Content deleted Content added
DrFleischman (talk | contribs) →April 2018: new section |
|||
Line 198:
==I have no Idea what you are talking about ==
Please inform me what article is considered "an attack Page" and is thus verboten. I have no Idea what you are talking about.[[User:Arglebargle79|Arglebargle79]] ([[User talk:Arglebargle79|talk]]) 12:31, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
== April 2018 ==
{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''
'''Please carefully read this information:'''
The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2|here]].
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->
Regarding [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Charlie_Kirk_(activist)&diff=837667938&oldid=837634454 this revert], you're editing against the consensus at [[Talk:Turning Point USA#Merge proposal]]. Sure, consensus can change, but it doesn't change by edit warring. You have to go to the talk page and convince folks. What you did was disruptive. --[[User:DrFleischman|Dr. Fleischman]] ([[User talk:DrFleischman|talk]]) 09:28, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
|