Content deleted Content added
Unfortunately, I'm going to close this as a fail |
close Lalita Tademy good article nomination as unsuccessful (GANReviewTool) |
||
Line 1:
==GA Review==
{{atopr
| status =
| result = Unsuccessful. [[User:Pbritti|Pbritti]] ([[User talk:Pbritti|talk]]) 15:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
}}
{{Good article tools}}
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Lalita Tademy/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Lalita Tademy/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>
Line 58 ⟶ 62:
::If it's still not up to standard, though I know it needs more attribution. Let me know or leave the review to Monday. This is an appeal. Thanks and can be verified by my edits so far. Thanks.<span id="SafariScribe:1713655734252:TalkFTTCLNLalita_Tademy/GA1" class="FTTCmt"> — <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:SafariScribe|Safari Scribe]]</span><sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/SafariScribe|'''''Edits!''''']] [[User talk:SafariScribe|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 23:28, 20 April 2024 (UTC)</span>
:::This article has come a long way over the last week. Unfortunately, though, it retains a great number of minor factual issues, major MOS issues, and a deficiency in sourcing corresponding with content. I encourage you to resubmit this article to GAN after some more cleaning has been done. Do not be discouraged, as you have clearly demonstrated an exceptional ability to embrace criticism and improve Wikipedia. If you resubmit this for review, I'd love to look at it again. Best, ~ [[User:Pbritti|Pbritti]] ([[User talk:Pbritti|talk]]) 15:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
{{abot}}
| |||