Content deleted Content added
←Created page with '==GA Review== {{Good article tools}} {{subst:GAN/subst|{{subst:PAGENAME}}}} '''Reviewer:''' [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]] ([[User talk:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|contribs]]) ~~~~~ <!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) be...' |
close States and union territories of India good article nomination as unsuccessful (GANReviewTool) |
||
Line 1:
==GA Review==
{{atopr
| status =
| result = Unsuccessful. <small> [[User:Generalissima|Generalissima]] ([[User talk:Generalissima|talk]]) (it/she) </small> 16:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
}}
{{Good article tools}}
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:States and union territories of India/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:States and union territories of India/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>
Line 9 ⟶ 13:
However, if you want a GA in this field, I think splitting "State (India)" and/or "Union territory (India)" off into their own seperate articles which talks about their administrative functions and roles would be very possible GAs, and possibly allow for a [[WP:Good Topic|Good Topic]] alongside this. <small> [[User:Generalissima|Generalissima]] ([[User talk:Generalissima|talk]]) (it/she) </small> 16:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
{{abot}}
| |||