Content deleted Content added
Tassedethe (talk | contribs) →Rome Douglas: new section |
|||
Line 233:
Hi Smartse. You deleted and salted [[Rome Douglas]] as "G5: Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban". A new page has since been created at [[Rome Douglas (American football)]] by a user who appears in good standing. If you're OK it should be moved to the basename. Thanks. [[User:Tassedethe|Tassedethe]] ([[User talk:Tassedethe|talk]]) 00:31, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
:{{re|Tassedethe}} Thanks for letting me know. I've taken a look at {{noping|ChrisGriswold}} but I don't come to the same conclusion as you in regards to them being in good standing, despite them being a former admin. As you can see [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/ec/en.wikipedia.org/ChrisGriswold here], they had barely edited in 10 years before recreating this article and [[Arjun_Malhotra_(entrepreneur)]]. Both of those articles were salted at their original titles - see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arjun Malhotra]] and [[Arjun Malhotra]] and the last creator {{noping|Shreyoshi_ghosh}} did disclose that they were paid. The chances of ChrisGriswold recreating these articles in good faith is essentially zero in my opinion, especially when much of the content has been reused. The most likely explanation is that the account is compromised and I will block it accordingly. We'll need to consider what to do with the articles, along with {{la|ThreatModeler}} and {{noping|CalebEdwardAllistair}} (added photo to the Malhotra article). [[User:Smartse|SmartSE]] ([[User talk:Smartse|talk]]) 09:47, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
| |||