. Just because QGP is mentioned, that doesn't negate the fact that the statement is false without clarification. [[Special:Contributions/14.169.100.161|14.169.100.161]] ([[User talk:14.169.100.161|talk]]) 08:35, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
::::In the voice of our favorite bunny [[Sam and Max|Max]], "that is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard". People generally learn about quarks in high school (possibly elementary school). Hagedorn temperature on the other hand will likely only appear in advanced undergraduate or graduate courses in particle physics. So the group of people familiar with the term quark is probably at least three to four orders of magnitude bigger than the those how have heard of the Hagedorn temperature. Needless to say to former is our target audience, not the latter.[[User:TimothyRias|T]][[User talk:TimothyRias|R]] 11:24, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
| |||