Content deleted Content added
→Comments: ok, then let's end this now |
close Indian Railways good article nomination as unsuccessful (GANReviewTool) |
||
Line 1:
==GA Review==
{{atopr
| status =
| result = Unsuccessful. [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]) 09:36, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
}}
{{Good article tools}}
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Indian Railways/GA2|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Indian Railways/GA2]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>
Line 23 ⟶ 27:
:Thanks! [[User:Magentic Manifestations|Magentic Manifestations]] ([[User talk:Magentic Manifestations|talk]]) 06:24, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
:: On (a), the question is then should we hold this GAN open for a substantial time or close it now and let you work on it at leisure; on (b), you seem to be justifying a much larger degree of overlap than I envisage (everyone will accept that there must be some, but this article's focus cannot be largely on R matters as it is now). I think, given that we agree there is a large amount to be done and that it will take an indeterminable amount of time to do, and that we seem to disagree on the desired end point for the article under (b), we should end this GAN now. I look forward to seeing the rewritten article when it is ready. [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]) 09:36, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
{{abot}}
| |||