Talk:DejaVu fonts

Typography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Computing High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Encylopedic??

Latest comment: 17 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

I don't think detailed information on Unicode coverage is really encyclopedic. 2.7 is about to be released anyway, so information about 2.3 is already out of date. —Keenan Pepper 23:36, 8 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

When new version comes out, and we have chance to check out the characters in each block, then one of us can update that. ~ Tarikash 02:07, 9 June 2006 (UTC).

(In my opinion,) this page is the right most place to include detail info, like this. If only the latest version info is updated/covered, then it will not turn into a version log. This info gives the chance to have a real sense of what is actually included inside a font, how much it covers. It answers, Why this is a Unicode font. ~ Tarikash 02:17, 9 June 2006 (UTC).

I think unicode coverage is useful; but details can be fetched from the project page, as it is linked in the external link section. I have translated this page (and then extended it a bit) to Italian. I think it would be useful to list the fonts included in the package. I can translate that section from Italian, but someone should check my translation afterwards. — Mikelima 08:20, 9 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

I have a question: what's the newest release: 2.17 or 2.8? There is an inconsistency on the Wikipedia. On this page, 2.17 is written, but on Unicode_fonts it's 2.8. This is weird.

2.17 http://dejavu.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page Med 18:02, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! 83.76.178.32 17:14, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

OpenType ?

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Looking this one with the font viewer in Windows, it says that the font is OpenType. Should not this be in the article ? --Jerome Potts (talk) 20:19, 4 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Metric compatibility with Verdana...?

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The box at the head of the article states that DejaVu Sans is metrically compatible with Verdana. A quick test in a word processor - pasting two identical batches of the lorem ipsum text and setting them in the two fonts - shows that they are not identical: a line of Verdana takes up slightly more horizontal space than DejaVu Sans.--79.69.67.23 (talk) 22:44, 4 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic