Alex mond
Welcome!
edit
|
Do not remove citation requests and other tags without good reason. If you have a credible reference, just cite it. If you don't, you should ask yourself why you are so convinced your claim is true. You should then go to a library and do some actual research. Writing an encyclopedia is not about edit-warring over your preferred version of "truth", it is about doing painstaking research on what we know from which source. If you feel that the Akkadian Empire or Naram-Sin articles lack citation, feel free to add {{fact}} requests there, but do not use it as an excuse for sloppy referencing on other articles. dab (𒁳) 07:25, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
3RR on Armenian language
edit
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. — Gareth Hughes 21:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Heimstern Läufer (talk) 22:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
{{unblock|I need to cite source in language hypothesis page, and about the Armenian language page, the 3RR was not correct, cause the other previous edits that totalled that amount where about slightly different edits Alex mond 06:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)}
Please stop making changes to the Great Pyramid of Giza which are WP:FRINGE. Please discuss your changes and please the WP:FRINGE guidance. Thanks Markh 19:51, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Alex mond, you are again edit warring, and risk further blocks under 3RR. If you are just here for this sort of disruption, I really suggest you edit http://www.armenianhighland.com but not Wikipedia, which has a policy. dab (𒁳) 16:29, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
No, thats 2RR if you look carefully, one of those is not a revert of someone else, and please respond to my discussion in Talk page. Otherwise you are all BS here. Dont waste my time, we tried to fix this BS site, but it seems to remain in Jewish lies. And yes, the Jewish were involved in a hidden way of the Armenian Genocide. Alex mond 16:31, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- I ask you to please stay away from my talkpage. If you have an on-topic comment on a specific article, use the article's talkpage. thanks. dab (𒁳) 17:08, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Dbachmann, I did discuess with you in Talk:Armenia, but you didnt respond to me, why??? Cause thats nationalism?? Haha, is everything nationalism to you?
I asked you is Ancient Records, 3rd millenium BC Indo-European presence, and Most Western sources of Armenians in the land over 4000 years, Nationalism to you???? Alex mond 17:11, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
With regards to your comments on User_talk:Dbachmann: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you., specifically this comment, which was completely uncalled for - Alison ☺ 17:14, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Blocked again
edit- You have been blocked for 24 hours for engaging in personal attacks after Alison's warning. [1]. ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 02:50, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- This block has been extended because you evaded the block by editing as User:216.175.84.39. While you are blocked you should not edit Wikipedia under any username or IP address. --Akhilleus (talk) 18:23, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- You're back and already engaging in edit warring and POV pushing [2]. I'm banning you for a week. Adam Cuerden talk 02:28, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
POV pushing? It is actually those words their in the end that is POV pushing. I already had discussions with Dbachmann about these issues. This isnt nationalism or Armenian patriotism, since V.V. Ivanov and Tamaz Gamkrelidze are the ones that embraced the Armenian hypothesis with the Glottic theory. We also discussed together about the ancient records in the Bronze Age here -> Talk:Armens. Also there are Indo-European (Aryan) presence from ancient burial mounds, swastika symbols, and culture of the 3rd millenium BC Kuro-Araxes culture, which continued to another culture in 2nd millenium BC with Indo-European presence. In 2nd millenium BC Hayasa, etc etc tribes and states continue with Indo-European, with those records of the name clearly identify Armenians and Armenia. The name Armen or Arman which both Persians and Germans (other Indo-European Aryans) put also Alex mond 06:32, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Your block has been extended to a period of two weeks because you edited as User:65.148.132.167, as seen in this diff. While you are blocked you should not edit Wikipedia under any username, from any IP address. --Akhilleus (talk) 16:10, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Dbachmann
editDiaknoff doesnt know about the other records, like the Thotmose III record in 1500 BC of Ermenen (another recognizable IE form of the name Armen). Dbachmann, I read about Diaknoff and the issue with Ebla , where he doesnt seem to understand the obvious Indo-European etymology of Armani or Armanum, and that Armenians and other IE people put Arman (from Armani) also besides Armen. If Diaknoff looked further he would realize that Kuro-Araxes culture that spread to the same place in Northern Syria, indeed had Indo-European present. Also continued in the 2nd millenium BC. Diaknoff is not complete, and he is missing a lot of info Alex mond 15:12, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- says Wikipedia editor "Alex mond", whose word thus stands against that of Igor Diakonov, recognized as one of the greatest experts on the Ancient Near East of the 20th century. dab (𒁳) 10:33, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
That's really sad if the greatest Near East scholar doesnt realize what I mentioned above. Its cause he didnt say those things, you have distorted his words. I doubt he said those exact things you put as his source. Show me (give me his book's page # etc) the exact parts he says the Thotmose III record of Ermenen is not referring to Armenians, or Armenia, and that its not an Indo-European etymology, huh? *grin*. Mr Dbachmann, you will not find Diaknoff mention about this Thutmose III Ermenen record. You know why? Because he has not even seen that in his life. He has seen the Armani record, Im sure of that one, that one is well known. By the way, Armenian authors have not seen the Ermenen record either, that you mentioned in our discussions earlier that its Armenian historians saying that. Hah, this is all coming from you man, its not coming from Armenian historians, neither is coming from Diaknoff. You are distorted all of this yourself. One last thing, I never said Armin (you trying to say 512 BC record to this day), is what to this day they call Armenia, (from Talk:Armens), I said the 2400 BC Armani to this day Persians, Arabs, and Assyrians refer to Armenians by Armani. I see your tactics here man, I see them. Dont think you can get away with those man. Be very careful man. Alex mond 11:24, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Also, read here from Igor Diakonov --> http://dienekes.angeltowns.net/articles/ieorigins/ to get the comparison also with Colin Renfrew's view of the Anatolian homeland, of "Pre"-Proto-Indo-Europeans. Which would corrispond to the Kuro-Araxes culture spreading to Northern Syria. Which reveals again more evidence of Armani (Armenians). Alex mond 16:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Block extended for block evasion
editYour block has been extended to a period of one month because you edited as User:User:Aramazd7, as seen in this diff. While you are blocked you should not edit Wikipedia under any username, from any IP address. If you evade the block one more time this account will be blocked indefinitely. --Akhilleus (talk) 03:47, 26 June 2007 (UTC)