Content deleted Content added
Pass |
promote Midland Main Line upgrade to good article (GANReviewTool) |
||
Line 1:
==GA Review==
{{atopg
| status =
| result = Passed. [[User:DimensionalFusion|<span style="color:#EF7627">Dimensional</span><span style="color:#D162A4">Fusion</span>]] [[User:DimensionalFusion/Talk|<span style="color:#A30262">(talk)</span>]] 23:44, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
}}
{{Good article tools}}
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Midland Main Line upgrade/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Midland Main Line upgrade/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>
Line 102 ⟶ 106:
*:{{tq|The necessity for citations in a lead should be determined on a case-by-case basis by editorial consensus.}} [[User:DimensionalFusion|<span style="color:#EF7627">Dimensional</span><span style="color:#D162A4">Fusion</span>]] [[User:DimensionalFusion/Talk|<span style="color:#A30262">(talk)</span>]] 21:45, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
{{od|::::::::::}}Since that is an MOS, only a few are applicable to the [[WP:GACR|GA criteria]]. MOS:LEADCITE is not one of them. If this was an FAC, then that would apply (since FAs have to comply with almost all the MOS). See also: [[WP:GANOT]][[User:JuniperChill|JuniperChill]] ([[User talk:JuniperChill|talk]]) 19:27, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
{{abot}}
| |||