Content deleted Content added
→GA Review: Reply |
Reconrabbit (talk | contribs) promote Tiger quoll to good article (GANReviewTool) |
||
Line 1:
==GA Review==
{{atopg
| status =
| result = Passed. [[User:Reconrabbit|<span style="color:#6BAD2D">Recon</span>]][[User talk:Reconrabbit|<span style="color:#2F3833">rabbit</span>]] 21:45, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
}}
{{Good article tools}}
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Tiger quoll/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Tiger quoll/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>
Line 95 ⟶ 99:
:Cited the wrong study (my bad), and fixed the other issue. [[User:Wolverine XI|<span style="color:#000080;">'''''Wolverine'''''</span> <span style="color:#8A307F;">'''''XI'''''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Wolverine XI|<span style="color:#2C5F2D;">talk to me</span>]])</sup> 19:06, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
{{abot}}
| |||