User contributions for Saturn comes back around
Results for Saturn comes back around talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 133 edits. Account created on 12 June 2015.
18 May 2024
- 01:4101:41, 18 May 2024 diff hist +335 Talk:Men Going Their Own Way →Misogynistic?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:4001:40, 18 May 2024 diff hist +154 Talk:Men Going Their Own Way →Misogynistic?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:3701:37, 18 May 2024 diff hist +244 Talk:Men Going Their Own Way →16 May 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:3601:36, 18 May 2024 diff hist +531 Talk:Men Going Their Own Way →16 May 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:3301:33, 18 May 2024 diff hist +1,083 Talk:Men Going Their Own Way →16 May 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:2001:20, 18 May 2024 diff hist +2,074 Talk:Men Going Their Own Way →Misogynistic?: Reply Tag: Reply
2 May 2024
- 15:5115:51, 2 May 2024 diff hist −11 m Enharmonic equivalence →Meantone: Much as with 'PIN number', 'ATM machine', and a slew of other similarities, 'MIDI interface' is unnecessarily prolix. no grievous sin by any stretch... but when repeated often enough, promotes mass misuse. Regardless of all that, however, it is in any case probably ill-advised usage for a dictionary.
13 October 2022
- 23:2823:28, 13 October 2022 diff hist +18 User:Saturn comes back around No edit summary current Tag: Visual edit: Switched
10 October 2022
- 20:2320:23, 10 October 2022 diff hist +5 m User:Saturn comes back around No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
22 June 2018
- 07:5107:51, 22 June 2018 diff hist +23 m Late antiquity added reigning dates for clarity/insight. Tag: Visual edit
22 May 2018
- 15:1115:11, 22 May 2018 diff hist +162 History of the Jews in Poland added a small, but vital fact which is (sadly) often overlooked
21 March 2018
- 20:5220:52, 21 March 2018 diff hist +380 Talk:2018 Russian presidential election No edit summary
- 20:4120:41, 21 March 2018 diff hist +63 Culture of Poland Undid revision 831556037 by Special:Contributions/2001:8003:2568:A200:7408:235F:BE1F:F2D1 Tag: Undo
- 20:1920:19, 21 March 2018 diff hist +23 Talk:Pangaea Proxima →PROPOSAL: article name change to Pangaea Proxima
- 20:1320:13, 21 March 2018 diff hist +93 Talk:Pangaea Proxima →PROPOSAL: article name change to Pangaea Proxima
- 20:0920:09, 21 March 2018 diff hist +51 Talk:Pangaea Proxima →PROPOSAL: article name change to Pangaea Proxima
- 20:0520:05, 21 March 2018 diff hist +2,189 Talk:Pangaea Proxima No edit summary
- 19:3119:31, 21 March 2018 diff hist +28 m Zealandia adding an obvious one, since that was the page that referred me here ;o) Tag: Visual edit
- 19:1519:15, 21 March 2018 diff hist +2 m Supercontinent →Supercontinents throughout geologic history: - Omitting the lefthandmost digit(s) when providing the second member of a range should *only* be done when the range *increases* from left to right. Otherwise, ambiguity arises as to what is being omitted. All well and good, but when *every* other entry in the table *decreases*, rearranging some entries to increase just to omit a single digit is confusing, and therefore, improper. Tag: Visual edit
17 March 2018
- 11:5111:51, 17 March 2018 diff hist +185 Phanerozoic →Proterozoic-Phanerozoic boundary Tag: Visual edit
16 March 2018
- 19:1519:15, 16 March 2018 diff hist +40 m Phanerozoic minor recasting to help prevent confusion Tag: Visual edit
- 19:0919:09, 16 March 2018 diff hist +19 m Phanerozoic insertion of a (likely temporary) sole qualifier while the ongoing scientific debate currently rages over whether modern phyla emerged with the Cambrian or just prior. once reasonable consensus emerges, this can be recast one way or the other. for now, qualifying as such seems the most appropriate thing to do. Tag: Visual edit
- 15:3715:37, 16 March 2018 diff hist +3,029 Talk:Moons of Pluto →Pre-Algebraic Conflicts
15 March 2018
- 20:3120:31, 15 March 2018 diff hist +44 Talk:Moons of Pluto →Pre-Algebraic Conflicts
- 20:3020:30, 15 March 2018 diff hist +395 Talk:Moons of Pluto →Pre-Algebraic Conflicts
- 20:2120:21, 15 March 2018 diff hist +3,257 Talk:Moons of Pluto →Pre-Algebraic Conflicts
- 19:1719:17, 15 March 2018 diff hist +811 User talk:Ravensfire No edit summary
- 18:4818:48, 15 March 2018 diff hist +600 User talk:Binksternet →Sorry for asking here
- 18:3818:38, 15 March 2018 diff hist +1,928 User talk:Binksternet →Sorry for asking here
14 March 2018
- 16:4416:44, 14 March 2018 diff hist +1,173 User talk:Binksternet →Sorry for asking here
- 16:2016:20, 14 March 2018 diff hist +173 User talk:Saturn comes back around →March 2018
- 16:1816:18, 14 March 2018 diff hist +174 User talk:Saturn comes back around →March 2018
- 16:1216:12, 14 March 2018 diff hist +305 User talk:Saturn comes back around →March 2018
- 16:1016:10, 14 March 2018 diff hist +427 User talk:Saturn comes back around →March 2018
- 16:0716:07, 14 March 2018 diff hist +527 User talk:Binksternet No edit summary
- 16:0316:03, 14 March 2018 diff hist +283 User talk:Saturn comes back around →March 2018
- 15:0515:05, 14 March 2018 diff hist +1,582 Talk:Moons of Pluto No edit summary
- 14:4814:48, 14 March 2018 diff hist −2 m Moons of Pluto →Resonances: gosh, never been in an actual edit war before! but hey, so long as NOBODY justifies the absurdity of stating one ratio in one sentence, then stating a DIFFERENT ratio in the other four sentences (and nice picture of actual orbits visually), i'm happy to go at it. either leave this edit, or add an explanation how the utterly incompatible 18:22:33 results in 6:9:11 orbits. i believe doing otherwise is called vandalism, unless i'm much mistaken. and if you must use paywall sources, have the courtesy to at least quote something relevant. even a single sentence of explanation will do. reverting is otherwise vandalism. Tag: Visual edit
13 March 2018
- 14:5514:55, 13 March 2018 diff hist −2 m Moons of Pluto No good telling people to check inaccessible source, esp. if it is clearly at odds with everything else written down, including our own full scale picture model of the entire cycle, where it adds up to 6:9:11, exactly as stated EVERYWHERE ELSE BUT this one ridiculous tidbit of conflicting info. So before reverting, perhaps you can also add a sentence explaining the discrepancy. Tag: Visual edit
- 04:5104:51, 13 March 2018 diff hist −2 m Moons of Pluto →Resonances: derp requires even MOAR herp, as 18:27:33 is not in smallest possible form. Tag: Visual edit
- 04:4804:48, 13 March 2018 diff hist 0 m Moons of Pluto →Resonances: So, apparently needed more herp in the derp, cos 3*9 ain't 22. :o) Tag: Visual edit
7 March 2018
- 16:2416:24, 7 March 2018 diff hist +73 m XMM-Newton clarification request Tag: Visual edit
- 16:0416:04, 7 March 2018 diff hist +9 m RZ Piscium wording fix, based on cited reference, to remove a Tag: Visual edit
3 March 2018
- 20:2220:22, 3 March 2018 diff hist +4 m Virophage Grammar & flow corrections and reduction/removal of additional, misleading interpretations in some of the phrases. Tag: Visual edit
28 February 2018
- 19:5319:53, 28 February 2018 diff hist +30 m Giant virus Helped this here resident move from downtown Run-On City, out into the 'burbs. ;o) (i.e., minor grammar schtuff) Tag: Visual edit
6 February 2018
- 23:2323:23, 6 February 2018 diff hist +6,248 Paleoproterozoic OK, so, after re-reading the article, a number of things sent up red flags. I've done my best to address them. Chiefly, they are of two kinds: grammar & flow, and outdated/unsupported statements. So I rewrote/replaced a bit and threw in "a few" refs. ;o) Tag: Visual edit
- 20:5720:57, 6 February 2018 diff hist +68 m Paleoproterozoic Dangling Participles Must Die!!! ;o) no, seriously -- the original was at best unclear, suggesting it was the Proterozoic Eon (and not the PaleoP.E. of this article) that was defined by the timespan provided. Also, some very minor grammar/flow tweaks.
20 June 2017
- 18:5418:54, 20 June 2017 diff hist −6 m Anatomy →Definition: the image shows what is clearly a drawing (and following its link brings one to a description confirming this). the remaining changes here follow from that fact. Tag: Visual edit
15 June 2017
- 18:3618:36, 15 June 2017 diff hist +12 m Zoroaster →Date: Spelling/grammar correction. The "apostrophe after s" applies ONLY for plurals, good people. NEVER for any other possessive markers. :o) Tag: Visual edit
9 March 2017
- 19:1319:13, 9 March 2017 diff hist +100 m Indus Valley Civilisation Recasting for clarity by moving a term which was used prior to its definition.